Measuring Visual Field Progression in the Central 10 Degrees Using Additional Information from Central 24 Degrees Visual Fields and 'Lasso Regression'

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Asaoka, Ryo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL 10 DEGREES VISUAL FIELD; CENTRAL 24 DEGREES VISUAL FIELD; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; LASSO REGRESSION; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; RETINA FOVEA; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL FIELD PROGRESSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881504056     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072199     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Quigley HA, (1996) Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80: 389-393.
2. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, et al. (2004) Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122: 477-485.
3. Aulhorn E., Harms H. (1967) Early visual field defects in glaucoma. In: Leydheeker W., editor. Glaucoma Symposion Tutziug Castle 1966. New York Karger Basel 151-186.
4. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. (1977) Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. In: EL. G, editor. Second International Visual Field Symposium Tubingen 1976. Den Haag: Junk. 75-83.
5. Sumi I, Shirato S, Matsumoto S, Araie M, (2003) The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 110: 332-339.
6. Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE, Cruickshanks KJ, (1998) Performance-based and self-assessed measures of visual function as related to history of falls, hip fractures, and measured gait time. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 105: 160-164.
7. Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H, Baudoin C, Schott AM, et al. (1996) Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348: 145-149.
8. Park SC, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, et al. (2011) Initial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: risk factors and visual field characteristics. Ophthalmology 118: 1782-1789.
9. Heijl A, Lundqvist L, (1984) The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 62: 658-664.
10. Anctil JL, Anderson DR, (1984) Early foveal involvement and generalized depression of the visual field in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102: 363-370.
11. Langerhorst CC, Carenini LL, Bakker D, De Bie-Raakman MA (1997) Measurements for description of very early glaucomatous field defects. In: Wall M, Heijl A, editors. Perimetry Update 1996/1997,. New York: Kugler.
12. Weber J, Schultze T, Ulrich H, (1989) The visual field in advanced glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 13: 47-50.
13. Zalta AH, (1991) Use of a central 10 degrees field and size V stimulus to evaluate and monitor small central islands of vision in end stage glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 75: 151-154.
14. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, (2000) False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 2201-2204.
15. Tibshirani R, (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 58: 267-268.
16. Wirght DB, London K (2009) Modern Regression Techniques Using R: A Practical Guide. Washington DC: SAGE Publications Ltd.
17. Japkowicz N (2011) Evaluating Learning Algorithms: A Classification Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Wilcox RR (2005) Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Suzuki Y, Araie M, Ohashi Y, (1993) Sectorization of the central 30 degrees visual field in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 100: 69-75.
20. Su D, Park SC, Simonson JL, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2012) Progression Pattern of Initial Parafoveal Scotomas in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology.
21. Haymes SA, LeBlanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chiasson LA, Chauhan BC, (2008) Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 3035-3041.
22. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Berry CC, Lee AC, Girkin CA, et al. (2003) Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals. Ophthalmology 110: 1895-1902.
23. Krakau CE (1985) A statistical trap in the evaluation of visual field decay. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 173: 19-21.
24. Holmin C, Krakau CE, (1982) Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases. A follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60: 267-274.
25. Spry PG, Bates AB, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC, (2000) Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 2192-2200.
26. Fung SS, Lemer C, Russell RA, Malik R, Crabb DP (2013) Are practical recommendations practiced? A national multi-centre cross-sectional study on frequency of visual field testing in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol.
27. Jansonius NM, (2010) On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 94: 1404-1405.
28. Zhu H, Crabb DP, Schlottmann PG, Lemij HG, Reus NJ, et al. (2010) Predicting visual function from the measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 5657-5666.
29. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR, (1990) The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31: 512-520.
30. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell N (1995) Determining progressive field loss. In: Mills RP, M. W, editors. Amsterdam,: Kugler & Ghedini. 31-36.
31. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, (1995) Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233: 750-755.
32. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A (1991) Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: Statpac 2. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, editors. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini.
33. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, (1997) Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2. Br J Ophthalmol 81: 1037-1042.
34. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J, (1997) Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 104: 1228-1236.
35. Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, McNaught AI, Westcott MC, Kamal D, et al. (2003) Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods. Br J Ophthalmol 87: 726-730.