EEG signatures associated with stopping are sensitive to preparation

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 900-908

  Greenhouse, Ian ^a,b   Wessel, Jan R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Cognitive control; Coherence; EEG ERP; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; COGNITION; COHERENCE; EEG/ERP; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RESPONSE INHIBITION; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

COGNITION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; COHERENCE; EEG/ERP; RESPONSE INHIBITION;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881614358     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12070     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aron, A. R., Durston, S., Eagle, D. M., Logan, G. D., Stinear, C. M., & Stuphorn, V. (2007). Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 11860-11864. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-07.2007
2. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129-1159.
3. Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491-507.
4. Boehler, C. N., Hopf, J.-M., Stoppel, C. M., & Krebs, R. M. (2012). Motivating inhibition-reward prospect speeds up response cancellation. Cognition., 125, 498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.018
5. Bollinger, J., Rubens, M. T., Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2010). Expectation-driven changes in cortical functional connectivity influence working memory and long-term memory performance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14399-14410. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1547-10.2010
6. Capotosto, P., Babiloni, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2009). Frontoparietal cortex controls spatial attention through modulation of anticipatory alpha rhythms. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5863-5872. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0539-09.2009
7. Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Hirose, S., Yamashita, K.-I., Miyashita, Y., & Konishi, S. (2009). Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 15870-15877. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3645-09.2009
8. Danielmeier, C., Eichele, T., Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1780-1789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4299-10.2011
9. de Jong, R., Coles, M. G., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
10. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 134, 9-21.
11. Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007). Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. NeuroImage, 34, 1443-1449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004
12. Dimoska, A., & Johnstone, S. J. (2008). Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: Do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects? Biological Psychology, 77, 324-336. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.005
13. Dimoska, A., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2006). The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? Brain and Cognition, 62, 98-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.011
14. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51, 877-887. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043
15. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011
16. Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2012). Effects of task complexity on ERP components in go/nogo tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 273-278. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.007
17. Greenhouse, I., Oldenkamp, C. L., & Aron, A. R. (2012). Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 384-392. doi: 10.1152/jn.00704.2011
18. Huster, R. J., Eichele, T., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Wollbrink, A., Kugel, H., Konrad, C., & Pantev, C. (2011). Multimodal imaging of functional networks and event-related potentials in performance monitoring. NeuroImage, 56, 1588-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.039
19. Huster, R. J., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Lavallee, C. F., Falkenstein, M., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012). Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 217-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001
20. Huster, R. J., Westerhausen, R., Pantev, C., & Konrad, C. (2010). The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1260-1271. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20933
21. Jahfari, S., Stinear, C. M., Claffey, M., Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Responding with restraint: What are the neurocognitive mechanisms? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1479-1492. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21307
22. Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1745-1758.
23. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006a). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 348-368. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034
24. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006b). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.033
25. King, J. A., Korb, F. M., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2010). Post-error behavioral adjustments are facilitated by activation and suppression of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12759-12769. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3274-10.2010
26. Kok, A., Ramautar, J. R., De Ruiter, M. B., Band, G. P. H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology, 41, 9-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x
27. Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 194-208.
28. Leotti, L. A., & Wager, T. D. (2010). Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 430-447. doi: 10.1037/a0016802
29. Liotti, M., Pliszka, S. R., Higgins, K., Perez, R., & Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2010). Evidence for specificity of ERP abnormalities during response inhibition in ADHD children: A comparison with reading disorder children without ADHD. Brain and Cognition, 72, 228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.007
30. Luck, S., Woodman, G., & Vogel, E. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 432-440.
31. Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788-798.
32. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
33. Polich, J., & Kok, A. (1995). Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: An integrative review. Biological Psychology, 41, 103-146.
34. Ramautar, J. R., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain and Cognition, 56, 234-252. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.002
35. Ramautar, J. R., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 72, 96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.001
36. Schmajuk, M., Liotti, M., Busse, L., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia, 44, 384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.005
37. Simons, R. F. (2010). The way of our errors: Theme and variations. Psychophysiology, 47, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00929.x
38. Sinopoli, K. J., Schachar, R., & Dennis, M. (2011). Reward improves cancellation and restraint inhibition across childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1479-1489. doi: 10.1037/a0024440
39. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
40. Swann, N. C., Cai, W., Conner, C. R., Pieters, T. A., Claffey, M. P., George, J. S., ... Tandon, N. (2012). Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: Electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity. NeuroImage, 59, 2860-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.049
41. van Boxtel, G. J., Molen, M. W. V. D., Jennings, J. R., & Brunia, C. H. (2001). A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 58, 229-262.
42. van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A. F., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Dissociable brain mechanisms underlying the conscious and unconscious control of behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 91-105. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21431
43. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009a). Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 835-854. doi: 10.1037/a0012726
44. Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2012). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science. Retrieved from http://ccal-exeter.org/Resources/verbruggen_ssrt_psychscience.pdf
45. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009b). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 647-661. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014
46. Vink, M., Kahn, R. S., Raemaekers, M., van den Heuvel, M., Boersma, M., & Ramsey, N. F. (2005). Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 336-344. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20111
47. Vink, M., Ramsey, N. F., Raemaekers, M., & Kahn, R. S. (2006). Striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia and unaffected relatives. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.026
48. Wessel, J. R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, J. B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7528-7537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6352-11.2012
49. Zandbelt, B. B., & Vink, M. (2010). On the role of the striatum in response inhibition. PloS One, 5, e13848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013848
50. Zandbelt, B. B., Bloemendaal, M., Neggers, S. F. W., Kahn, R. S., & Vink, M. (2012). Expectations and violations: Delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control. Human Brain Mapping. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22047
51. Zanto, T. P., Rubens, M. T., Bollinger, J., & Gazzaley, A. (2010). Top-down modulation of visual feature processing: The role of the inferior frontal junction. NeuroImage, 53, 736-745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.012
52. Zanto, T. P., Rubens, M. T., Thangavel, A., & Gazzaley, A. (2011). Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 656-661. doi: 10.1038/nn.2773