The phylogenetic interpretation of biological surveys

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1380-1392

  Bell, Graham ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIOLOGICAL SURVEY; COMMON ANCESTRY; DICOTYLEDON; MAP; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

DICOTYLEDONEAE;

EID: 84882626069     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bell G. 1989. A comparative method. Am. Nat. 133: 553-571.
2. Bell G. 2000. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat. 155: 606-617.
3. Bell G. 2003. The interpretation of biological surveys. Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 2531-2542.
4. Bell G. 2005. The co-distribution of species in relation to the neutral theory of community ecology. Ecology 86: 1757-1770.
5. Blomberg S. P. and Garland T. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaption and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 899-910.
6. Bradshaw A. D. 1989. The Croonian lecture: genostasis and the limits to evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 333: 289-305.
7. Brakefield P. M. 1987. Industrial melanism: do we have the answers? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 117-122.
8. Cadbury D. A. et al. 1971. A computer-mapped flora: a study of the county of Warwickshire. - Academic Press.
9. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12: 693-715.
10. Darwin C. R. 1859. On the origin of species. - John Murray, London.
11. Derrickson E. M. and Ricklefs R. E. 1988. Taxon-dependent diversification of life-history traits and the perception of phylogenetic constraints. Funct. Ecol. 2: 417-423.
12. Dornels M. et al. 2006. Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 440: 80-82.
13. Ellenberg H. 1979. Zeigerwerte der Gefäszplanten Mitteleuropas. - Scripta Geobot. 9, Göttingen, Germany.
14. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
15. Gravel D. et al. 2011. Experimental niche evolution alters the strength of the diversity-productivity relationship. Nature 469: 89-92.
16. Harpole W. S. and Tilman D. 2006. Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. Ecol. Lett. 9: 15-23.
17. Harvey P. H. and Pagel M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
18. Haston E. et al. 2007. A linear sequence of angiosperm phylogeny group II families. Taxon 56: 7-12.
19. Housworth E. A. et al. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. Am. Nat. 163: 84-96.
20. Hubbell S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
21. Losos J. B. 1992. The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anolis communities. Syst. Biol. 41: 403-420.
22. Losos J. B. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett. 11: 995-1007.
23. Losos J. B. 2011. Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am. Nat. 177: 709-727.
24. McGill B. J. et al. 2006. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87: 1411-1423.
25. Mouquet N. et al. 2012. Ecophylogenetics: advances and per s pectives. Biol. Rev. 87: 769-785.
26. Primavesi A. L. and Evans P. A. (eds) 1988. Flora of Leicestershire. Leicestershire Mus. Publ. no. 89, Leicester, UK.
27. Prinzing A. et al. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. - Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 2383-2389.
28. Prinzing A. et al. 2008. Less lineages - more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. Ecol. Lett. 11: 809-819.
29. Rundle H. D. et al. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287: 306-308.
30. Silvertown J. et al. 2001. Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. J. Ecol. 89: 428-435.
31. Silvertown J. et al. 2006. Phylogeny and the hierarchical organi zation of plant diversity. Ecology 87: 839-849.
32. Ter Braak C. J. F. and Gremmen N. J. M. 1987. Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenberg's indicator values for moisture. Vegetatio 69: 79-87.
33. Tutin T. G. et al. 1964-1980. Flora Europaea. Vol. 1-5. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
34. Vamosi S. M. et al. 2009. Emerging patterns in the phylogenetic analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 18: 572-592.
35. Wiens J. J. and Graham C. H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519-539.