Diffusion of contingency management and attitudes regarding its effectiveness and acceptability

Substance Abuse

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 127-135

  Bride, Brian E ^a   Abraham, Amanda J ^a   Roman, Paul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingency management; counselor attitudes; diffusion; evidence based practice; motivational incentives

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COUNSELING; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 77955338951     PISSN: 08897077     EISSN: 15470164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2010.495310     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. Bridging the gap: a hybrid model to link efficacy and effectiveness research in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54: 333-339.
2. Compton WM, Stein JB, Robertson EB, Pintello D, PringleB, VolkowND. Charting a course for health services research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;29:167-172.
3. Institute of Medicine. Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research: Forging Partnerships With Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
4. Marinelli-Casey P, Domier CP, Rawson RA. The gap between research and practice in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53:984-987.
5. Ducharme LJ, Knudsen HK, Roman PM, Johnson JA. Innovation adoption in substance abuse treatment: exposure, trialability, and the Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;32:321-329.
6. Roman PM, Johnson JA. Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:211-218.
7. Saxon AJ, McCarty D. Challenges in the adoption of new pharmacotherapies for addiction to alcohol and other drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;108:119-128.
8. Simpson DD. A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:171-182.
9. Knudsen HK, Ducharme LJ, Roman PM, Link T. Buprenorphine diffusion: the attitudes of substance abuse treatment counselors. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;29: 95-106.
10. Rieckman T, Daley M, Fuller BE, Thomas CP, McCarty, D. Client and counselor attitudes toward the use of medications for treatment of opioid dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;32:207-215.
11. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006;101:192-203.
12. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2006;101:1546-1560. (Pubitemid 44527186)
13. Petry NM, Simcic F. Recent advances in the dissemination of contingency management techniques: clinical and research perspectives. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23:81-86.
14. Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, Kranzler HR. Give them prizes and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psy- chol. 2000;68:250-257.
15. Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Hughes J, Foerg FE, Badger GJ. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:568-576.
16. Shoptaw S, Reback CJ, Peck JA, et al. Behavioral treatment approaches for methamphetamine dependence and HIV-related sexual risk behaviors among gay and bisexual men. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;78:125-134.
17. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, et al. Targeting behavioral therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: efficacy of contingency management and significant other involvement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:755-761.
18. Petry NM, Pierce JM, Stitzer ML, et al. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1148-1156.
19. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
20. Condon TP, Miner LL, Balmer CW, Pintello D. Blending addiction research and practice: strategies for technology transfer. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008;35:156-160.
21. McGovern MP, Fox TS, Xie H, Drake RE. A survey of clinical practices and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: dissemination research in the addiction treatment system. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;26:305-312.
22. Stitzer M. Contingency management and the addictions. Addiction. 2006;101:1536-1537.
23. Kirby KC, Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kerwin ME. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;85:19-27.
24. Herbeck DM, Hser Y, Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: a survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addict Be- hav. 2008;33:699-712.
25. Mee-Lee DL, Gartner L, Miller MM, Shulman GD, Wilford B. Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Chevy Chase, MD: ASAM; 1996
26. Forman RF, Bovasso G, Woody G. Staff beliefs about addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;21:1-9.
27. Ball S, Bachrach K, DeCarlo J, et al. Characteristics, beliefs and practices of community clinicians trained to provide manual-guided therapy for substance abusers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23:309-318.
28. Kasarabada ND, Hser YI, Parker L, Hall E, Anglin MD, Chang E. A self-administered instrument for assessing therapeutic approaches of drug-treatment counselors. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:273-299.
29. Knudsen HK, Roman PM. Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment organizations: the role of absorptive capacity. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;26:353-361.
30. Nelson TD, Steele RG. Predictors of practitioner self-reported use of evidence-based practices: practitioner training, clinical setting, and attitudes toward research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007;34:319-330.
31. Menard S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
32. Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2006.