Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, to perform risk identification assessments in the Iberian Peninsula

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1404-1413

  Almeida, David ^a,b   Ribeiro, Filipe ^c,d   Leunda, Pedro M ^e,f   Vilizzi, Lorenzo ^g   Copp, Gordon H ^a,b,f,h  

^a CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^d Museu Nacional de Historia Natural Universidade de Lisboa   (Portugal)

^e Gestión Ambiental de Navarra S A   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^g MURRAY DARLING FRESHWATER RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^h TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alien species prescreening; Aquatic conservation; Biological invasions; Hazard identification

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; GAMBUSIA HOLBROOKI; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATES; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PRESCREENING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS; RISK IDENTIFICATION;

CONSERVATION; FISH; TOOLS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENDEMISM; FISH; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HAZARD; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIVENESS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

IBERIAN PENINSULA;

BARBODES SCHWANEFELDI; BARBONYMUS SCHWANENFELDII; CARASSIUS AURATUS; GAMBUSIA HOLBROOKI; PISCES;

FRESH WATER;

ALGORITHM; ALIEN SPECIES PRESCREENING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; AQUATIC CONSERVATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; ECOLOGY; FISH; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; METHODOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPAIN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALIEN SPECIES PRESCREENING; AQUATIC CONSERVATION; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; FISHES; FRESH WATER; INTRODUCED SPECIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPAIN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84882709042     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12050     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Almaça C. Freshwater fish and their conservation in Portugal. Biological Conservation, 1995; 72:125-127.
2. Elvira B. Conservation status of endemic freshwater fish in Spain. Biological Conservation, 1995; 72:129-136.
3. Smith KG, Darwall WRT (eds). The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Fish Endemic to the Mediterranean Basin. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, 2006.
4. Reyjol Y, Hugueny B, Pont D, Bianco PG, Beier U, Caiola N, Casals F, Cowx I, Economou A, Ferreira T, Haidvogl G, Noble R, de Sostoa A, Vigneron T, Virbickas T. Patterns in species richness and endemism of European freshwater fish. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007; 16:65-75.
5. Hermoso V, Clavero M. Threatening processes and conservation management of endemic freshwater fish in the Mediterranean Basin: A review. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2011; 62:244-254.
6. Economidis PS, Dimitriou E, Pagoni R, Michaloudi E, Natsis L. Introduced and translocated fish species in the inland waters of Greece. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2000; 7:239-250.
7. Copp GH, Stakėnas S, Davison PI. The incidence of non-native fishes in water courses: Example of the United Kingdom. Aquatic Invasions, 2006; 1:72-75.
8. Lusk S, Lusková V, Hanel L. Alien fish species in the Czech Republic and their impact on the native fish fauna. Folia Zoologica, 2010; 59:57-72.
9. Leunda PM. Impacts of non-native fishes on Iberian freshwater ichthyofauna: Current knowledge and gaps. Aquatic Invasions, 2010; 5:239-262.
10. Ribeiro F, Leunda PM. Non-native fish impacts on Mediterranean freshwater ecosystems: Current knowledge and research needs. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2012; 19:142-156.
11. Ribeiro F, Collares-Pereira MJ, Moyle PB. Non-native fish in the fresh waters of Portugal, Azores and Madeira Islands: A growing threat to aquatic biodiversity. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2009; 16:255-264.
12. Clavero M. Assessing the risk of freshwater fish introductions into the Iberian Peninsula. Freshwater Biology, 2011; 56:2145-2155.
13. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science, 2002; 298:1233-1236.
14. Vila-Gispert A, Alcaraz C, García-Berthou E. Life-history traits of invasive fish in small Mediterranean streams. Biological Invasions, 2005; 7:107-116.
15. Ribeiro F, Elvira B, Collares-Pereira MJ, Moyle P. Life-history traits of non-native fishes in Iberian watersheds across several invasion stages: A first approach. Biological Invasions, 2008;10:89-102.
16. Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29:457-467.
17. Mastitsky SE, Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Adamovich BV. Non-native fishes of Belarus: Diversity, distribution, and risk classification using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Aquatic Invasions, 2010; 5:103-114.
18. Onikura N, Nakajima J, Inui R, Mizutani H, Kobayakawa M, Fukuda S, Mukai T. Evaluating the potential of invasion by non-native freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu Island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyological Research, 2012; 58:382-387.
19. Troca DFA, Vieira JP. 2012. Potential invasive non-native fish farmed in the coastal region of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca do Estado de Sao Paulo, 2012; 38:109-120.
20. Verbrugge LNH, Van der Velde G, Hendriks AJ, Verreycken H, Leuven RSEW. Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: Application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings. Aquatic Invasions, 2012; 7:49-58.
21. Lawson LL Jr, Hill JE, Hardin S, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1414-1431.
22. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management, 1999; 57:239-251.
23. Copp GH, Garthwaite R, Gozlan RE. Risk Identification and Assessment of Non-Native Freshwater Fishes: Concepts and Perspectives on Protocols for the UK. Cefas Science Technical Report. Lowestoft, UK, 2005. Available at: http://www.cefas.co.uk///.pdf, Accessed on January 30, 2012.
24. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2001; 32:305-332.
25. Vilizzi L, Lawson LL Jr, Hill JF, Hardin S, Copp GH. Evaluation of the FISK (Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit) scoring system: A scenario-based comparison. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Clavero M, García-Berthou E. Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecological Applications, 2006; 16:2313-2324.
27. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Critical Care, 2004; 8:508-512.
28. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 1950; 3:32-35.
29. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988; 44:837-845.
30. Vergara IA, Norambuena T, Ferrada E, Slater AW, Melo F. StAR: A simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008; 9:265.
31. Venables WN, Smith DM, the R Development Core Team. An Introduction to R: Notes on R, a Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. R Core Team, 2008.
32. Renken H, Mumby PJ. 2009. Modelling the dynamics of coral reef macroalgae using a Bayesian belief network approach. Ecological Modelling, 2009; 220:1305-1314.
33. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. PERMANOVA for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E Ltd., 2008.
34. Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Davies GD, Godard M, Copp GH. Non-native fishes and climate change: Predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshwater Biology, 2010; 55:1130-1141.
35. Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Application of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, in the Murray-Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia). Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(8):1432-1440.
36. Simonović P, Tošić A, Vassilev M, Apostolou A, Mrdak D, Ristovska M, Kostov V, Nikolić V, Škraba D, Vilizzi L, Copp GH. Risk identification of non-native freshwater fishes in four countries of the Balkans Region using FISK (unpublished manuscript).
37. Welcomme RL. International Introductions of Inland Aquatic Species. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, 1988.
38. Savini D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Marchini A, Tricarico E, Gherardi F, Olenin S, Gollasch S. The top 27 animal alien species introduced into Europe for aquaculture and related activities. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2010; 26:1-7.
39. García-Berthou E. Size- and depth-dependent variation in habitat and diet of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquatic Sciences, 2001; 63:466-476.
40. Caiola N, de Sostoa A. Possible reasons for the decline of two native toothcarps in the Iberian Peninsula: Evidence of competition with the introduced eastern mosquitofish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2005; 21:358-363.
41. Alcaraz C, García-Berthou E. Life history variation of invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) along a salinity gradient. Biological Conservation, 2007; 139:83-92.
42. Alcaraz C, Bisazza A, García-Berthou E. Salinity mediates the competitive interactions between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered fish. Oecologia, 2008; 155:205-213.
43. Leunda PM, Elvira B, Ribeiro F, Miranda R, Oscoz J, Alves MJ, Collares-Pereira MJ. International standardization of common names for Iberian endemic freshwater fishes. Limnetica, 2009; 28:189-202.