Single centre prospective study of the efficacy of percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

British Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 459-464

  Joseph, R N ^a   Swift, A J ^a,b   Maliakal, P J ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Methylmethacrylate; Radiology; Spine; Vertebra

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; COMPRESSION FRACTURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; KYPHOPLASTY; KYPHOSIS; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CEMENT AUGMENTATION; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALEFFO 41 QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE SURGERY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; ADULT; AGED; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTOPLASTY; FEMALE; FRACTURES, COMPRESSION; HUMANS; KYPHOPLASTY; MALE; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBROPLASTY;

EID: 84881471757     PISSN: 02688697     EISSN: 1360046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.752431     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. OKanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17 : 1726-33
2. B luic D, N guyen N D, M ilch V E, et al.M ortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 2009; 301 : 513-1
3. Johansen A, Evans R, Bartlett C, Stone M. Trauma admissions in the elderly: how does a patient ' s age aff ect the likelihood of their being admitted to hospital after a fracture. Injury 1997; 29 : 779-84
4. Osteroporosis in the European Union in 2 008. T en Years of Progress and Ongoing Challenges, International Osteoporosis Foundation. http://www. iofbonehealth.org/osteoporosis-european-unionten- years-progress-And-ongoing- challenges-2008
5. S tevenson M D, D avis S E, K anis J A. The hospitalisation costs and out-patient costs of fragility fractures. Women ' s Health Med 2006; 3 : 149-51
6. G alibert P, D eramond H, R osat P, L e Gars D. P reliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 1987; 33: 166- 8.
7. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al.A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 : 557-68
8. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, et al.A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 : 569-79
9. Wardlaw D, Cummings S, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al.Effi cacy and Safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373 : 1016-24
10. Berenson J, Pfl ugmacher R, J arzem P, et al.Balloon Kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 : 225-35
11. Gangi A, Clark WA. Have recent vertebroplasty trials changed the indications for vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 : 677-80
12. Munk PL, Liu DM, Murphy KP, et al. Eff ectiveness of vertebroplasty: a recent controversy. Can Assoc Radiol J 2009; 60 : 170-1
13. B aerlocher M O, M unk P L, L iu D M. T rials of vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 : 2098
14. Bono CM, Heggeness M, Mick C, Resnick D, Watters WC III. North American Spine Society: newly released vertebroplasty randomized controlled trials: a tale of two trials. Spine 2010; 10 : 238-40
15. Klazen CA, Lohle PNM, Jolande de Vries, et al.Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376 : 1085-92
16. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Q uality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10 : 150-60
17. Brodano GB, Amendola L, Martikos K, et al. Vertebroplasty:benefi ts are more than risks in selected and evidence based patients. A retrospective study of 59 patients. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 : 1265-71
18. Chew C, Ritchie M, O ' Dwyer PJ, Edwards R. A prospective study of percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with myeloma and spinal metastases. Clin Radiol 2011; 66 : 1193-6
19. Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: long term evaluation and clinical outcomes. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 : 1415-8
20. B urton A W, M endoza T, G ebhardt R, et al. Vertebral compression fracture with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: experience in 407 patients with 1156 fractures in a tertiary cancer center. Pain Med 2011 ; 12 : 1750-7
21. Mpotsaris A, Abdolvahabi R, Hoffl eith B, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fractures of benign ormalignant origin: a prospective study of 1188 patients with follow up of 12 months. Dtsch Ä rztebl Int 2011; 108 : 331-8
22. Wang HK, Lu K, Liang CL, et al.Comparing clinical outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Med 2010; 11 : 1659-65
23. Anselmetti GC, Marcia S, Saba L, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty: Multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients. Eur J Radiol 2012. Epub ahead of print doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.005.
24. Firanescu C, Lolhe PN, de Vries J, et al.A randomised sham controlled trial of vertebroplasty for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VERTOS IV). Trials 2011; 12 : 93.