Breaking with trends in pre-processing?

TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 96-106

  Engel, Jasper ^a   Gerretzen, Jan ^a,b   Szymańska, Ewa ^a,b   Jansen, Jeroen J ^a   Downey, Gerard ^c   Blanchet, Lionel ^a,d   Buydens, Lutgarde M C ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b TI COAST ^*  (Netherlands)

^c TEAGASC FOOD RESEARCH CENTRE   (Ireland)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemometrics; Data analysis; Data artifact; Model validation; Pre processing; Pre processing selection; Pre treatment; Pre treatment selection; Quality parameter; Visual inspection

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; SPECTROSCOPY;

CHEMOMETRICS; DATA ARTIFACTS; MODEL VALIDATION; PRE-PROCESSING; PRE-TREATMENT; QUALITY PARAMETERS; VISUAL INSPECTION;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTIFACT; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGHT SCATTERING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84881647375     PISSN: 01659936     EISSN: 18793142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2013.04.015     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Eriksson L., et al. Using chemometrics for navigating in the large data sets of genomics, proteomics, and metabonomics (gpm). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 380:419-429.
2. Wold S., Berglund A., Kettaneh N. New and old trends in chemometrics. How to deal with the increasing data volumes in R&D&P (research, development and production) - with examples from pharmaceutical research and process modeling. J. Chemom. 2002, 16:377-386.
3. van den Berg R.A., et al. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006, 7.
4. Rinnan A., van den Berg F., Engelsen S.B. Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28:1201-1222.
5. Parastar H., Jalali-Heravi M., Tauler R. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) retention time shift correction and modeling using bilinear peak alignment, correlation optimized shifting and multivariate curve resolution. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 117:80-91.
6. Forshed J., Schuppe-Koistinen I., Jacobsson S.P. Peak alignment of NMR signals by means of a genetic algorithm. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 487:189-199.
7. Ding T., et al. Far-infrared spectroscopy analysis of linear and cyclic peptides, and lysozyme. Vib. Spectrosc. 2012, 61:144-150.
8. Szymanska E., et al. Evaluation of different warping methods for the analysis of CE profiles of urinary nucleosides. Electrophoresis 2007, 28:2861-2873.
9. Brown M., et al. A metabolome pipeline: from concept to data to knowledge. Metabolomics 2005, 1:39-51.
10. Barnes R.J., Dhanoa M.S., Lister S.J. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989, 43:772-777.
11. Wold S., et al. Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44:175-185.
12. Skov T., et al. Automated alignment of chromatographic data. J. Chemom. 2006, 20:484-497.
13. MacKinnon N., et al. Variable reference alignment: an improved peak alignment protocol for NMR spectral data with large intersample variation. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84:5372-5379.
14. Cen H.Y., He Y. Theory and application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in determination of food quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18:72-83.
15. Zeaiter M., Roger J.M., Bellon-Maurel V. Robustness of models developed by multivariate calibration. Part II: the influence of pre-processing methods. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2005, 24:437-445.
16. Daszykowski M., et al. Start-to-end processing of two-dimensional gel electrophoretic images. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1158:306-317.
17. Smolinska A., et al. NMR and pattern recognition methods in metabolomics: from data acquisition to biomarker discovery: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 750:82-97.
18. Castillo S., et al. Algorithms and tools for the preprocessing of LC-MS metabolomics data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2011, 108:23-32.
19. Brereton R.G. Introduction to multivariate calibration in analytical chemistry. Analyst 2000, 125:2125-2154.
20. Savitzky A., Golay M.J.E. Smoothing + differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36:1627.
21. Barclay V.J., Bonner R.F., Hamilton I.P. Application of wavelet transforms to experimental spectra: smoothing, denoising, and data set compression. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:78-90.
22. Eilers P.H.C. Parametric time warping. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:404-411.
23. Guo Q., Wu W., Massart D.L. The robust normal variate transform for pattern recognition with near-infrared data. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 382:87-103.
24. Geladi P., Macdougall D., Martens H. Linearization and scatter-correction for near-infrared reflectance spectra of meat. Appl. Spectrosc. 1985, 39:491-500.
25. Fearn T., et al. On the geometry of SNV and MSC. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009, 96:22-26.
26. Torgrip R.O., Alm E., Åberg K.M. Warping and alignment technologies for inter-sample feature correspondence in 1D H-NMR, chromatography-, and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry data. Bioanal. Rev. 2010, 1:105-116.
27. Bloemberg T.G., et al. Warping methods for spectroscopic and chromatographic signal alignment: A tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 781:14-32.
28. Savorani F., Tomasi G., Engelsen S.B. Icoshift: a versatile tool for the rapid alignment of 1D NMR spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 202:190-202.
29. Tomasi G., Savorani F., Engelsen S.B. Icoshift: an effective tool for the alignment of chromatographic data. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:7832-7840.
30. De Meyer T., et al. NMR-based characterization of metabolic alterations in hypertension using an adaptive, intelligent binning algorithm. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:3783-3790.
31. Amigo J.M., Skov T., Bro R. ChroMATHography: solving chromatographic issues with mathematical models and intuitive graphics. Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, US) 2010, 110:4582-4605.
32. Torgrip R.J.O., et al. A note on normalization of biofluid 1D H-1-NMR data. Metabolomics 2008, 4:114-121.
33. Aruga R. Closure of analytical chemical data and multivariate classification. Talanta 1998, 47:1053-1061.
34. Kultima K., et al. Development and evaluation of normalization methods for label-free relative quantification of endogenous peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8:2285-2295.
35. Westerhuis J.A., de Jong S., Smilde A.K. Direct orthogonal signal correction. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 56:13-25.
36. Bro R., Smilde A.K. Centering and scaling in component analysis. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:16-33.
37. Christin C., et al. Optimized time alignment algorithm for LC-MS data: correlation optimized warping using component detection algorithm-selected mass chromatograms. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:7012-7021.
38. Bloemberg T.G., et al. Improved parametric time warping for proteomics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 104:65-74.
39. Hendriks M.M.W.B., et al. Data-processing strategies for metabolomics studies. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30:1685-1698.
40. Famili F., et al. Data pre-processing and intelligent data analysis. Int. J. Int. Data Anal. 1997, 1.
41. Engel J., et al. Confirmation of brand identity of a Trappist beer by mid-infrared spectroscopy coupled with multivariate data analysis. Talanta 2012, 99:426-432.
42. Barker M., Rayens W. Partial least squares for discrimination. J. Chemom. 2003, 17:166-173.
43. Denoord O.E. The influence of data preprocessing on the robustness and parsimony of multivariate calibration models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 23:65-70.
44. Renard B.Y., et al. When less can yield more - Computational preprocessing of MS/MS spectra for peptide identification. Proteomics 2009, 9:4978-4984.
45. Luypaert J., Zhang M.H., Massart D.L. Feasibility study for the use of near infrared spectroscopy in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of green tea, Camellia sinensis (L.). Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 478:303-312.
46. Luypaert J., et al. An evaluation of direct orthogonal signal correction and other preprocessing methods for the classification of clinical study lots of a dermatological cream. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002, 30:453-466.
47. Candolfi A., et al. The influence of data pre-processing in the pattern recognition of excipients near-infrared spectra. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999, 21:115-132.
48. Jarvis R.M., Goodacre R. Genetic algorithm optimization for pre-processing and variable selection of spectroscopic data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:860-868.
49. Bocklitz T., et al. How to pre-process Raman spectra for reliable and stable models?. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 704:47-56.
50. Laxalde J., et al. Characterisation of heavy oils using near-infrared spectroscopy: optimisation of pre-processing methods and variable selection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 705:227-234.
51. Giskeodegard G.F., et al. Alignment of high resolution magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectra using warping methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 683:1-11.
52. Luypaert J., et al. The effect of preprocessing methods in reducing interfering variability from near-infrared measurements of creams. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 36:495-503.
53. Andersson F.O., Kaiser R., Jacobsson S.P. Data preprocessing by wavelets and genetic algorithms for enhanced multivariate analysis of LC peptide mapping. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 34:531-541.
54. Sanchez F.C., Lewi P.J., Massart D.L. Effect of different preprocessing methods for principal component analysis applied to the composition of mixtures - detection of impurities in Hplc-Dad. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 25:157-177.
55. Hendriks M.M.W.B., et al. Preprocessing and exploratory analysis of chromatographic profiles of plant extracts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 545:53-64.
56. Gabrielsson J., et al. OPLS methodology for analysis of pre-processing effects on spectroscopic data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 84:153-158.
57. Wu W., et al. Peak alignment of urine NMR spectra using fuzzy warping. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46:863-875.
58. Esquerre C., et al. Suppressing sample morphology effects in near infrared spectral imaging using chemometric data pre-treatments. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 117:129-137.
59. Albert A., Zhang L.X. A novel definition of the multivariate coefficient of variation. Biom. J. 2010, 52:667-675.