Heterophoria adaptation during the viewing of 3D stereoscopic stimuli

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 604-610

  Karpicka, Edyta ^a   Howarth, Peter Alan ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D; Binocular vision; Heterophoria; Phoria adaptation; Visual discomfort

Indexed keywords

3D; ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HETEROPHORIA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHORIA ADAPTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECREATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCOMFORT; YOUNG ADULT;

3D; BINOCULAR VISION; HETEROPHORIA; PHORIA ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCOMFORT;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881615151     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12081     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dodgson NA. Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance. Proc SPIE 2004; 5291: 36-46.
2. Maddox EE. The Clinical Use of Prisms and the Decentering of Lenses, 2nd edn. John Wright & Sons: Bristol, England, 1893.
3. Fincham EF & Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. J Physiol 1957; 137: 488-508.
4. Mitchell AM & Ellebrock VJ. Fixational disparity and the maintenance of fusion in the horizontal meridian. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1955; 32: 520-534.
5. Schor CM. The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vision Res 1979; 19: 757-765.
6. North RV, Sethi B & Owen K. Prism adaptation and viewing distance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990; 10: 81-85.
7. North RV & Henson DB. The effect of orthoptic treatment upon the vergence adaptation mechanism. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 294-299.
8. Patel N & Firth AY. Vertical vergence adaptation does improve with practice. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 316-319.
9. Brautaset RL & Jennings AJM. Effects of orthoptic treatment on the CA/C and AC/A ratios in convergence insufficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2876-2880.
10. Brautaset RL & Jennings JAM. Horizontal and vertical prism adaptation are different mechanisms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 215-218.
11. North R & Henson DB. Adaptation to lens-induced heterophorias. Am J Optom and Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 774-780.
12. Jiang B-C, Tea YC & O'Donnell D. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses. Optometry 2007; 78: 129-134.
13. Sreenivasan V, Bobier WR, Irving EL & Lakshminarayanan V. Effect of vergence adaptation on convergence-accommodation: model simulations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009; 56: 2389-2395.
14. Ehrlich DL. Near vision stress:vergence adaptation and accommodative fatigue. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 353-357.
15. Inoue T & Ohzu H. Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display. Appl Opt 1997; 36: 4509-4515.
16. Ukai K & Kato Y. The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3-D display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 385-388.
17. Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS, et al. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus-and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Res 2006; 46: 475-484.
18. Torii M, Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS & Gilmartin B. Dynamic measurement of accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. J Mod Opt 2008; 55: 557-567.
19. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K & Banks MS. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis 2008; 8: 33.1-30.
20. Shibata T, Kim J, Hoffman DM & Banks MS. The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. J Vis 2011; 11: 11.
21. Fukushima T, Torii M, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS & Gilmartin B. The relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. J Vis 2009; 9: 1-13.
22. Lambooij M, Fortuin M, IJsselsteijn W et al. Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Tech 2010; 20: 1913-23.
23. Howarth PA. Potential hazards of viewing 3-D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 111-122.
24. Yang SN & Sheedy JE. Effects of vergence and accommodative responses on viewer's comfort in viewing 3D stimuli. Proc SPIE 2011; 7863: 78630Q-1-78630Q-13.
25. Howarth PA. Empirical Studies of Accommodation, Convergence, and HMD Use. In: Hoso-Bunka Foundation Symposium, 3 December 1996. Hoso - Bunka Foundation: Tokyo 1996.
26. Winn B, Gilmartin B, Sculfor DL, Sculfor DL & Bamford JC. Vergence adaptation and senescence. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 797-800.
27. Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA & Grosvenor TP. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 719-726.
28. Escalante JB & Rosenfield M. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Optometry 2006; 779: 229-234.
29. Howarth PA & Istance HO. The association between visual discomfort and the use of visual-display units. Behav Inform Technol 1985; 4: 131-149.