Statistics for the dynamic analysis of scientometric data: The evolution of the sciences in terms of trajectories and regimes

Scientometrics

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 731-741

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dynamic; Entropy; Evolution; Regimes; Trajectories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881615987     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0917-0     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abdulnasser, H.-J. (2004). Multivariate tests for autocorrelation in the stable and unstable VAR models. Economic Modelling, 21(4), 661-683.
2. Agarwal, P., & Searls, D. B. (2008). Literature mining in support of drug discovery. Briefings in bioinformatics, 9(6), 479-492.
3. Agarwal, P., & Searls, D. B. (2009). Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 8(11), 865-878.
4. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116-131.
5. Bak, P., & Chen, K. (1991). Self-organized criticality. Scientific American, 264(1), 46-53.
6. Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1987). Self-organized criticality: an explanation of the 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters, 59(4), 381-384.
7. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
8. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1955). An examination of information theory. Philosophy of Science, 22, 86-105.
9. Baur, M., Benkert, M., Brandes, U., Cornelsen, S., Gaertler, M., Köpf, B., et al. (2002). Visone software for visual social network analysis. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium graph srawing (GD'01). Lecture Notes of Computer Science, 2265, 554-557.
10. Baur, M. & Schank, T. (2008). Dynamic graph drawing in visone. Technical University Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe. Available at http://i11www. iti. uni-karlsruhe. de/extra/publications/bs-dgdv-08. pdf (retrieved on 2 May 2012).
11. Börner, K. (2010). Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2011). Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: the avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 228-230.
13. Brandes, U. & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone-analysis and visualization of social networks. In: M. Jünger & P. Mtuzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 321-340), Berlin: Springer.
14. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
15. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.
16. Chen, C. (2004). Information visualization: beyond the horizon. New York: Springer.
17. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
18. Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentations: design and analysis issues for field-settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
19. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
20. Dolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 932-941.
21. Erten, C., Harding, Ph. J., Kobourov, S. G., Wampler, K., & Yee, G. V. (2004). GraphAEL: graph animations with evolving layouts (pp. 98-110). In: Liotta, G. (Ed.), Graph drawing, Perugia, Italy, 21-24 Sept 2003; Berlin: Springer.
22. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Gansner, E. R., Koren, Y., & North, S. (2005). Graph drawing by stress majorization. In J. Pach (Ed.), Graph drawing, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3383, pp. 239-250). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
24. Griliches, Z. (1994). Productivity, R&D and the data constraint. American Economic Review, 84(1), 1-23.
25. Helbing, D., & Balietti, S. (2011). How to create an innovation accelerator. The European Physical Journal-Special Topics, 195(1), 101-136.
26. Hodgson, G., & Knudsen, T. (2011). Darwin's conjecture: the search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.
28. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1-18.
30. Krippendorff, K. (1986). Information theory. Structural models for qualitative data. Beverly Hills: Sage).
31. Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information of interactions in complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669-680.
32. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1-27.
33. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
34. Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On Information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79-86.
35. Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: the failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693. doi: 10. 1080/00343401003614274.
36. Leydesdorff, L. (1991). The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory. Social Networks, 13, 301-345.
37. Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The challenge of scientometrics: the development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University; at http://www. universal-publishers. com/book. php?method=ISBN&book=1581126816.
38. Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 418-427.
39. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). Is the European Union becoming a single publication system? Scientometrics, 47(2), 265-280.
40. Leydesdorff, L. (2002). The complex dynamics of technological innovation: a comparison of models using cellular automata. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 19(6), 563-575.
41. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: an indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467.
42. Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: giddens' "structuration theory" and Luhmann's "self-organization". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2138-2150.
43. Leydesdorff, L. (2011). "Structuration" by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among scientific texts. Scientometrics, 88(2), 499-520.
44. Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Opthof, T. (2011). Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: principles for comparing sets of documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1370-1381.
45. Leydesdorff, L., Cozzens, S. E., & van den Besselaar, P. (1994). Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings. Research Policy, 23, 217-229.
46. Leydesdorff, L., & Oomes, N. A. (1999). Is the European monetary system converging to integration? Social Science Information, 38(1), 57-86.
47. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays: a new method for generating global journal maps from web-of-science data. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 318-332.
48. Leydesdorff, L., Rotolo, D., & de Nooy, W. (in press). Innovation as a nonlinear process, the scientometric perspective, and the specification of an "innovation opportunities explorer", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.
49. Leydesdorff, L., Rotolo, D., & Rafols, I. (2012b). Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject headings (MeSH) of PubMed. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2239-2253.
50. Leydesdorff, L., & Schank, T. (2008). Dynamic animations of journal maps: indicators of structural change and interdisciplinary developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1810-1818.
51. Leydesdorff, L., Schank, T., Scharnhorst, A., & De Nooy, W. (2008). Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling. El Profesional de la Información, 17(6), 611-626.
52. Leydesdorff, L., & Zawdie, G. (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 789-804.
53. Liu, Z., & Stasko, J. T. (2010). Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: a top-down perspective. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6), 999-1008.
54. Luhmann, N. (1990). The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown. In: W. Krohn, G. Küppers & H. Nowotny (Eds.), Selforganization. Portrait of a scientific revolution (pp. 64-85). Dordrecht: Reidel.
55. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
56. Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (1999). 'History-firendly' models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3-35.
57. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extension of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Misue, K., Eades, P., Lai, W., & Sugiyama, K. (1995). Layout adjustment and the mental map. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 6(2), 183-210.
59. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
60. Noyons, E. C. M., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 68-81.
61. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: the role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
62. Price, D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306.
63. Price, D. de Solla. (1984). The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. Research Policy, 13, 3-20.
64. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos: man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.
65. Pyka, A., & Scharnhorst, A. (Eds.). (2009). Innovation networks: new approaches in modelling and analyzing. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
66. Scharnhorst, A., Börner, K., & van den Besselaar, P. (Eds.). (2012). Models of science dynamics: encounters between complexity theory and information sciences. Heidelberg: Springer.
67. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
68. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 and 623-356.
69. Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
70. Shinn, T. (2005). New sources of radical innovation: research-technologies, transversality and distributed learning in a post-industrial order. Social Science Information, 44(4), 731-764.
71. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44-60.
72. Strand, O., & Leydesdorff, L. (in press). Where is synergy in the Norwegian innovation system indicated? Triple helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
73. Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland.
74. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: vOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
75. Von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5(3), 212-239.
76. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Yeung, R. W. (2008). Information theory and network coding. New York: Springer.