The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma

Ophthalmology

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 332-339

  Sumi, Izumi ^a   Shirato, Shiroaki ^b   Matsumoto, Shun ^a   Araie, Makoto ^c  

^a TOKYO TEISHIN HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 0037317070     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01742-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Global initiative for the elimination of Avoidable Blindness. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997;1-35. WHO/PBL/97.61.
2. Nakae K, Kogure F, Nagaya S, Mishima S. Status of newly registered visual handicapped person in Japan. J Health Welfare Stat 1991;38:13-22.
3. Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Available data on blindness (update 1994). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1995;2:5-39.
4. Brown B. Introduction to low vision. The Low Vision Handbook. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc., 1997;3-5.
5. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976;6:393-415.
6. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
7. Sloane ME, Ball K, Owsley C, et al. The visual activities questionnaire: developing an instrument for assessing problems in everyday visual tasks. Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 1992;26-9. Tech Dig Ser; 1.
8. Bemth-Petersen P. Visual functioning in cataract patients. Methods of measuring and results. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981;59:198-205.
9. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:630-88.
10. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 1992;30:1111-26.
11. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:227-33.
12. Mills RP, Drance SM. Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1986;93:371-8.
13. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1419-25.
14. Duke-Elder S, Jay B. Simple glaucoma. System of Ophthalmology, vol. XI. St. Louis: Mosby, 1969;392-624.
15. Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1226-34.
16. Sumi I, Oda H, Shirato S. [Visual disability, stage of invalidity, visual acuity and visual field in glaucoma patients]. Atarashii Ganka 1995;12:943-7.
17. Sumi I, Matsumoto S, Okajima O, Shirato S. The relationship between visual disability and visual scores in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000;44:82-7.
18. Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, et al. Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1236-41.
19. Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA, Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2212-21.
20. Parrish RK II, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1447-55.
21. Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, et al. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:777-84.
22. Advanced glaucoma intervention study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
23. Weber J, Schultze T, Ulrich H. The visual field in advanced glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1989;13:47-50.
24. Araie M, Hori J, Koseki N. Comparison of visual field defects between normal-tension and primary open-angle glaucoma in the late stage of the disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:610-16.
25. Araie M, Arai M, Koseki N, Suzuki Y. Influence of myopic refraction on visual field defects in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1995;39:60-4.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
27. Sakuma A. Statistical Methods in Pharmacometrics. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, 1977:142-6.