Global energy and emissions scenarios for effective climate change mitigation-Deterministic and stochastic scenarios with the TIAM model

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 274-285

  Syri, Sanna ^a   Lehtilä, Antti ^a   Ekholm, Tommi ^a   Savolainen, Ilkka ^a   Holttinen, Hannele ^a   Peltola, Esa ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

2 target; Climate stabilisation; Multi gas scenario; Stochastic modelling

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; METHANE; NITROGEN OXIDES; STOCHASTIC MODELS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON-CAPTURE AND STORAGE; EMISSION REDUCTION; GLOBAL ENERGY SYSTEMS MODEL;

GAS EMISSIONS;

BIOENERGY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; METHANE; NITROUS OXIDE; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 40849117982     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. In: de la Chesnaye F., and Weyant J. (Eds). Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy. Energy J. (2006) (Special issue)
2. 2 Gas Mitigation Analysis in Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. DENA, 2005. Planning of the grid integration of wind energy in Germany onshore and offshore up to the year 2020 (dena Grid study). Deutsche Energie-Agentur Dena, March 2005. English summary and full German version available at http://www.dena.de/themen/thema-reg/projektarchiv/.
4. Estanqueiro A., Castro R., Ricardo J., Pinto M., Rodrigues R., and Peças Lopes J. How to prepare a power system for 12% wind energy penetration: the Portuguese case study. Nordic Wind Power Conference. Espoo, Finland, May 22-23 (2006)
5. EU Commission, 2007. Commission staff working document. Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius The way ahead for 2020 and beyond. Impact Assessment Summary. COM(2007) 2 final.
6. 2 capture, reuse and storage technologies for mitigating global climate change. Final Report DOE Order No. DE-AF22-96PC01257, Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
7. Holttinen H., Meibom P., Ensslin C., Hofmann L., Tuohy A., Tande J.O., Estanqueiro A., Gomez E., Söder L., Shakoor A., Smith J.C., Parsons B., and van Hulle F. State-of-the-art of design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power, summary of IEA wind collaboration. Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference EWEC'2007. European Wind Energy Association, Milan, Italy. May 7-10, 2007 (2007). www.ewea.org
8. Hoogwijk, M.M., 2004. On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, March 12, 2004, 256 pp.
9. IEA. Prospects for CO2 Capture and Storage (2004), IEA, Paris, France
10. IEA/NEA. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity-2005 Update (2005), IEA/NEA, Paris, France
11. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2006 (2006), IEA, Paris, France
12. IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2050 (2006), IEA, Paris, France
13. IPCC. In: Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., and Tanabe K. (Eds). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme (2006), IGES, Japan. 4-88788-032-4
14. IPCC. Summary for Policy Markers. Working Group I (2007), IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
15. IPCC, 2007b. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. IPCC, 2007c. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group I. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, chapter 10, p. 799.
17. Kauppi, P., Sedjo R., 2001. Technical and economic potential of options to enhance, maintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and geo-engineering. Chapter 4 in the IPCC Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
18. Keppo I., O'Neill B., and Riahi K. Probabilistic temperature change projections and energy system implications of greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 74 (2007) 936-961
19. Koster A., Matzner H.D., and Nicholsi D.R. PBMR design for the future. Nuclear Eng. Des. 222 (2003) 657-668
20. Loulou, R., Remme, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtilä, A., Goldstein, G., 2005. Documentation for the TIMES Model. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP), April 2005. http://www.etsap.org/documentation.asp.
21. Loulou, R., Labriet, M., in press. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model. Part I. Model structure. Comput. Manage. Sci. doi:10.1007/s10287-007-0046-z.
22. Manne, A., Richels, R., 2004. MERGE: a model for evaluating the regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. http://www.stanford.edu/group/MERGE/.
23. Meinshausen M., Hare B., Wigley T., van Vuuren D., den Elzen M., and Swart R. Multi-gas emissions pathways to meet climate targets. Climatic Change 75 (2006) 151-194
24. Monni S., Korhonen R., and Savolainen I. Radiative forcing due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from Finland: methods for estimating forcing of a country or an activity. Environ. Manage. 31 3 (2003) 401-411
25. NREL, AWEA, Black & Veatch, 2007. 20% wind vision technical assessment for the USA, with support from the U.S. DOE, pre-publication draft, November 2007.
26. NOAA ESRL, 2006. Radiative climate forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: The NOAA annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI). http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/aggi/.
27. Nordhaus W.D., and Boyer J. Roll the DICE Again: Economic Models of Global Warming (1999), Yale University manuscript edition
28. OECD, 2005. Uranium 2005: resources, production and demand. A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
29. Russ P., Wiesenthal T., van Regemorter D., Ciscar J., 2007. Global Climate Policy Scenarios for 2030 and beyond. Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Pathway scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Sevilla, Spain. ISBN: 978-92-79-07553-7.
30. Sathaye J., Makundi W., Dale L., Chan P., and Andrasko K. GHG Mitigation Potential, Costs and Benefits in Global Forests: A Dynamic Partial Equilibrium Approach (2005), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA CA LBNL-58291
31. Schneider S., and Mastrandrea M. Probabilistic assessment of dangerous climate change and emissions pathways. PNAS 102 (2005) 15728-15735
32. Soimakallio, S., Oinonen, T., 2002. Emission abatement of fluorinated greenhouse gases. Technology and climate change, CLIMTECH, 1999-2002. Final report. Technology Programme Report 14/2002. In: Soimakallio, S., Savolainen, I. (Eds.). TEKES, the National Technology Agency, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 125-133.
33. Stern N., 2006. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Report to the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the Economics of Climate Change, October 30, 2006, London, United Kingdom.
34. Wallace E., Matzie R., Heiderd R., and Maddalena J. From field to factory-taking advantage of shop manufacturing for the pebble bed modular reactor. Nuclear Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 445-453
35. UN, 2006. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects-The 2005 Revision, http://esa.un.org/unpp.
36. 2 greenhouse gases. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs (6207J), Washington, DC, USA, EPA Report 430-R-06-005, 438 p.
37. U.S. Department of Energy and Generation IV International Forum, 2002. A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems.
38. WEC, 2004. 2004 Survey of Energy Resources. World Energy Council, London.