First application of FISK, the freshwater fish invasiveness screening kit, in Northern Europe: Example of southern Finland

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1397-1403

  Puntila, Riikka ^a   Vilizzi, Lorenzo ^b   Lehtiniemi, Maiju ^c   Copp, Gordon H ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b MURRAY DARLING FRESHWATER RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^c FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^e BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea Region; Decision support tools; Non native species; Non native species management; Risk identification; Species introductions

Indexed keywords

BALTIC SEA; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; NON-NATIVE SPECIES; RISK IDENTIFICATION; SPECIES INTRODUCTIONS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOOLS;

FISH;

FISH; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; INVASIVENESS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; FINLAND; JAPAN; UNITED KINGDOM;

PISCES;

FRESH WATER;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BALTIC SEA REGION; CALIBRATION; CLIMATE; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS; ECOLOGY; FINLAND; FISH; INTRODUCED SPECIES; METHODOLOGY; NON-NATIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK IDENTIFICATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES INTRODUCTIONS; TEMPERATURE;

BALTIC SEA REGION; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS; NON-NATIVE SPECIES; NON-NATIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT; RISK IDENTIFICATION; SPECIES INTRODUCTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CALIBRATION; CLIMATE; ECOLOGY; FINLAND; FISHES; FRESH WATER; INTRODUCED SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84882584791     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12069     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cohen AN, Carlton JT. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science, 1998; 279:555-558.
2. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science, 1999; 286:1577-1579.
3. Leppäkoski E, Collasch S, Gruszka P, Ojaveer H, Olenin S, Panov V. The Baltic-A sea of invaders. Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 2002; 59:1175-1188.
4. Hesthagen T, Sandlund OT. Non-native freshwater fishes in Norway: History, consequences and perspectives. Journal of Fish Biology, 2007; 71(Suppl D):173-183.
5. Carlton JT, Geller JD. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science, 1993; 261:78-82.
6. Ricciardi, A, Rasmussen JB. Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: A priority for aquatic resource management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 1998; 55:1759-1765.
7. Urho L, Lehtonen H. Kalalajit Suomessa. Riista- ja kalatalous-Selvityksiä 1/2008.
8. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science, 2002; 298:1233-1236.
9. Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Finland's National Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Helsinki, Finland, 2012.
10. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management, 1999; 57:239-251.
11. Copp GH, Garthwaite R, Gozlan RE. Risk Identification and Assessment of Non-Native Freshwater Fishes: Concepts and Perspectives on Protocols for the UK. Cefas Science Technical Report. Lowestoft, UK, 2005. Available at: http://www.cefas.co.uk///.pdf, Accessed on January 30, 2012.
12. Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29:457-467.
13. Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Gherardi F, Copp GH. Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater invertebrates. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30:285-292.
14. Mastitsky SE, Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Adamovich BV. Non-native fishes of Belarus: Diversity, distribution, and risk classification using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Aquatic Invasions, 2010; 5:103-114.
15. Troca DFA, Vieira JP. Potential invasive non-native fish farmed in the coastal region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 2012; 38(2):109-120 [in Portuguese].
16. Onikura N, Nakajima J, Inui R, Mizutani H, Kobayakawa M, Fukuda S, Mukai T. Evaluating the potential of invasion by non-native freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu Island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyological Research, 2012; 58:382-387.
17. Lawson LL Jr, Hill JE, Vilizzi L, Hardin S, Copp GH. Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1414-1431.
18. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, Mcmahon TA. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2007; 11:1633-1644.
19. HELCOM. Maritime activities in the Baltic Sea-An integrated thematic assessment on maritime activities and response to pollution at sea in the Baltic Sea Region. In Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 2010.
20. Welcomme, RL. International Introductions of Inland Aquatic Species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 1988.
21. HELCOM. Assessment of coastal fish in the Baltic Sea. In Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 2006; No. 103 A Balt. Sea.
22. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Critical Care, 2004; 8:508-512.
23. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 1950; 3:32-35.
24. DeLong, ER, DeLong, DM, Clarke-Pearson, DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988; 44:837-845.
25. R Development Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
26. Anderson AJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. PERMANOVA +for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E Ltd, 2008.
27. Ljungberg R, Pikkarainen, A, Lehtiniemi M, Urho L. Vieraslajien havaitseminen Suomen merialueen seurannoissa. Suomen ympäristö 10, 2011.
28. Kolar CS, Chapman DC, Courtenay WRJ, Housel CM, Williams JD, Jennings DP. Asian Carps of the Genus Hypophthalmichthys (Pisces, Cyprinidae)-A Biological Synopsis and Environmental Risk Assessment. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service per Interagency Agreement 94400-3-0128, 2005.
29. Gozlan RE, Andreou D, Asaeda T, Beyer K, Bouhadad R, Burnard D, Caiola N, Cakic P, Djikanovic V, Esmaeili HR, Falka I, Golicher D, Harka A, Jeney G, Kováč V, Musil J, Nocita A, Povž M, Poulet N, Virbickas T, Wolter C, Tarkan AS, Tricarico E, Trichkova T, Verreycken H, Witkowski A, Zhang C-g, Zweimueller I, Britton JR. Pan-continental invasion of Pseudorasbora parva: Towards a better understanding of freshwater fish invasions. Fish and Fisheries, 2010; 11:315-340.
30. Vetemaa M, Eschbaum R, Albert A, Saat T. Distribution, sex ratio and growth of Carassius gibelio (Bloch) in coastal and inland waters of Estonia (north-eastern Baltic Sea). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2005; 21:287-291.
31. ICES. Report of the ICES Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO), 14-16 March 2012, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES CM 2012/ACOM:31.
32. Reshetnikov, AN. The current range of Amur sleeper Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Odontobutidae, Pisces) in Eurasia. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2010; 1:119-126.
33. Reshetnikov, AN, Ficetola, GF. Potential range of the invasive fish rotan (Perccottus glenii) in the Holarctic. Biological Invasions, 2011; 13:2967-2980.
34. Reshetnikov, AN. The introduced fish, rotan (Perccottus glenii), depresses populations of aquatic animals (macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and a fish). Hydrobiologia, 2003; 510:83-90.
35. Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Davies GD, Godard M, Copp GH. Non-native fishes and climate change: Predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshwater Biology, 2010; 55:1130-1141.
36. Dubs DOL, Corkum LD. Behavioral interactions between round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and mottled sculpins (Cottus bairdi). Journal of Great Lakes Research 1996; 22:838-844.
37. Lauer TE, Allen PJ, Mccomish TS. Changes in mottled sculpin and johnny darter trawl catches after the appearance of round gobies in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2004; 133:185-189.
38. Balshine S, Verma A, Chant V, Theysmeyer T. Competitive interactions between round gobies and logperch. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2005; 31:68-77.
39. Lederer A, Massart J, Janssen J. Impact of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) on dreissenids (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis) and the associated macroinvertebrate community across an invasion front. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2006; 32:1-10.
40. Almqvist G, Strandmark AK, Appelberg M. Has the invasive round goby caused new links in Baltic food webs? Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2010; 89:79-93.
41. Almeida D, Ribeiro F, Leunda PA, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, to perform risk identification assessments in the Iberian peninsula. Risk Analysis, 2013: 33(8):1404-1413.