Functional cortical reorganization after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis: Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging in poststroke patients

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 422-429

  Yamada, Naoki ^a,b   Kakuda, Wataru ^a,b   Senoo, Atsushi ^c   Kondo, Takahiro ^a   Mitani, Sugao ^a   Shimizu, Masato ^a   Abo, Masahiro ^a,b,c  

^a Shimizu Hospital   (Japan)

^b JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Functional MRI; Occupational therapy; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; FUNCTION TEST; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMIPARESIS; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE STIMULATOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST;

FUNCTIONAL MRI; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84881543301     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12056     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005; 36:1480-1484.
2. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002; 33:1840-1844.
3. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wasserman EM, Hallet M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994; 117:847-858.
4. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C etal. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997; 48:1398-1403.
5. Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:800-805.
6. Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 2000; 133:425-430.
7. Wu T, Sommer M, Tergau F, Paulus W. Lasting influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 2000; 287:37-40.
8. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS etal. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005; 64:1802-1804.
9. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36:2681-2686.
10. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC etal. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke 2006; 37:2115-2122.
11. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kaito N, Ishikawa A, Taguchi K, Yokoi A. Six-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus occupational therapy for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: a case series study. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32:801-807.
12. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K etal. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive occupational therapy for poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: preliminary study of a 15-day protocol. Int J Rehabil Res 2010; 33:339-345.
13. Mally J, Dinya E. Recovery of motor disability and spasticity in post-stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Brain Res Bull 2008; 76:388-395.
14. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K etal. Anti-spastic effect of low-frequency rTMS applied with occupational therapy in post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Brain Inj 2011; 25:496-502.
15. Kondo T, Kakuda W, Yamada N, Shimizu M, Hagino H, Abo M. Effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor neuron excitability after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2013; 127:26-30.
16. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003; 34:1553-1566.
17. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A etal. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33:1610-1617.
18. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003; 19:1233-1239.
19. Bennett CM, Wolford GL, Miller MB. The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2009; 4:417-422.
20. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW III, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82:750-755.
21. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16:232-240.
22. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19:404-411.
23. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM etal. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19:194-205.
24. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP etal. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296:2095-2104.
25. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:708-712.
26. Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F etal. The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. Brain 1997; 120:605-619.
27. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30:2369-2375.
28. Lieport J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31:1210-1216.
29. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80:4-12.
30. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RSJ. The influence of time after stroke on brain activations during a motor task. Ann Neurol 2004; 55:829-834.
31. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T etal. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain 2002; 125:1896-1907.
32. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004; 55:400-409.
33. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000; 31:656-661.
34. Calautti C, Naccarato M, Jones PS etal. The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: a 3T fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007; 34:322-331.
35. Dong Y, Dobkin BH, Cen SY, Wu AD, Winstein CJ. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37:1552-1555.
36. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport 1999; 10:807-810.
37. Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS etal. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16:326-338.
38. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM etal. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002; 125:773-788.
39. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008; 131:425-437.
40. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H etal. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005; 25:1325-1335.