Lessons learned from the conduct of a multisite cluster randomized practical trial of decision aids in rural and suburban primary care practices

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Ruud, Kari L ^a   LeBlanc, Annie ^a   Mullan, Rebecca J ^a,b   Pencille, Laurie J ^a   Tiedje, Kristina ^a,c   Branda, Megan E ^a   Van Houten, Holly K ^a   Heim, Sara R ^a   Kurland, Margary ^d   Shah, Nilay D ^a   Yawn, Barbara P ^d,e   Montori, Victor M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^d OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Practical trials; Recruitment and enrollment; Trial methodology

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION AID; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISEASE REGISTRY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PANEL STUDY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RURAL AREA; SAMPLE SIZE; SUBURBAN AREA; TELEPHONE; TRAVEL;

CORONARY DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MINNESOTA; PATIENT SELECTION; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RURAL HEALTH SERVICES; SAMPLE SIZE; SUBURBAN HEALTH SERVICES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84882373606     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-267     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 10. CD001431.
2. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. HR 3590 111th Congress of the United States of America, at the Second Session 2012, Section 936; 2010, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf.
3. O'Donnell S, Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, Graham ID, O'Connor AM, Tugwell P. Understanding and overcoming the barriers of implementing patient decision aids in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2006, 12(2):174-181. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00613.x, 16579826.
4. King VJ, Davis MM, Gorman PN, Rugge JB, Fagnan LJ. Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians. Med Decis Making 2012, 32(4):636-644. 10.1177/0272989X11431961, 3665512, 22247423.
5. Treweek S, Mitchell E, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Kjeldstrom M, Taskila T, Johansen M, Sullivan F, Wilson S, Jackson C, Jones R. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 1. MR000013.
6. Chang BH, Hendricks AM, Slawsky MT, Locastro JS. Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4(1):8. 10.1186/1471-2288-4-8, 404462, 15090073.
7. Blanton S, Morris DM, Prettyman MG, McCulloch K, Redmond S, Light KE, Wolf SL. Lessons learned in participant recruitment and retention: the EXCITE trial. Phys Ther 2006, 86(11):1520-1533. 10.2522/ptj.20060091, 17079752.
8. Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs 2010, 19(1-2):227-233.
9. Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 2. MR000013.
10. van der Wouden JC, Blankenstein AH, Huibers M, Van der Windt D, Stalman W, Verhagen AP. Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60(8):819-824. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.010, 17606178.
11. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lewin-van den Broek N, Lassen A, Vickers L, Myres P. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract 2003, 20(1):83-92. 10.1093/fampra/20.1.83, 12509377.
12. LeBlanc A, Ruud KL, Branda ME, Tiedje K, Boehmer KR, Pencille LJ, Van Houten H, Matthews M, Shah ND, May CR, Yawn BP, Montori VM. The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12(1):130. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130, 3468357, 22640439.
13. Branda ME, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Tiedje K, Ruud K, VanHouten H, Pencille L, Kurland M, Yawn B, Montori VM. Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:301. 10.1186/1472-6963-13-301, 3751736, 23927490.
14. Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, Gafni A, Guyatt GH, Bryant SC, Christianson TJ, Mullan RJ, Smith SA. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167(10):1076-1082. 10.1001/archinte.167.10.1076, 17533211.
15. Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Shah ND, Christianson TJ, Bryant SC, Guyatt GH, Perestelo-Perez LI, Stroebel RJ, Yawn BP, Yapuncich V, Breslin MA, Pencille L, Smith SA. The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169(17):1560-1568.
16. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995, 15(1):25-30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105, 7898294.
17. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, Grol R. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005, 8(1):34-42. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x, 15713169.
18. Caldwell PH, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med 2010, 7(11):e1000368. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368, 2976724, 21085696.
19. Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care 2012, 20(2):115-123.
20. Cooley ME, Sarna L, Brown JK, Williams RD, Chernecky C, Padilla G, Danao LL. Challenges of recruitment and retention in multisite clinical research. Cancer Nurs 2003, 26(5):376-386. 10.1097/00002820-200310000-00006, 14710799.
21. Felsen CB, Shaw EK, Ferrante JM, Lacroix LJ, Crabtree BF. Strategies for in-person recruitment: lessons learned from a New Jersey primary care research network (NJPCRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010, 23(4):523-533. 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090096, 2940109, 20616295.
22. Claassen C, Kurian B, Trivedi MH, Grannemann BD, Tuli E, Pipes R, Preston AM, Flood A. Telephone-based assessments to minimize missing data in longitudinal depression trials: a project IMPACTS study report. Contemp Clin Trials 2009, 30(1):13-19. 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.001, 3268227, 18761427.
23. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci 2009, 4(29):29. 2693517, 19460163.
24. Karanicolas PJ, Montori VM, Devereaux P, Schünemann H, Guyatt GH. A new 'mechanistic-practical' framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62(5):479-484. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009, 18468856.