The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): Protocol of a cluster randomized trial

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  LeBlanc, Annie ^a   Ruud, Kari L ^a   Branda, Megan E ^a   Tiedje, Kristina ^a,b   Boehmer, Kasey R ^a   Pencille, Laurie J ^a   Van Houten, Holly ^a   Matthews, Marc ^a   Shah, Nilay D ^a   May, Carl R ^e   Yawn, Barbara P ^c,d   Montori, Victor M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^c OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular prevention; Diabetes; Implementation; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MANPOWER; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; RURAL HEALTH CARE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ASPIRIN; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HUMANS; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS; MALE; MINNESOTA; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK FACTORS; RURAL HEALTH SERVICES; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 84861440717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007, In Book National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2007. 2008.
2. Huang ES, Brown SE, Ewigman BG, Foley EC, Meltzer DO: Patient perceptions of quality of life with diabetes-related complications and treatments. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:2478-2483. (Pubitemid 47547775)
3. Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, Wilson L, Yeh HC, Marinopoulos S, Wiley C, Selvin E, Wilson R, Bass EB, Brancati FL: Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2007, 147:386-399. (Pubitemid 351664540)
4. Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP: When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:893-902. (Pubitemid 37510617)
5. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, (10):CD001431. Art. No.
6. Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, Gafni A, Guyatt GH, Bryant SC, Christianson TJ, Mullan RJ, Smith SA: Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:1076-1082. (Pubitemid 46835796)
7. Breslin M, Mullan RJ, Montori VM: The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73(3):465-472.
8. Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Shah ND, Christianson TJ, Bryant SC, Guyatt GH, Perestelo-Perez LI, Stroebel RJ, Yawn BP, Yapuncich V, et al. The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:1560-1568.
9. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham I: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006, 1:16.
10. Michie S: Talking to primary care patients about weight: a study of GPs and practice nurses in the UK. Psychol Health Med 2007, 12:521-525. (Pubitemid 47396437)
11. Montori VM, Breslin M, Maleska M, Weymiller AJ: Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid. PLoS Med 2007, 4:e233.
12. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD: The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 2001, 44:119-127. (Pubitemid 32677955)
13. Glasgow RE: RE-AIMing research for application: ways to improve evidence for family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2006, 19:11-19. (Pubitemid 44046988)
14. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 2009, 4:29.
15. O'Connor AM: Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995, 15:25-30.
16. O'Connor AM: User Manual - Decisional Conflict Scale [document on the Internet].: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2010. Available from http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User-Manuals/UM-Decisional-Conflict.pdf.
17. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, Grol R: The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005, 8:34-42. (Pubitemid 40343316)
18. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R: Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003, 12:93-99. (Pubitemid 36458145)
19. Abadie R, Weymiller AJ, Tilburt J, Shah N, Charles C, Gafni A, Montori V: Clinician's use of the Statin Choice decision aid in patients with diabetes: a videographic study nested in a randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2009, 15(3):492-497.
20. Montori VM, Shah ND, Pencille LJ, Branda ME, Van Houten HK, Swiglo BA, Kesman RL, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Jaeger TM, Johnson RE, et al. Use of a decision aid to improve treatment decisions in osteoporosis: the osteoporosis choice randomized trial. Am J Med 2011, 124:549-556.
21. Ross DA, Ware JE: Measuring Health Perceptions in the Health Insurance Experiment, Measuring Health Perceptions in the Health Insurance Experiment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1981. http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R271.
22. Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, Williams A: Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual Life Res 1996, 5:521-531. (Pubitemid 27006964)
23. Sapin C, Fantino B, Nowicki ML, Kind P: Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004, 2:20.
24. Hayes AJ, Clarke PM, Glasziou PG, Simes RJ, Drury PL, Keech AC: Can selfrated health scores be used for risk prediction in patients with type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Care 2008, 31:795-797.
25. Sullivan MD, Anderson RT, Aron D, Atkinson HH, Bastien A, Chen GJ, Feeney P, Gafni A, Hwang W, Katz LA, et al. Health-related quality of life and costeffectiveness components of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial: rationale and design. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:90i-102i.
26. Eddy DM, Pawlson LG, Schaaf D, Peskin B, Shcheprov A, Dziuba J, Bowman J, Eng B: The potential effects of HEDIS performance measures on the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008, 27:1429-1441.
27. Sawin CT, Walder DJ, Bross DS, Pogach LM: Diabetes process and outcome measures in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Diabetes Care 2004, 27: (Suppl 2)B90-B94. (Pubitemid 38569271)
28. Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A: What do we mean by adherence to treatment and advice for living with diabetes? A review of the literature on definitions and measurements. Diabet Med 2006, 23:720-728. (Pubitemid 44366069)
29. Vermeire E, Wens J, Van Royen P, Biot Y, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A: Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 2005, (2): CD003638. Art. No.
30. Glick H, Doshi J, Sonnad S, Polsky D: Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. New Yok: Oxford United Press; 2007.
31. Donner A, LKlar N: Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomisation Trials in Health Research. London: Arnold; 2000.
32. Yudkin PL, Moher M: Putting theory into practice: a cluster randomized trial with a small number of clusters. Stat Med 2001, 20:341-349. (Pubitemid 32125125)
33. Denzin N: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.
34. Miles M, Huberman A: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
35. Strauss A: Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987.