Sex differences in neural efficiency: Are they due to the stereotype threat effect?

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 744-749

  Dunst, Beate ^a   Benedek, Mathias ^a   Bergner, Sabine ^a   Athenstaedt, Ursula ^a   Neubauer, Aljoscha C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

EEG; Mental rotation; Neural efficiency; Sex difference; Stereotype threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881616238     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alter A.L., Aronson J., Darley J.M., Rodriguez C., Ruble D.N. Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:166-171.
2. Croizet J.C., Després G., Gauzins M.E., Huguet P., Leyens J.P., Méot A. Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:721-731.
3. Cronbach L.J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 1957, 12:671-684.
4. Davies P.G., Spencer S.J., Steele C.M. Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88(2):276-287.
5. Deary I.J., Penke L., Johnson W. The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11:201-211.
6. Eysenck M.W., Derakshan N., Santos R., Calvo M.G. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion 2007, 7:336-353.
7. Good C., Aronson J., Harder J.A. Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008, 29:17-28.
8. Grabner R.H., Fink A., Stipacek A., Neuper C., Neubauer A.C. Intelligence and working memory systems: Evidence of neural efficiency in alpha band ERD. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 20:212-225.
9. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55:468-484.
10. Haier R.J., Jung R.E., Yeo R.A., Head K., Alkire M.T. The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. Neuroimage 2005, 25:320-327.
11. Haier R.J., Siegel B.V., MacLachlan A., Soderling E., Lottenberg S., Buchsbaum M.S. Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: A positron emission tomographic study. Brain Research 1992, 570:134-143.
12. Halpern D.F. A cognitive taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004, 13:135-139.
13. Halpern D.F., Benbow C.P., Geary D.C., Gur R.C., Hyde J.S., Gernsbacher M.A. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science 2007, 8:1-51.
14. Jamieson J.P., Harkins S.G. Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:544-564.
15. Jaušovec N., Jaušovec K. Spatial rotation and recognizing emotions: Gender related differences in brain activity. Intelligence 2008, 36:383-393.
16. Jung R.E., Haier R.J. The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Science 2007, 30:135-187.
17. Keller J. When negative stereotypic expectancies turn into challenge or threat: The moderating role of regulatory focus. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2007, 66:163-168.
18. Kober S.E., Neuper C. Sex differences in human EEG theta oscillations during spatial navigation in virtual reality. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2011, 79:347-355.
19. Krendl A.C., Richeson J.A., Kelley W.M., Heatherton T.F. The negative consequences of threat - A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women's underperformance in math. Psychological Science 2008, 19:168-175.
20. Lipp I., Benedek M., Fink A., Koschutnig K., Reishofer G., Bergner S., et al. Investigating neural efficiency in the visuo-spatial domain: An fMRI study. PLoS One 2012, 7(12):e51316.
21. Lubinski D. Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences 2010, 49:344-351.
22. Moè A., Pazzaglia F. Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences 2006, 16:369-377.
23. Neubauer A.C., Bergner S., Schatz M. Two- vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: Sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation. Intelligence 2010, 38:529-539.
24. Neubauer A.C., Fink A. Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33:1004-1023.
25. Neubauer A.C., Fink A., Schrausser D.G. Intelligence and neural efficiency: The influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship. Intelligence 2002, 30:515-536.
26. Neubauer A.C., Grabner R.H., Fink A., Neuper C. Intelligence and neural efficiency: Further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:217-225.
27. Nopoulos P., Flaum M., O'Leary D., Andreasen N.C. Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: Evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Research 2000, 98:1-13.
28. O'Brien L.T., Crandall C.S. Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29:782-789.
29. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronisation and desynchronisation: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110:1842-1857.
30. Schmader T., Johns M. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:440-452.
31. Schmader T., Johns M., Forbes C.E. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review 2008, 115:336-356.
32. Spencer S., Steele C., Quinn D. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1999, 35:4-28.
33. Steele C.M. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 1997, 52:613-629.
34. Steele C.M. Whistling Vivaldi and other clues to how stereotypes affect us 2010, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
35. Stone J. Battling Doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:1667-1678.
36. Wicherts J.M., Dolan C.V., Hessen D.J. Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:696-716.
37. Wraga M., Helt M., Jacobs E., Sullivan K. Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women's mental rotation performance. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 2007, 2:12-19.