-
1
-
-
0000280110
-
Do The Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions
-
Alexander, Janet Cooper(1991), ‘Do The Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions’, Stanford Law Review, 43, 497–598.
-
(1991)
Stanford Law Review
, vol.43
, pp. 497-598
-
-
Alexander, J.C.1
-
2
-
-
23044528233
-
Securities Price Consequences of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Related Events
-
Ali, Ashiq&SanjayKallapur(2001), ‘Securities Price Consequences of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Related Events’, The Accounting Review, 76(3), 431–60.
-
(2001)
The Accounting Review
, vol.76
, Issue.3
, pp. 431-460
-
-
Ali, A.1
Kallapur, S.2
-
4
-
-
77955505587
-
Lying and Getting Caught: An Empirical Study of the Effect of Securities Class Action Settlements on Targeted Firms
-
Bai, Lynn, James D.Cox&RandallThomas(2010), ‘Lying and Getting Caught: An Empirical Study of the Effect of Securities Class Action Settlements on Targeted Firms’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158, 1877–1914.
-
(2010)
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
, vol.158
, pp. 1877-1914
-
-
Bai, L.1
Cox, J.D.2
Thomas, R.3
-
6
-
-
85031027423
-
Shareholder Litigation: Share Price Movements, News Releases and Settlement Amounts
-
Beck, James D.&SanjaiBhagat(1997), ‘Shareholder Litigation: Share Price Movements, News Releases and Settlement Amounts’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 563–86.
-
(1997)
Managerial and Decision Economics
, vol.18
, pp. 563-586
-
-
Beck, J.D.1
Bhagat, S.2
-
7
-
-
0000787258
-
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
-
Becker, Gary(1968), ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.
-
(1968)
Journal of Political Economy
, vol.76
, pp. 169-217
-
-
Becker, G.1
-
10
-
-
0347304608
-
Fraud in the New Issues Market: Empirical Evidence on Securities Class Actions
-
Bohn, James and StephenChoi(1996), ‘Fraud in the New Issues Market: Empirical Evidence on Securities Class Actions’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144, 903–82.
-
(1996)
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
, vol.144
, pp. 903-982
-
-
Bohn, J.1
Choi, S.2
-
14
-
-
17244369496
-
The Evidence on Securities Class Actions
-
Choi, Stephen J.(2004), ‘The Evidence on Securities Class Actions’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 1465–1526.
-
(2004)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.57
, pp. 1465-1526
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
-
15
-
-
78649553194
-
Do Institutions Matter? The Impact of the Lead Plaintiff Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
-
Choi, Stephen J., Jill E.Fisch&Adam C.Pritchard (2005), ‘Do Institutions Matter? The Impact of the Lead Plaintiff Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’, Washington University Law Quarterly, 83, 869–906.
-
(2005)
Washington University Law Quarterly
, vol.83
, pp. 869-906
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
Fisch, J.E.2
Pritchard, A.C.3
-
16
-
-
33845758014
-
Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes During the First Decade after the PSLRA
-
Choi, Stephen J.&Robert B.Thompson(2006), ‘Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes During the First Decade after the PSLRA’, Columbia Law Review, 106, 1489–1533.
-
(2006)
Columbia Law Review
, vol.106
, pp. 1489-1533
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
Thompson, R.B.2
-
17
-
-
34548213832
-
Do The Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?
-
Choi, Stephen J.(2007), ‘Do The Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 23, 598–626.
-
(2007)
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization
, vol.23
, pp. 598-626
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
-
18
-
-
44149091910
-
On Beyond CalPERS: Survey Evidence on the Developing Role of Public Pension Funds in Corporate Governance
-
Choi, Stephen J.&Jill E.Fisch(2008), ‘On Beyond CalPERS: Survey Evidence on the Developing Role of Public Pension Funds in Corporate Governance’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 61, 315–54.
-
(2008)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.61
, pp. 315-354
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
Fisch, J.E.2
-
19
-
-
78249233403
-
The Screening Effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
-
Choi, Stephen J., Karen K.Nelson&A.C.Pritchard(2009), ‘The Screening Effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6, 35–68.
-
(2009)
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
, vol.6
, pp. 35-68
-
-
Choi, S.J.1
Nelson, K.K.2
Pritchard, A.C.3
-
20
-
-
62449114206
-
Understanding the Plaintiffs Attorney: The Implications of Economic Theory for Private Enforcement Through Class and Derivative Actions’
-
Coffee, Jr., John C.(1986), ‘Understanding the Plaintiffs’ Attorney: The Implications of Economic Theory for Private Enforcement Through Class and Derivative Actions’, Columbia Law Review, 86, 669–727.
-
(1986)
Columbia Law Review
, vol.86
, pp. 669-727
-
-
Coffee, J.C.1
-
22
-
-
72049097741
-
Leaving Money on the Table; Do Institutional Investors Fail to File Claims in Securities Class Actions
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2002), ‘Leaving Money on the Table; Do Institutional Investors Fail to File Claims in Securities Class Actions’, Washington University Law Quarterly, 80, 855–82.
-
(2002)
Washington University Law Quarterly
, vol.80
, pp. 855-882
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
23
-
-
3142699387
-
SEC Enforcement Heuristics: An Empirical Inquiry
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2003), ‘SEC Enforcement Heuristics: An Empirical Inquiry’, Duke Law Journal, 53, 737–80.
-
(2003)
Duke Law Journal
, vol.53
, pp. 737-780
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
24
-
-
18144373826
-
Public and Private Enforcement of the Securities Laws: Have Things Changed Since Enron?
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2005a), ‘Public and Private Enforcement of the Securities Laws: Have Things Changed Since Enron?’, Notre Dame Law Review, 80, 893–908.
-
(2005)
Notre Dame Law Review
, vol.80
, pp. 893-908
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
25
-
-
30144439983
-
Letting Billions Slip Through Your Fingers: Empirical Evidence and Legal Implications of the Failure of Financial Institutions to Participate in Securities Class Action Settlements
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2005b), ‘Letting Billions Slip Through Your Fingers: Empirical Evidence and Legal Implications of the Failure of Financial Institutions to Participate in Securities Class Action Settlements’, Stanford Law Review, 58, 411–54.
-
(2005)
Stanford Law Review
, vol.58
, pp. 411-454
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
26
-
-
33845739750
-
Does the Plaintiff Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Class Actions
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2006), ‘Does the Plaintiff Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Class Actions’, Columbia Law Review, 106, 1587–1640.
-
(2006)
Columbia Law Review
, vol.106
, pp. 1587-1640
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
27
-
-
44149090265
-
There Are Plaintiffs and … There Are Plaintiffs: An Empirical Analysis of Securities Class Action Settlements
-
Cox, James D., Randall S.Thomas&LynnBai(2008), ‘There Are Plaintiffs and … There Are Plaintiffs: An Empirical Analysis of Securities Class Action Settlements’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 61, 355–86.
-
(2008)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.61
, pp. 355-386
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
Bai, L.3
-
28
-
-
77953277388
-
Mapping the American Shareholder Litigation Experience: A Survey of Empirical Studies of the Enforcement of the U.S. Securities Law
-
Cox, James D.&Randall S.Thomas(2009a), ‘Mapping the American Shareholder Litigation Experience: A Survey of Empirical Studies of the Enforcement of the U.S. Securities Law’, European Company and Financial Law Review, 6, 164–203.
-
(2009)
European Company and Financial Law Review
, vol.6
, pp. 164-203
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
29
-
-
79958731656
-
Do Differences in Pleading Standards Cause Forum Shopping in Securities Class Actions?: Doctrinal and Empirical Analyses
-
Cox, James D., Randall S.Thomas&LynnBai (2009b), ‘Do Differences in Pleading Standards Cause Forum Shopping in Securities Class Actions?: Doctrinal and Empirical Analyses’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2009, 421–54.
-
(2009)
Wisconsin Law Review
, pp. 421-454
-
-
Cox, J.D.1
Thomas, R.S.2
Bai, L.3
-
32
-
-
78649859727
-
Corporate Governance in the Courtroom: An Empirical Analysis
-
Erickson, Jessica(2010), ‘Corporate Governance in the Courtroom: An Empirical Analysis’, William and Mary Law Review, 51, 1749–1832.
-
(2010)
William and Mary Law Review
, vol.51
, pp. 1749-1832
-
-
Erickson, J.1
-
33
-
-
18944401883
-
Restoring Trust After Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter?
-
Farber, David B.(2005), ‘Restoring Trust After Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter?’, The Accounting Review, 80, 539–61.
-
(2005)
The Accounting Review
, vol.80
, pp. 539-561
-
-
Farber, D.B.1
-
34
-
-
0006867330
-
Litigation Risk for Auditors and Society
-
Green, D.L.(1999), ‘Litigation Risk for Auditors and Society’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10, 339–53.
-
(1999)
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
, vol.10
, pp. 339-353
-
-
Green, D.L.1
-
35
-
-
67849135038
-
Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence
-
Jackson, Howell E.&Mark J.Roe(2009), ‘Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence’, Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 207–38.
-
(2009)
Journal of Financial Economics
, vol.91
, pp. 207-238
-
-
Jackson, H.E.1
Roe, M.J.2
-
36
-
-
0005636245
-
Shareholder Wealth Effects of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
-
Johnson, Marilyn F., RonKasznik&Karen K.Nelson(2000), ‘Shareholder Wealth Effects of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995’, Review of Accounting Studies, 5, 217–33.
-
(2000)
Review of Accounting Studies
, vol.5
, pp. 217-233
-
-
Johnson, M.F.1
Kasznik, R.2
Nelson, K.K.3
-
37
-
-
0041681738
-
In re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting from the Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
-
Johnson, Marilyn F., Karen K.Nelson&A.C.Pritchard(2000), ‘In re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting from the Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’, Southern California Law Review, 73, 773–810.
-
(2000)
Southern California Law Review
, vol.73
, pp. 773-810
-
-
Johnson, M.F.1
Nelson, K.K.2
Pritchard, A.C.3
-
38
-
-
0035639406
-
The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward Looking Information by High Technology Firms
-
Johnson, Marilyn F., RonKasznik&Karen K.Nelson(2001), ‘The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward Looking Information by High Technology Firms’, Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 297–327.
-
(2001)
Journal of Accounting Research
, vol.39
, pp. 297-327
-
-
Johnson, M.F.1
Kasznik, R.2
Nelson, K.K.3
-
39
-
-
34548256964
-
Do the Merits Matter More? The Impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
-
Johnson, Marilyn F., Karen K.Nelson&A.C.Pritchard(2006), ‘Do the Merits Matter More? The Impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 23, 627–52.
-
(2006)
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization
, vol.23
, pp. 627-652
-
-
Johnson, M.F.1
Nelson, K.K.2
Pritchard, A.C.3
-
40
-
-
58449129115
-
Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter
-
Johnson, Shane A., Harley E.Ryan Jr., &Yisong S.Tian(2009), ‘Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter’, Review of Finance, 13, 115–45.
-
(2009)
Review of Finance
, vol.13
, pp. 115-145
-
-
Johnson, S.A.1
Ryan Jr, H.E.2
Tian, Y.S.3
-
41
-
-
1842697208
-
An Empirical Examination of the Resolution of Shareholder Derivative and Class Action Lawsuits
-
Jones, Thomas M.(1980), ‘An Empirical Examination of the Resolution of Shareholder Derivative and Class Action Lawsuits’, Boston University Law Review, 60, 542–74.
-
(1980)
Boston University Law Review
, vol.60
, pp. 542-574
-
-
Jones, T.M.1
-
42
-
-
85050840323
-
The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud
-
Karpoff, Jonathan M.&John R. Lott Jr.(1993), ‘The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud’, Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 757–802.
-
(1993)
Journal of Law and Economics
, vol.36
, pp. 757-802
-
-
Karpoff, J.M.1
Lott Jr, J.R.2
-
44
-
-
43849103859
-
The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books
-
Karpoff, Jonathan M., D.Scott Lee&Gerald S.Martin(2008a), ‘The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 581–611.
-
(2008)
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
, vol.43
, pp. 581-611
-
-
Karpoff, J.M.1
Scott Lee, D.2
Martin, G.S.3
-
45
-
-
43849098242
-
The Consequences to Managers for Financial Misrepresentation
-
Karpoff, Jonathan M., D.Scott Lee&Gerald S.Martin(2008b), ‘The Consequences to Managers for Financial Misrepresentation’, Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 193–215.
-
(2008)
Journal of Financial Economics
, vol.88
, pp. 193-215
-
-
Karpoff, J.M.1
Scott Lee, D.2
Martin, G.S.3
-
47
-
-
33845700222
-
Governance and Performance Changes after Accusations of Corporate Fraud
-
Marciukaityte, Dalia, Samuel H.Szewczyk, HaticeUzun&RajVarma(2006), ‘Governance and Performance Changes after Accusations of Corporate Fraud’, Financial Analysts Journal, 62, 32–41.
-
(2006)
Financial Analysts Journal
, vol.62
, pp. 32-41
-
-
Marciukaityte, D.1
Szewczyk, S.H.2
Uzun, H.3
Varma, R.4
-
52
-
-
44849110073
-
Executive Pay and Shareholder Litigation
-
Peng, Lin&AilsaRoell(2008), ‘Executive Pay and Shareholder Litigation’, Review of Finance, 12, 141–84.
-
(2008)
Review of Finance
, vol.12
, pp. 141-184
-
-
Peng, L.1
Roell, A.2
-
53
-
-
0348226406
-
Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work?
-
Perino, Michael A.(2003), ‘Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work?’, University of Illinois Law Review, 2003, 913–78.
-
(2003)
University of Illinois Law Review
, vol.2003
, pp. 913-978
-
-
Perino, M.A.1
-
56
-
-
34548206033
-
Sale (2005), ‘What Counts As Fraud? An Empirical Study of Motions to Dismiss Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
-
Pritchard, Adam C.&HillaryA.Sale (2005), ‘What Counts As Fraud? An Empirical Study of Motions to Dismiss Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 125–49.
-
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
, vol.2
, pp. 125-149
-
-
Pritchard, A.C.1
Hillary, A.2
-
57
-
-
0002876742
-
The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation?
-
Romano, Roberta(1991), ‘The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation?’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7, 55–87.
-
(1991)
Journal of Law, Economics and Organization
, vol.7
, pp. 55-87
-
-
Romano, R.1
-
58
-
-
84881860013
-
Securities Class Action Settlements: 2007 Review and Analysis
-
Simmons, Laura E.&Ellen M.Ryan(2008), ‘Securities Class Action Settlements: 2007 Review and Analysis’, Cornerstone Research, 10.
-
(2008)
Cornerstone Research
, pp. 10
-
-
Simmons, L.E.1
Ryan, E.M.2
-
59
-
-
85040410576
-
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The Stock Market Casts its Vote
-
Spiess, D. Katherine&Paula A.Tkac(1997), ‘The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The Stock Market Casts its Vote’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 545–61.
-
(1997)
Managerial and Decision Economics
, vol.18
, pp. 545-561
-
-
Spiess, D.K.1
Tkac, P.A.2
-
61
-
-
33845782428
-
Cataclysmic Liability Risk Among Big Four Auditors
-
Talley, Eric L.(2006), ‘Cataclysmic Liability Risk Among Big Four Auditors’, Columbia Law Review, 106, 1641–97.
-
(2006)
Columbia Law Review
, vol.106
, pp. 1641-1697
-
-
Talley, E.L.1
-
62
-
-
34548216531
-
-
USC L. Sch., Olin Research Paper No. 04–7, (last accessed October 2011)
-
Talley, Eric L.&GudrunJohnsen (2004), ‘Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation and Securities Litigation’, USC L. Sch., Olin Research Paper No. 04–7, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=536963(last accessed October 2011).
-
(2004)
Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation and Securities Litigation
-
-
Talley, E.L.1
Johnsen, G.2
-
63
-
-
84957956720
-
The Economic Reality of Securities Class Action Litigation
-
October 26, 2005
-
Thakor, Anjan V., Jeffrey S.Nielsen&David A.Gulley(2005), ‘The Economic Reality of Securities Class Action Litigation’, Navigant Consulting, prepared for US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, October 26, 2005.
-
(2005)
Navigant Consulting, Prepared for US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
-
-
Thakor, A.V.1
Nielsen, J.S.2
Gulley, D.A.3
-
64
-
-
79957476080
-
Preemption and Federalism in Corporate Governance: Protecting Shareholder Rights to Vote, Sell and Sue
-
Thompson, Robert B.(1999), ‘Preemption and Federalism in Corporate Governance: Protecting Shareholder Rights to Vote, Sell and Sue’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 62, 215–42.
-
(1999)
Law and Contemporary Problems
, vol.62
, pp. 215-242
-
-
Thompson, R.B.1
-
65
-
-
3142783099
-
The New Look of Shareholder Litigation: Acquisition-Oriented Class Actions
-
Thompson, Robert B.&Randall S.Thomas(2004a), ‘The New Look of Shareholder Litigation: Acquisition-Oriented Class Actions’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 133–210.
-
(2004)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.57
, pp. 133-210
-
-
Thompson, R.B.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
66
-
-
17244381001
-
The Public and Private Faces of Derivative Lawsuits
-
Thompson, Robert B.&Randall S.Thomas(2004b), ‘The Public and Private Faces of Derivative Lawsuits’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 1745–93.
-
(2004)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.57
, pp. 1745-1793
-
-
Thompson, R.B.1
Thomas, R.S.2
-
67
-
-
17244375457
-
File Early, then Free Ride: How Delaware Law (Mis)Shapes Shareholder Class Actions
-
Weiss, Elliott J.&Lawrence J.White(2004), ‘File Early, then Free Ride: How Delaware Law (Mis)Shapes Shareholder Class Actions’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 1797–1882.
-
(2004)
Vanderbilt Law Review
, vol.57
, pp. 1797-1882
-
-
Weiss, E.J.1
White, L.J.2
|