Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: A thematic analysis

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Wright, Adam ^a,b,c   Maloney, Francine L ^c   Feblowitz, Joshua C ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BOSTON; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MEDICAL RECORDS, PROBLEM-ORIENTED;

EID: 80054792504     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-36     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Medical records that guide and teach. LL Weed, The New England journal of medicine 1968 278 12 652 657 concl 10.1056/NEJM196803212781204 5637250
2. Best Practices for Problem Lists in an EHR, http://library.ahima.org/ xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1-036244.hcsp?dDocName=bok1-036244
3. Information Management Processes (Standard IM 6.40), 2008 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois: Joint Commission Resources 2008
4. Clinical implications of an accurate problem list on heart failure treatment. DM Hartung J Hunt J Siemienczuk H Miller DR Touchette, Journal of general internal medicine 2005 20 2 143 147 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40206.x 15836547 (Pubitemid 40626992)
5. Ability to generate patient registries among practices with and without electronic health records. A Wright EA McGlinchey EG Poon CA Jenter DW Bates SR Simon, J Med Internet Res 2009 11 3 31 19674961
6. Comparison of Meaningful Use Objectives Between the Proposed Rule to the Final Rule, https://www.cms.gov/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/NPRM-vs-FR-Table- Comparison-Final.pdf
7. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. B Chaudhry J Wang S Wu M Maglione W Mojica E Roth SC Morton PG Shekelle, Annals of internal medicine 2006 144 10 742 752 16702590 (Pubitemid 46780634)
8. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. AX Garg NK Adhikari H McDonald MP Rosas-Arellano PJ Devereaux J Beyene J Sam RB Haynes, Jama 2005 293 10 1223 1238 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 15755945 (Pubitemid 40327908)
9. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. K Kawamoto CA Houlihan EA Balas DF Lobach, BMJ (Clinical research ed 2005 330 7494 765 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F
10. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. JA Osheroff JM Teich B Middleton EB Steen A Wright DE Detmer, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007 14 2 141 145 10.1197/jamia.M2334 17213487 (Pubitemid 46275496)
11. A description and functional taxonomy of rule-based decision support content at a large integrated delivery network. A Wright H Goldberg T Hongsermeier B Middleton, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007 14 4 489 496 10.1197/jamia.M2364 17460131 (Pubitemid 46963050)
12. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic. HC Szeto RK Coleman P Gholami BB Hoffman MK Goldstein, The American journal of managed care 2002 8 1 37 43 11814171 (Pubitemid 34116297)
13. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. B Kaplan NT Shaw, Methods of information in medicine 2004 43 3 215 231 15227551 (Pubitemid 38915528)
14. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. C Pope N Mays, BMJ (Clinical research ed 1995 311 6996 42 45
15. Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. C Pope P van Royen R Baker, Quality & safety in health care 2002 11 2 148 152 10.1136/qhc.11.2.148 21618738 (Pubitemid 35265277)
16. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? S Sofaer, Health services research 1999 34 5 Pt 2 1101 1118 10591275
17. Participant observation. JP Spradley, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1980
18. The ethnographic interview. JP Spradley, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1979
19. Rapid assessment process: an introduction. J Beebe, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press 2001
20. Rapid Assessment of Clinical Information Systems in the Healthcare Setting. An Efficient Method for Time-pressed Evaluation. CK McMullen JS Ash DF Sittig A Bunce K Guappone R Dykstra J Carpenter J Richardson A Wright, Methods of information in medicine 50 2
21. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. BG Glaser AL Strauss, Chicago,: Aldine Pub. Co 1967