Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 235-240

  Gelalis, Ioannis D ^a   Arnaoutoglou, Christina ^a   Christoforou, Giorgos ^a   Lykissas, Marios G ^a   Batsilas, Ioannis ^a   Xenakis, Theodoros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Decompression; Laminectomy; Lumbar vertebrae; Spinal stenosis surgery; Surgical; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649703969     PISSN: 1017995X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2278     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, Crock HV, Dommisse GF, Edgar MA, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;(115):4-5.
2. Johnsson KE, Rosén I, Udén A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;(279):82-6.
3. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleâs F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000;25:1424-35.
4. Johnsson KE, Udén A, Rosén I. The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine 1991;16:615-9.
5. Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77:1036-41.
6. Gelalis ID, Stafilas KS, Korompilias AV, Zacharis KC, Beris AE, Xenakis TA. Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results. Int Orthop 2006;30:59-63.
7. Niggemeyer O, Strauss JM, Schulitz KP. Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995. Eur Spine J 1997;6:423-9.
8. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2003;34:281-95.
9. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1992;17:1-8.
10. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997;22:2807-12.
11. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Brick GW, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 1997;22:1123-31.
12. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996;21:92-8.
13. Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Neurosurgery 2006;59:1264-9.
14. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, Baldus CR, Lenke LG. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 1999;24:1721-7.
15. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Abraham DA, Berkower DL, Ditkoff JS. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004;29:726-33.
16. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine 1994;19(20 Suppl):2256S-2265S.
17. Cornefjord M, Byröd G, Brisby H, Rydevik B. A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2000;9:563-70.
18. Feffer HL, Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM, Rothman RH. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. To fuse or not to fuse. Spine 1985;10:287-9.
19. Hansraj KK, Cammisa FP Jr, O'Leary PF, Crockett HC, Fras CI, Cohen MS, et al. Decompressive surgery for typical lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(384):10-7.
20. Hansraj KK, O'Leary PF, Cammisa FP Jr, Hall JC, Fras CI, Cohen MS, et al. Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(384):18-25.
21. Jönsson B. Patient-related factors predicting the outcome of decompressive surgery. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993;251:69-70.