From novel materials to next generation nanotechnology: A new approach to regulating the products of nanotechnology

International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 545-570

  Clarence Davies, J ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881859306     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Apple (2008), MacBook Air: Environmental Report, Cupertino, CA: Apple, accessed 13 May 2009 at http://images.apple.com/environment/resources/pdf/MacBook-Air-Environmental-Report.pdf.
2. Breggin, L., R. Falkner, N. Jaspers, J. Pendergrass and R. Porter (2009), Securing the Promise of Nanotechnologies - Towards Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
3. Chen, H. and M.C. Roco (2009), Mapping Nanotechnology Innovations and Knowledge, New York: Springer.
4. Davies, J.C. (2001), Reforming Permitting, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5. Davies, J.C. (2006), Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
6. Davies, J.C. (2008), Nanotechnology Oversight, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
7. Davies, J.C. (2009), Oversight of Next Generation Nanotechnology, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
8. Environmental Defense and DuPont (2007), NanoRisk Framework, New York: Environmental Defense.
9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2008), An In-Depth Look at the United Kingdom Integrated Permitting System: Exploring Global Environmental Protection Perspectives, Washington, DC: National Centre for Environmental Innovation and EPA.
10. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2007), Nanotechnology - A Report of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Nanotechnology Task Force, Washington, DC: FDA.
11. Greenwood, M. (2009), personal communication with J. Clarence Davies, Washington, DC, 17 March.
12. International Council on Nanotechnology (2009), nanoEHS Virtual Journal, accessed 14 July 2009 at www.Icon.rice.edu/virtualjournal.cfm.
13. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2007), Nanotechnology Risk Governance, Geneva: IRGC.
14. Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Jones, R. (2008), 'When it pays to ask the public,' Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 578-9.
16. Lazarus, R.J. (2004), The Making of Environmental Law, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Maynard, A.D. and E. Kuempel (2005), 'Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health,' Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 587-614.
18. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (2008), Review of the Federal Strategy For Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health and Safety Research, Washington, DC: NAS.
19. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2001), Nanotech Facts: What is Nanotechnology?, accessed 4 May 2009 at www.nano.gov/html/fats/whatIsNano.html.
20. Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster (2005), 'Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles,' Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(7), 823-39.
21. Oberdörster, G., V. Stone and K. Donaldson (2007), 'Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective,' Nanotoxicology, 1(1), 2-5.
22. Ratner, M. and D. Ratner (2002), Nanotechnology, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Rejeski, D. (2004), 'The next small thing,' The Environmental Forum, March/April, 42-9.
24. Rizzuto, P. (2008), 'Insurance group excludes nanotubes, nanotechnology from coverage,' Daily Environment Report, 24 September.
25. Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge (2001), Societal Implications of Nanoscience And Nanotechnology, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Rodemeyer, M. (2009), New Life in Old Bottles: Regulating First Generation Products of Synthetic Biology, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
27. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008), Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology, London: UK Parliament.
28. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (RS-RAE) (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, London: RS-RAE.
29. Schaefer, M., D.J. Baker, J.H. Gibbons et al. (2008), 'An Earth Systems Science Agency,' Science, 321(4 July), 44-5.
30. Schierow, L.J. (2007), The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): Implementation and New Challenges, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
31. Service, R.F. (2008), 'Can high-speed tests sort out which nanomaterials are safe?', Science, 321(22 August), 1036-7.
32. Swiss Re (2004), Nanotechnology: Small Matter, Many Unknowns, Geneva: Swiss Re.