Patents and industry standards

Patents and Industry Standards

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Park, Jae Hun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881801561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (159)

1. Adams, John N., Julian J.B. Hickey and K.V. Prichard Jones (2006), Franchising, 5th edn, Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing
2. Anderman, Steven D. (1998), EC Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press
3. Begg, David, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch (2005), Economics, 8th edn, London: The McGraw-Hill Companies
4. Bently, Lionel and Brad Sherman (2004), Intellectual Property Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Blind, Kunt (2004), The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing
6. De Vries, Henk J. (1999), Standardization: A Business Approach to the Role of National Standardization Organizations, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers
7. Grindley, Peter (2002), Standards, Strategy, and Policy: Cases and Stories, Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. Gutterman, Alan S. (1997), Innovation and Competition Policy: A Comparative Study of the Regulation of Patent Licensing and Collaborative Research and Development in the United States and the European Community, London: Kluwer Law International
9. Jones, Alison and Brenda Sufrin (2008), EC Competition Law, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press
10. Kingston, William (ed.) (1987), Direct Protection of Innovation, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers
11. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Henderson and Spalding
12. Shy, Oz (2001), The Economics of Network Industries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Swann, G. and M. Peter (2000), The Economics of Standardization: Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate, London: Department of Trade and Industry
14. Torremans, Paul L.C. (2005), Holyoak and Torremans: Intellectual Property Law, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press
15. Tritton, Guy (2002), Intellectual Property in Europe, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell
16. Whish, Richard (2003), Competition Law, 5th edn, London: LexisNexis UK
17. Andersen, Birgitte (2003), 'The Rationales for Intellectual Property Rights in the Electronic Age'
18. Andersen, Birgitte (2004), 'If "Intellectual Property Rights" is the Answer, What is the Question? Revisiting the Patent Controversies', Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13 (5), 417-42
19. Derclaye, Estelle (2004), 'The IMS Health Decision and the Reconciliation of Copyright and Competition Law', European Law Review, 29, 687-97
20. Furse, Mark (1995), 'The "Essential Facilities" Doctrine in Community Law', European Competition Law Review, 16 (8), 469-72
21. Good, Diana (1991), '1992 and Product Standards: AConflict with Intellectual Property Rights', European Intellectual Property Review, 398-403
22. Iversen, Eric James, Esten Oversjoen and Haakon Thue Lie (2004), 'Standardization, Innovation and IPR', Telektronikk, 2, 65-79
23. Kingston, William, 'Meeting Nelson's Concerns about Intellectual Property', available from http://www.druid.dk/conferences/nw/paper1/kingston.pdf
24. Kronz, Hermann (1983), 'Patent Protection for Innovation: A Model', Parts I and II, European Intellectual Property Review 7, 178-83, 206-10
25. Liotard, Isabelle and Rudi Bekkers (1999), 'European Standards for Mobile Communications: The Tense Relationship between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights', European Intellectual Property Review, 21 (3), 110-26
26. Narciso, Alessandra and Paul L.C. Torremans (2005), 'IMS Health or the Question Whether Copyright still Deserves a Specific Approach in a Market Economy?', in Developments in the Economics of Copyright, edited by Lisa N. Takeyama, Wendy J. Gordon and Ruth Towse, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 142-58
27. Ong, Burton (2004), 'Anticompetitive Refusal to Grant Copyright Licences: Reflections on the IMS Saga', European Intellectual Property Review, 26, (11), 505
28. Reichman, Jerome H. (2001), 'Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation', in Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, edited by Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss and Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23-53
29. Schiessl, Martin (1993), 'The New European Telecommunications Standards Institute Policy: Conflicts Between Standardisation and Intellectual Property Rights', European Intellectual Property Review, 15 (8), 263-6
30. Shurmer, Mark and Gary Lea (1995), 'Telecommunications Standardization and Intellectual Property Rights: A Fundamental Dilemma?', StandardView, 3 (2), 50-59
31. Stothers, Christopher (2004), 'IMS Health and Its Implications for Compulsory Licensing in Europe', European Intellectual Property Review, 26 (10), 467-72
32. Tuckett, Roger (1992), 'Access to Public Standards: Interoperability Revisited', European Intellectual Property Review 14 (12), 423-7
33. Bork, Robert H. (1993), The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, Oxford: The Free Press
34. Cooter, Robert and Thomas Ulen (2000), Law and Economics, 3rd edn, New York: Addison Wesley Longman
35. Hovenkamp, Herbert, Mark D. Janis and Mark A. Lemley (2002), IP and Antitrust, Vol. 1, New York: Aspen Law & Business
36. Hovenkamp, Herbert, Mark D. Janis and Mark A. Lemley (2005), IP and Antitrust, Vol. 2, New York: Aspen Law & Business
37. Posner, Richard A. (2007), Economic Analysis of Law, 7th edn, New York: Wolters Kluwer
38. Scherer, F.M. (1977), The Economic Effects of Compulsory Patent Licensing, The Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, New York: New York University
39. Scherer, F.M. (1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd edn, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company
40. Scherer, F.M. and David Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edn, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
41. Shapiro, Carl and Hal R. Varian (1999), Information Rules, Boston: Harvard Business School Press
42. Ahlborn, Christian, David S. Evans and Jorge Padilla (2005), 'The Logic and Limits of the "Exceptional Circumstances Test" in Magill and IMS Health', Fordham International Law Journal, 28, 1109
43. Areeda, Phillip (1989), 'Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles', Antitrust Law Journal, 58, 841
44. Arquit, Kevin J., Arman Y. Oruc and Richard Wolfram (1998), 'Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Standards and Interoperability', Practising Law Institute 524, 200
45. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962), 'Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention', in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, p. 609
46. Ayres, Ian and Paul Klemperer (1999), 'Limiting Patentees' Market Power without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies', Michigan Law Review, 97, 985
47. Ayres, Ian and Eric Talley (1995a), 'Distinguishing between Consensual and Nonconsensual Advantages of Liability Rules', Yale Law Journal, 105, 235
48. Ayres, Ian, and Eric Talley (1995b), 'Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade', Yale Law Journal, 104, 1027
49. Baker, Jonathan B. (1995), 'Fringe Firms and Incentives to Innovate', Antitrust Law Journal, 63, 621-41
50. Balto, David A. and Andrew M. Wolman (2003), 'Intellectual Property and Antitrust: General Principles', IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 43, 395
51. Barton, John H. (1997), 'Patents and Antitrust: ARethinking in Light of Patent Breadth and Sequential Innovation', Antitrust Law Journal, 65, 449
52. Barton, John H. (2000), 'Reforming the Patent System', Science, 1933-4
53. Baseman, Kenneth C., Frederick R. Warren-Boulton and Glenn A. Woroch (1995), 'Microsoft Plays Hardball: The Use of Exclusionary Pricing and Technical Incompatibility to Maintain Monopoly Power in Markets for Operating System Software', Antitrust Bulletin, Summer, 265-315
54. Calabresi, Guido and A. Douglas Melamed (1972), 'Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral', Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089
55. Candeub, Adam (2005), 'Trinko and Re-grounding the Refusal to Deal Doctrine', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 66, 821
56. Coase, Ronald H. (1960), 'The Problem of Social Cost', Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1
57. Cohen, Julie E. (2001), 'Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry', California Law Review, 89, 1
58. Curran, P.D. (2003), 'Standard-Setting Organizations: Patents, Price Fixing, and Per Se Legality', University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 983
59. David, Paul A. (1985), 'Clio and the Economics of QWERTY', The American Economic Review, 75 (2), 332-7
60. David, Paul A. (1987), 'Some New Standards for the Economics of Standardization in the Information Age', in Economic Policy and Technological Performance, edited by Partha Dasgupta and Paul Stoneman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206-39
61. David, Paul A. and Shane Greenstein (1990), 'The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research', Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1, 3
62. David, Paul A. and W. Edward Steinmueller (1994), 'Economics of Compatibility Standards and Competition in Telecommunication Networks', Information Economics and Policy, 6, 217-41
63. De Vellis, James C. (2003), 'Patenting Industry Standards: Balancing the Rights of Patent Holders with the Need for Industry-Wide Standards', AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 31, 301
64. Donahey, Teague I. (1997), 'Termainal Railroad Revisited: Using the Essential Facilities Doctrine to Ensure Accessibility to Internet Software Standards', AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 25, 277
65. Dumortier, Jos and Mark Hyland (1999), 'The Ericsson/Qualcomm Dispute and the Essential Facilities Doctrine in the Mobile Telecoms Sector', Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 5 (6), 150-57
66. Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1989), 'Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use', University of Chicago Law Review, 56, 1017
67. Ellis, Williams (1995), 'Intellectual Property Rights and High Technology Standards', in Standard Policy for Information Infrastructure, edited by Brian Kahin and Janet Abbate, Cambridge: The MIT Press
68. Farrell, Joseph (1989), 'Standardization and Intellectual Property', Jurimetrics Journal, 30, 35
69. Farrell, Joseph (1996), 'Creating Local Competition', Federal Communications Law Journal, 49, 201
70. Farrell, Joseph and Garth Saloner (1985), 'Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation', The RAND Journal of Economics, 16 (1), 70-83
71. Farrell, Joseph and Garth Saloner (1987), 'Competition, Compatibility and Standards: The Economics of Horses, Penguins and Lemmings', in Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, edited by H. Landis Gabel, Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 1-21
72. Fauver, Cole M. (1988), 'Compulsory Patent Licensing in the United States: An Idea whose Time has Come', Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 8, 666
73. Feldman, Robin Cooper (1999), 'Defensive Leveraging in Antitrust', Georgetown Law Journal, 87, 2079
74. Forrester, Ian S. (2005), 'Article 82: Remedies in Search of Theories?', Fordham International Law Journal, 28, 919
75. Galliani, William S. (1990), 'Patent Infringement Amidst Rapidly Evolving Technologies: New Equivalents, the Doctrine of Equivalents and the Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents', Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, 6, 75
76. Gerber, David J. (1988), 'Rethinking the Monopolist's Duty to Deal: A Legal and Economic Critique of the Doctrine of "Essential Facilities"', Virginia Law Review, 74, 1069
77. Gordon, Wendy J. (1982), 'Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors', Columbia Law Review, 82, 1600
78. Greenstein, Shane (1992), 'Invisible Hands and Visible Advisors: An Economic Interpretation of Standardization', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (8), 538-49
79. Greenstein, Shane (2001), 'The Three Coms of the Microsoft Antitrust Suit: Competition Policy, Commercial Experimentation, and Computing Platforms', UWLA Law Review, 32, 95-102
80. Hardin, Garrett (1968), 'The Tragedy of the Commons', Science, 162, 1243-8
81. Hovenkamp, Herbert (1985), 'Antitrust Policy After Chicago', Michigan Law Review, 84, 213
82. Hovenkamp, Herbert, Mark D. Janis and Mark A. Lemley (2006), 'Unilateral Refusals to License', Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2, 1
83. Julian-Arnold, Gianna (1993), 'International Compulsory Licensing: The Rationales and the Reality', IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 33, 349
84. Kaplow, Louis (1984), 'The Patent-Antitrust Intersection: A Reappraisal', Harvard Law Review, 97, 1813
85. Kaplow, Louis (1985), 'Extension of Monopoly Power through Leverage', Columbia Law Review, 85, 515
86. Kaplow, Louis and Steven Shavell (1995), 'Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley', Yale Law Journal, 105, 221
87. Kaplow, Louis and Steven Shavell (1996), 'Property Rules Versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis', Harvard Law Review, 109, 713
88. Katz, Michael L. (2002), 'Intellectual Property Rights and Antitrust Policy: Four Principles for a Complex World', Journal of Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 1, 325
89. Kingston, William (1994), 'Compulsory Licensing with Capital Payments as an Alternative to Grants of Monopoly in Intellectual Property', Research Policy, 23, 661-72
90. Kingston, William (2001), 'Innovation Needs Patents Reform', Research Policy, 30, 403-23
91. Kitch, Edmund W. (1977), 'The Nature and Future of the Patent System', Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 265
92. Kitch, Edmund W. (2000), 'Elementary and Persistent Errors in the Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property', Vanderbilt Law Review, 53, 1727
93. Kobak, James B. (2005), 'Intellectual Property, Refusals to Deal and the U.S Antitrust Laws', Practising Law Institute, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series 832, p. 385
94. Korah, Valentine (2002), 'The Interface between Intellectual Property and Antitrust: The European Experience', Antitrust Law Journal, 69, 801
95. Landers, Amy L. (2006), 'Let the Game Begin: Incentives to Innovation in the New Economy of Intellectual Property Law', Santa Clara Law Review, 46, 307
96. Langlois, Richard N. (1999), 'Technological Standards, Innovation, and Essential Facilities: Toward a Schumpeterian Post-Chicago Approach', paper presented at the George Mason University conference on Dynamic Competition and Antitrust, Washington, DC
97. Lemley, Mark A. (1996), 'Antitrust and the Internet Standardization Problem', Connecticut Law Review, 28, 1041
98. Lemley, Mark A. (1997), 'The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law', Texas Law Review, 75, 989
99. Lemley, Mark A. (2002), 'Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations', California Law Review, 90, 1889
100. Lemley, Mark A. (2003), 'Policy Levers in Patent Law', Virginia Law Review, 89, 1575
101. Lemley, Mark A. (2004), 'Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property', University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 129
102. Lemley, Mark A. and David McGowan (1998), 'Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects', California Law Review, 86, 479-611
103. Levin, Richard C. et al. (1987), 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 3, 783-831
104. Lim, Daryl (2007), 'Copyright under Seige: An Economic Analysis of the Essential Facilities Doctrine and the Compulsory Licensing of Copyrighted Works', Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 17, 481
105. Llobet, Gerard, Hugo Hopenhayn and Matthew Mitchell (2000), 'Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents and Buyouts', Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 273, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
106. Machlup, Fritz (1958), 'An Economic Review of the Patent System', Study of the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, pp. 1-89
107. McGowan, David (1996), 'Regulating Competition in the Information Age: Computer Software as an Essential Facility under the Sherman Act', Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 18, 771
108. McMahon, Kathryn (2007), 'Interoperability: "Indispensibility" and "Special Responsibility" in High Technology Markets', Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 9, 123
109. Menell, Peter S. (1987), 'Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software', Stanford Law Review, 39, 1329
110. Merges, Robert P. (1994a), 'Intellectual Property Rights and Bargaining Breakdown: The Case of Blocking Patents', Tennessee Law Review, 62, 75
111. Merges, Robert P. (1994b), 'Of Property Rules, Coase, and Intellectual Property', Columbia Law Review, 94, 2655
112. Merges, Robert P. (1996), 'Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations', California Law Review, 84, 1293
113. Merges, Robert P. (1999), 'Who Owns the Charles River Bridge? Intellectual Property and Competition in the Software Industry', available at http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3704w3hn
114. Merges, Robert P. and Richard R. Nelson (1990), 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope', Columbia Law Review, 90, 839
115. Merges, Robert P. and Richard R. Nelson (1994), 'On Limiting or Encouraging Rivalry in Technical Progress: The Effect of Patent Scope Decisions', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 1-24
116. Meyers, Christopher J. (2005), 'European Union Competition Law and Intellectual Property Licensing: Trans-Atlantic Convergence and Compulsory Licensing', Practising Law Institute 842, 135
117. Mueller, Janice M. (2001), 'Patenting Industry Standards', John Marshall Law Review, 34, 897
118. O'Donnell, S.W. (2004), 'Unified Theory of Antitrust Counterclaims in Patent Litigation', Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 9, 8
119. O'Rourke, Maureen A. (2000), 'Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law', Columbia Law Review, 100, 1177
120. Oettinger, Nicolas (2001), 'In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation', Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16, 323
121. Opi, Sergio Baches (2001), 'The Application of the Essential Facilities Doctrine to Intellectual Property Licensing in the European Union and the United States: Are Intellectual Property Rights Still Sacrosanct?', Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 11, 409
122. Papciak, W. Greg (1999), 'Sherman Act Violations: Essential Facilities Doctrine - Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.', Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14, 323
123. Piraino, Thomas A. (2000), 'Identifying Monopolists' Illegal Conduct Under the Sherman Act', New York University Law Review, 75, 809-92
124. Pitofsky, Robert, Donna Patterson and Jonathan Hooks (2002), 'The Essential Facilities Doctrine under U.S. Antitrust Law', Antitrust Law Journal, 70, 443
125. Posner, Richard A. (1979), 'The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 925
126. Powell, Mark D. (2002), 'Competition Law and Innovation: The Interface between Competition Law and Intellectual Property', Practising Law Institute, 708, 57
127. Preovolos, Penelope A. (1999), 'Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Standards and Interoperability', Practising Law Institute, 566, 251-79
128. Pritikin, David T. and Bruce M. Zessar (1995), 'The Sham Litigation Doctrine in Patent Litigation: The Nexus Bad Faith Enforcement of Patent Rights and the Antitrust Laws', Practising Law Institute, 414, 661
129. Puhala, James P. (1994), 'Antitrust Law-Berkey Photo and Alaska Airlines: Independent Approaches to Monopoly Leveraging Claims', Western New England Law Review, 16, 111
130. Reichman, Jerome. H. (1994-95), 'Charting the Collapse of the Patent-Copyright Dichotomy: Premises for a Restructured International Intellectual Property System', Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 13, 475
131. Sabido, Peter David G. (2003-04), 'Defending against Patent Infringement Suits in Standard-Setting Organizations: Rambus Inc. v Infineon Technologies', Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 13, 635
132. Samuelson, Pamela (2007), 'Patent Reform through the Courts', Communications of the ACM, 19
133. Samuelson, Pamela and Suzanne Scotchmer (2002), 'The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering', Yale Law Journal, 111, 1575
134. Schallop, Michael J. (2000), 'The IPR Paradox: Leveraging Intellectual Property Rights to Encourage Interoperability in the Network Computing Age', AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 28, 195
135. Scherer, F.M. (1987), 'Antitrust, Efficiency, and Progress', New York University Law Review, 62, 998-1019
136. Schneck, David M. (1998), 'Setting the Standard: Problems Presented to Patent Holders Participating in the Creation of Industry Uniformity Standards', Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 20, 641-62
137. Scotchmer, Suzanne (1991), 'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law', The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 29-41
138. Shapiro, Carl (1999), 'Exclusivity in Network Industries', George Mason Law Review, 7, 673
139. Shapiro, Carl and Michael L. Katz (1985), 'Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility', The American Economic Review, 75 (3), 424-40
140. Shelanski, Howard A. (2000), 'Competition and Deployment of New Technology in U.S. Telecommunications', University of Chicago Legal Forum, 85-118
141. Sheremata, Willow A. (1997), 'Barriers to Innovation: a Monopoly, Network Externalities, and the Speed of Innovation', The Antitrust Bulletin, 42, 937-72
142. Smith, Steven R. (2008), 'Gresham's Law in Legal Education', Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 17, 171
143. Steinman, Melissa Landau (2005), 'Standards, Antitrust and Intellectual Property: Standard-Setting at the Crossroads', Practising Law Institute, 832, 241
144. Tassey, Gregory (2000), 'Standardization in Technology-based Markets', Research Policy, 29, 587
145. Thurow, Lester C. (1997), 'Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights', Harvard Business Review, September-October, 95-103
146. Tripsas, Mary (1997), 'Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry', Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119-42
147. Turner, Julie S. (1998), 'The Nonmanufacturing Patent Owner: Toward a Theory of Efficient Infringement', California Law Review, 86, 179
148. Turney, James (2005), 'Defining the Limits of the EU Essential Facilities Doctrine on Intellectual Property Rights: The Primacy of Securing Optimal Innovations', Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 3, 179
149. Valach, Anthony P. (2005), 'TRIPS: Protecting the Rights of Patent Holders and Addressing Public Health Issues in Developing Countries', Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 4, 156
150. Wagner, Dana R. (2000), 'The Keepers of the Gates: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, and the Regulatory Implications of Systems Technology', Hastings Law Journal, 51, 1073
151. Weiser, Philip J. (2003), 'The Internet, Innovation, and Intellectual Property Policy', Columbia Law Review, 103, 534
152. Yosick, Joseph A. (2001), 'Compulsory Patent Licensing for Efficient Use of Inventions', University of Illinois Law Review, 1275
153. ANSI Patent Policy 2007 (cited 30 December 2008), available from http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/Forms/DispForm.aspx?ID=6 376&RootFolder=%2fsites%2fapdl%2fDocuments%2fStandards%20Acti vities%2fAmerican%20National%20Standards%2fProcedures%2c%20Gu ides%2c%20and%20Forms&Source=http%3a%2f%2fpublicaa%2eansi%2 eorg%2fsites%2fapdl%2fDocuments%2fStandards%20Activities%2fAme rican%20National%20Standards%2fProcedures%2c%20Guides%2c%20a nd%20Forms
154. Kanellos, Michael (2005), 'AMD's Market Share Gains Accelerate' (cited 19 May 2006), available from http://news.com.com/AMDs+market+share+gains+accelerate/2100-1006_3-5916167.html 'Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2006', United States Patent and Trademark Office
155. SearchSMB.com TechTarget (cited 05 April 2007), available from http://searchsmb.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid44_gci928405,00.html
156. Tsilas, Nicos L., The Perils of Imposing Compulsory IP Licensing to Achieve Interoperability (cited 24 August 2006), available from http://www. metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&artMonth=October&ar tYear=2005&EntryNo=3739
157. VESA Local Bus PCMAG.COM (cited 30 December 2008), available from http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=VL-bus&i= 54017,00.asp
158. Webster's Third New International Dictionary (1986), Vol. II, London: Merriam-Webster Inc
159. Windows History (cited 30 December 2008), available from http://www. microsoft.com/windows/winhistorydesktop.mspx