A phylogenetic analysis of the phylum Fibrobacteres

Systematic and Applied Microbiology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 376-382

  Jewell, Kelsea A ^a   Scott, Jarrod J ^b   Adams, Sandra M ^a   Suen, Garret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Fibrobacter; Fibrobacteres; Host range; Phylogeny; Rumen

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; CLADISTICS; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; FIBROBACTERES; FIBROBACTERES INTESTINALIS; HOST RANGE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYLUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE DATABASE; RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DATABASE; TAXONOMY;

FIBROBACTER; FIBROBACTER INTESTINALIS; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; FIBROBACTERES;

EID: 84881666450     PISSN: 07232020     EISSN: 16180984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aanen D.K., et al. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. PNAS 2002, 99:14887-14892.
2. Amann R., Krumholz L., Stahl D.A. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172:762-770.
3. Amann R., et al. Diversity among Fibrobacter isolates: towards a phylogenetic classification. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 15:23-31.
4. Bera-Maillet C., Ribot Y., Forano E. Fiber-degrading systems of different strains of the genus Fibrobacter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:2172-2179.
5. Briée C., Moreira D., López-García P. Archaeal and bacterial community composition of sediment and plankton from a suboxic freshwater pond. Res. Microbiol. 2007, 158:213-227.
6. Brune A., Friedrich M. Microecology of the termite gut: structure and function on a microscale. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2000, 3:263-269.
7. Bryant M., Robinson I., Chu H. Observations on the nutrition of Bacteroides succinogenes - a ruminal cellulolytic bacterium. J. Dairy Sci. 1959, 42:1831-1847.
8. Chen B.-Y., Wang H.-T. Utility of enzymes from Fibrobacter succinogenes and Prevotella ruminicola as detergent additives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35:923-930.
9. Cole J.R., et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D141-D145.
10. Dehority B.A. Isolations and characterization of several cellulolytic bacteria from in vitro rumen fermentations. J. Dairy Sci. 1963, 46:217-222.
11. DeSantis T., et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench campatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72.
12. Engelbrektson A., et al. Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J. 2010, 4:642-647.
13. Flint H.J., et al. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6:121-131.
14. Gaudet G., Cheng K.J. Use of glucose and cellobiose by 3 strains of Fibrobacter succinogenes. Repr. Nutr. Dev. 1990, 2:201s-202s.
15. Hongoh Y., et al. Phylogenetic diversity, localization, and cell morphologies of members of the candidate phylum TG3 and a subphylum in the phylum Fibrobacteres, recently discovered bacterial groups dominant in termite guts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:6780-6788.
16. Huelsenbeck J., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
17. Hungate R. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1950, 14:1-49.
18. Kim M., Morrison M., Yu Z. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 76:49-63.
19. Kobayashi Y., Shinkai T., Koike S. Ecological and physiological characterization shows that Fibrobacter succinogenes is important in rumen fiber digestion: review. Folia Microbiol. 2008, 53:195-2000.
20. Kong Y., Teather R., Forster R. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 74:612-622.
21. Kunin V., et al. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:118-123.
22. Letunic I., Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:127-128.
23. Ley R.E., et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 2008, 320:1647-1651.
24. Lin C., Stahl D.A. Taxon-specific probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacter reveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61:1348-1351.
25. Ludwig W., et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:1363-1371.
26. Macalady J.L., et al. Niche differentiation among sulfur-oxidizing bacterial populations in cave waters. ISME J. 2008, 2:590-601.
27. Maglione G., Russell J.B., Wilson D. Kinetics of cellulose digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63:665-669.
28. Matsui H., Ban-Tokuda T., Wakita M. Detection of fiber-digesting bacteria in the ceca of ostrich using specific primer sets. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 60:112-116.
29. McDonald J.E., et al. Molecular biological detection and quantification of novel Fibrobacter populations in freshwater lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:5148-5152.
30. McDonald J.E., et al. Detection of novel Fibrobacter populations in landfill sites and determination of their relative abundance via quantitative PCR. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10:1310-1319.
31. Monteils V., et al. Potential core species and satellite species in the bacterial community within the rabbit caecum. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 66:620-629.
32. Montgomery L., Flesher B., Stahl D. Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1988, 38:430-435.
33. Montgomery L., Macy J. Characterization of rat cecum cellulolytic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 44:1435-1443.
34. Nüsslein K., Tiedje J. Soil bacterial community shift correlated with change from forest to pasture vegetation in a tropical soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:3622-3626.
35. Ohkuma M., et al. Coevolution of symbiotic systems of termites and their gut microorganisms. RIKEN Rev. 2001, 41:73-74.
36. Percent S.F., et al. Bacterial community structure of acid-impacted lakes: what controls diversity?. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:1856-1868.
37. Pruesse E., et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB 2007, 35.:21.
38. Rambaut A. FigTree v1.3.1 http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.
39. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
40. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
41. Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:1501-1506.
42. Schloss P.D., et al. Introducing MOTHUR: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7537-7541.
43. Shinkai T., et al. Fibrolytic capabilities of ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes in relation to its phylogenetic grouping. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 294:183-190.
44. Stewart C., et al. Selective isolation and characteristics of Bacteroides succinogenes from the rumen of a cow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 41:504-510.
45. Suen G., et al. The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18814.
46. Tajima K., et al. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 29:159-169.
47. Tamura K., Nei M., Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. PNAS. 2004, 101:11030-11035.
48. Tamura K., et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2731-2739.
49. van Houtert M.F.J. The production and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by ruminants fed roughages: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1993, 43:189-225.
50. Varel V., Fryda S., Robinson I. Cellulolytic bacteria from pig large intestine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47:219-221.
51. Walsh D.A., et al. Metagenome of a versatile chemolithoautotroph from expanding oceanic dead zones. Science 2009, 326:578-582.
52. Warnecke F., et al. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 2007, 450:560-565.
53. Weimer P.J., French A., Calamari T. Differential fermentation of cellulose allomorphs by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57:3101-3106.
54. Wen T.-N., et al. A truncated Fibrobacter succinogenes 1,3-1,4-β-d-glucanase with improved enzymatic activity and thermotolerance. Biochemistry 2005, 44:9197-9205.
55. ß. Anaerobe 1998, 4:153-163.
56. Zeikus J.G., Jain M.K., Elankovan P. Biotechnology of succinic acid production and markets for derived industrial products. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51:545-552.