Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations

Scientometrics

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 557-566

  Schiebel, Edgar ^a  

^a AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

3D visualisation; Battery research; Bibliographic coupling; Co citation analysis; Emerging research fronts; Jaccard index; Knowledge bases; Local paper density; Research fronts; Science mapping; Similarity; Spatial density

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859428704     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0626-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? JASIST, 61(12), 2389-2404.
2. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. JASIST, 57(3), 359-377.
3. Chen, C., & Morris, S. (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. In Proceedings of IEEE symposium on information visualization (pp 67-74), Seattle, WA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
4. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
5. Liu, Y., Matsumura, T., Imanishi, N., Hirano, A., Ichikawa, T., & Takeda, Y. (2005). Preparation and characterization of Si/C composite coated with polyaniline as novel anodes for Li-ion batteries. Electrochemical and Solid State Letters, 8(11), A599-A602.
6. Marshakova I. V. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaja Informacya, ser. 2, N6, 3-8 (in Russian).
7. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASSIS 1986-1990. JASSIS, 45(1), 31-38.
8. Price, D. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
9. Schiebel, E. (2011). Research fronts and areal density of bibliographically coupled publications In: E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, J. Leta (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2011-the 13th international conference on scientometrics and informatics, Durban, South Africa, 4-7 July 2011, [756-762].
10. Shibata, N., et al. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. JASIST, 60(3), 571-580.
11. Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.