Do second-order similarities provide added-value in a hybrid approach?

Scientometrics

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 667-677

  Thijs, Bart ^a   Schiebel, Edgar ^b   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c LHAS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Bibliographic coupling; Hybrid clustering; Public health; Similarity measures; Text mining

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881615233     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0896-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009). Document-document similarity approaches and science mapping: experimental comparison of five approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 49-63. doi: 10. 1016/j. joi. 2008. 11. 003.
2. Bichteler, J., & Eaton, E. A. (1980). The combined use of bibliographic coupling and co-citation for document retrieval. JASIS, 31(4), 278-282. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 4630310408.
3. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? JASIST, 61(12), 2389-2404. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 21419.
4. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, part 1: structural aspects. JASIS, 42(4), 233-251. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42: 4<233:: AID-ASI1>3. 0. CO;2-I.
5. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis part II: dynamical aspects. JASIS, 42(4), 252-266. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42: 4<252:: AID-ASI2>3. 0. CO;2-G.
6. Colliander, C., & Ahlgren, P. (2011). Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context. Scientometrics, 90(2), 675-685. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0491-x.
7. Glänzel, W. (2012). The role of core documents in bibliometric network analysis and their relation with h-type indices. Scientometrics, 93(1), 113-123. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-012-0639-3.
8. Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & Thijs, B. (2009). A comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 79(1), 109-129. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0407-1.
9. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using 'core documents' for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297-309. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0347-4.
10. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using 'core documents' for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399-416. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0591-7.
11. Janssens, F. (2007). Clustering of scientific fields by integrating text mining and bibliometrics. Ph. D. Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. http://www. hdl. handle. net/1979/847.
12. Kopcsa, A., & Schiebel, E. (1998). Science and technology mapping: a new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships. JASIS, 49(1), 7-17. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49: 1<7:: AID-ASI3>3. 0. CO;2-W.
13. Picard, J. (1999), Finding content-bearing terms using term similarities. In Proceedings of EACL'99, 241-244.
14. Rousseeuw, P. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20(1), 53-65. doi: 10. 1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
15. Schiebel, E. (2012). Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations. Scientometrics, 91(2), 557-566. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-012-0626-8.
16. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 30(1), 333-351. doi: 10. 1007/BF02017232.