International coordination and cooperation: The next agenda in nanomaterials regulation

International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 508-524

  Falkner, Robert ^a   Breggin, Linda K ^b   Jaspers, Nico ^a   Pendergrass, John ^b   Porter, Read ^c  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881956843     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Abbott, K.W., D.J. Sylvester and G.E. Marchant (2010), 'Transnational regulation: reality or romanticism?', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 525-44.
2. Breggin, L., R. Falkner, N. Jaspers, J. Pendergrass and R. Porter (2009), Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies: Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. Report, London: Chatham House, accessed at www.chathamhouse.org.uk/nanotechnology
3. Chaudhry, Q., H. Bouwmeester and Rolf F. Hertel (2010), 'The current risk assessment paradigm in relation to the regulation of nanotechnologies', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 124-43.
4. Chen, H., M.C. Roco, X. Li and Y. Lin (2008), 'Trends in nanotechnology patents', Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 123-5.
5. Choi, J., G. Ramachandran and M. Kandlikar (2009), 'The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation', Environmental Science and Technology, 43(9), 3030-34.
6. Davies, J.C. (2009), Oversight of Next Generation Nanotechnology, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
7. Davies, J.C. (2010), 'From novel materials to next generation nanotechnology: a new approach to regulating the products of nanotechnology', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 545-70.
8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2007), Nanotechnology White Paper, Washington, DC: EPA.
9. European Commission (2008), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials, Brussels: EC.
10. Falkner, R. (ed.) (2007), The International Politics of Genetically Modified Food: Diplomacy, Trade and Law, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Falkner, R., L. Breggin, N. Jaspers, J. Pendergrass and R. Porter (2009), Consumer Labelling of Nanomaterials in the EU and US: Convergence or Divergence?, EERG briefing paper 2009/03, London: Chatham House.
12. Food and Drug Administration (FOA) (2007), Nanotechnology: A Report of the US Food and Drug Administration Nanotechnology Task Force, Washington, DC: FDA.
13. Gaspar, R. (2010), 'Therapeutic products: regulating drugs and medical devices', Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 291-320.
14. Hodge, G.A., D.M. Bowman and A.D. Maynard (2010), 'Introduction: the regulatory challenges for nanotechnologies', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 3-24.
15. International Council on Nanotechnology (2008), Towards Predicting Nano-Biointeractions: An International Assessment of Nanotechnology Environment, Health and Safety Research Needs, Geneva: IRGC.
16. Lux Research (2008), Overhyped Technology Starts to Reach Potential, New York: Lux Research, accessed 15 September 2009 at http://www.luxresearchinc.com/press/RELEASE_Nano-SMR_7_22_08.pdf.
17. Mandel, G.N. (2010), 'Regulating nanotechnology through intellectual property rights', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 388-405.
18. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2008), The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Second Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel, Washington, DC: PCAST.
19. Rodemeyer, M. (2009), New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic Biology, Washington, DC: Synthetic Biology Project.
20. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008), Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology, London: RCEP.
21. Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering (RS-RAE) (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, London: RS-RAE.
22. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (2007), Opinion on Safety of Nanomaterials in Cosmetic Products, Brussels: EC.
23. van Calster, G. and D.M. Bowman (2010), 'A good foundation? Regulatory oversight of nanotechnologies using cosmetics as a case-study', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 268-90.
24. Widmer, M. and C. Meili (2010), 'Approaching the nanoregulation problem in chemicals legislation in the EU and US', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Andrew D. Maynard (eds), International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 238-67.