Using ego motion feedback to improve the immersion in virtual reality environments

Joint 41st International Symposium on Robotics and 6th German Conference on Robotics 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK 2010

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1172-1177

  Noth, Sebastian ^a   Iossifidis, Ioannis ^a   Schrowangen, Eva ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b WESTPHALIAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRIVER MODELS; DRIVING SIMULATION; EGO MOTION; HEAD TRACKING; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN DRIVING; HUMAN OPERATOR; VIRTUAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENT;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84881431657     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Kemeny, A.; Panerai, P.: Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol 7, 1, 2003.
2. Zikovitz C, Harris L: Head tilt during driving, Ergonomics 42: pp. 740-746, 1999.
3. Panerai F, Cornilleau-Pérèz V, Droulez J.: Contribution of extra-retinal signals to the scaling of object distance during self-motion, Percept. Psychophys. 64, 717-731, 2002.
4. Pretto, P.; Ogier, M.; Bülthoff, H.; Bresciani, J.: Influence of the size of the field of view on motion perception, Computers and Graphics (in press), 2009.
5. Peh, C.; Panerai, F.; Droulez, J.; Cornilleau-Pérèz, V.; Cheong, L.: Absolute distance perception during in-depth head movement: calibrating optic flow with extra-retinal information, Vis. Res. 42, 1991-2003, 2002.
6. Creem-Regehr, S.; Willemsen, P.; Gooch, A.; Thompson, W.: The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual environments, Perception 34, 2, 191-204. 2005.
7. Cutting, J.: How the eye measures reality and virtual reality, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29 (1), 27-36. 1997.
8. Mourant, R., Ahmad, N.; Jaeger, K.; Lin, Y.: Optic flow and geometric field of view in a driving simulator display.
9. Land, M.; Horwood, J.: Which parts of the road guide steering? Nature 377, 339 - 340. 1995.
10. Cacciabue, P.; Saad, F.: Behavioural Adaptations to Changes in the Road Transport System Paris: OECD expert group.
11. OECD (1990). Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system. Paris: OECD expert group.
12. Cacciabue, P., Saad, F.: Behavioural adaptations to driver support systems: a modelling and road safety perspective Cognition, Technology, andWork 10. 31- 39. 2008.
13. Ervin, R.; Sayer, J.; LeBlanc, D.; Bogard, S.; Mefford, M.L.; Hagan, M.; Bareket, Z.; Winkler, C.: Automotive Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) Field Operational Test - Methodology and Results NHTSA Report HS 809 901. 2005.
14. Lee, J.; McGehee, D.; Brown, T.; Reyes, M.: Collision Warning, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Rear-end Collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator Human Factors, 44(2). 314-334. 2002.
15. Seppelt, B.; Lee, J.: Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 65. 192-205. 2007.
16. http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii.