Modelling stomatal conductance in response to environmental factors

Plant, Cell and Environment

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1691-1699

  Buckley, Thomas N ^a,c   Mott, Keith A ^b  

^a SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ABA; CO2; Humidity; Light; Temperature

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT STRESS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE; HUMIDITY; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STOMATA; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

AGROBACTERIUM; RHIZOBIUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84881310232     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: 13653040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12140     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Baldocchi D. (1994) An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models. Tree Physiology 14, 1069-1079.
2. Ball J.T., Woodrow I.E. & Berry J.A. (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. J. Biggens ), pp. 221-224. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands.
3. Ball M.C. & Farquhar G.D. (1984) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to long term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiology 74, 1-6.
4. Bartlett M.K., Scoffoni C., Ardy R., Zhang Y., Sun S., Cao K. & Sack L. (2012) Rapid determination of comparative drought tolerance traits: using an osmometer to predict turgor loss point. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3, 880-888.
5. Bartlett M.K., Scoffoni C. & Sack L. (2012) The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 15, 393-405.
6. Brodribb T.J. & Jordan G.J. (2008) Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 1557-1564.
7. Buckley T.N. (2005) The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168, 275-292.
8. 2. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 1951-1961.
9. Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (2002a) Dynamics of stomatal water relations during the humidity response: implications of two hypothetical mechanisms. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 407-419.
10. Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (2002b) Stomatal water relations and the control of hydraulic supply and demand. Progress in Botany 63, 309-325.
11. Buckley T.N., Farquhar G.D. & Mott K.A. (1997) Qualitative effects of patchy stomatal conductance distribution features on gas exchange calculations. Plant, Cell & Environment 20, 867-880.
12. Buckley T.N., Farquhar G.D. & Mott K.A. (1999) Carbon-water balance and patchy stomatal conductance. Oecologia 118, 132-143.
13. Buckley T.N., Farquhar G.D. & Miller J.M. (2002) The mathematics of linked optimisation for water and nitrogen use in a canopy. Silva Fennica 36, 639-669.
14. Buckley T.N., Mott K.A. & Farquhar G.D. (2003) A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1767-1786.
15. Buckley T.N., Sack L. & Gilbert M.E. (2011) The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status. Plant Physiology 156, 962-973.
16. Buckley T.N., Turnbull T.L. & Adams M.A. (2012) Simple models for stomatal conductance derived from a process model: cross-validation against sap flux data. Plant, Cell & Environment 35, 1647-1662.
17. Buckley T.N., Cescatti A. & Farquhar G.D. (2013) What does optimisation theory actually predict about crown profiles of photosynthetic capacity, when models incorporate greater realism? Plant, Cell & Environment, doi: 10.1111/pce.12091.
18. Busch F. (2013) Opinion: the red-light response of stomatal movement is sensed by the redox state of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Photosynthesis Research. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9805-6.
19. Chambers J.L., Hinckley T.M., Cox G.S., Metcalf C.L. & Aslin R.G. (1985) Boundaryline analysis and models of leaf conductance for four oak-hickoryforest species. Forest Science 31, 437-450.
20. 2 exchange studies. Plant, Cell & Environment 14, 593-599.
21. Chen Z.-H., Hills A., Baetz U., Amtmann A., Lew V.L. & Blatt M.R. (2012) Systems dynamic modeling of the stomatal guard cell predicts emergent behaviors in transport, signaling, and volume control. Plant Physiology 159, 1235-1251.
22. Cochard H., Nardini A. & Coll L. (2004) Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance? Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 1257-1267.
23. Cochard H., Venisse J.S., Barigah T.S., Brunel N., Herbette S., Guilliot A., Tyree M.T. & Sakr S. (2007) Putative role of aquaporins in variable hydraulic conductance of leaves in response to light. Plant Physiology 143, 122-133.
24. Cowan I.R. (1972) Oscillations in stomatal conductance and plant functioning associated with stomatal conductance: observations and a model. Planta 106, 185-219.
25. Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 31, 471-505.
26. Delwiche M.J. & Cooke J.R. (1977) An analytical model of the hydraulic aspects of stomatal dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 69, 113-141.
27. Dewar R. (1995) Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 365-372.
28. Dewar R. (2002) The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu-Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1383-1398.
29. Diaz-Espejo A., Buckley T.N., Sperry J.S., etal. (2012) Steps toward an improvement in process-based models of water use by fruit trees: a case study in olive. Agricultural Water Management 114, 37-49.
30. Doheny-Adams T., Hunt L., Franks P.J., Beerling D.J. & Gray J.E. (2012) Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 547-555.
31. Edwards M., Meidner H. & Sheriff D.W. (1976) Direct measurement of turgor pressure potentials of guard cells. II. The mechanical advantage of subsidiary cells, the spannungsphase, and the optimum leaf water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 27, 163-171.
32. Egea G., Verhoef A. & Vidale P.L. (2011) Towards an improved and more flexible representation of water stress in coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151, 1370-1384.
33. Ewers B.E., Oren R., Phillips N., Stromgren M. & Linder S. (2001) Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. Tree Physiology 21, 841-850.
34. Farquhar G.D. & Wong S.C. (1984) An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 191-209.
35. 2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78-90.
36. 2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 10343-10347.
37. Franks P.J. & Farquhar G.D. (2007) The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiology 143, 78-87.
38. Franks P.J., Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 20, 142-145.
39. Franks P.J., Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1998) A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant, Cell & Environment 21, 94-100.
40. Gao Q., Zhao P., Zeng X., Cai X. & Shen W. (2002) A model of stomatal conductance to quantify the relationship between leaf transpiration, microclimate and soil water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1373-1381.
41. Gavaghan D., Garny A., Maini P.K. & Kohl P. (2006) Mathematical models in physiology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 364, 1099-1106.
42. Givnish T.J. (1986) Optimal stomatal conductance, allocation of energy between leaves and roots, and the marginal cost of transpiration. In: On the economy of plant form and function (ed. T.J. Givnish ), pp. 171-213. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Gross L.J., Kirschbaum M.U.F. & Pearcy R.W. (1991) A dynamic model of photosynthesis in varying light taking account of stomatal conductance, C3-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and Rubisco activation. Plant, Cell & Environment 14, 881-893.
44. Gutschick V.P. & Simonneau T. (2002) Modelling stomatal conductance of field-grown sunflower under varying soil water content and leaf environment: comparison of three models of stomatal response to leaf environment and coupling with an abscisic acid-based model of stomatal response to soil drying. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1423-1434.
45. Haefner J.W., Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (1997) A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 20, 1087-1097.
46. Hills A., Chen Z.-H., Amtmann A., Blatt M.R. & Lew V.L. (2012) OnGuard, a computational platform for quantitative kinetic modeling of guard cell physiology. Plant Physiology 159, 1026-1042.
47. Jarvis P.G. (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B 273, 593-610.
48. 2-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant, Cell & Environment 32, 968-979.
49. Kirschbaum M.U.F., Gross L.J. & Pearcy R.W. (1988) Observed and modelled stomatal responses to dynamic light environments in the shade plant AIocasia macrorrhiza. Plant, Cell & Environment 11, 111-121.
50. Kirschbaum M.U.F., Kuppers M., Schneider H., Giersch C. & Noe S. (1998) Modelling photosynthesis in fluctuating light with inclusion of stomatal conductance, biochemical activation and pools of key photosynthetic intermediates. Planta 204, 16-26.
51. 2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment 29, 1794-1800.
52. Lee S.C. & Luan S. (2012) ABA signal transduction at the crossroad of biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell & Environment 35, 53-60.
53. Leuning R. (1990) Modeling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of eucalyptus-grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 159-175.
54. Leuning R. (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 339-357.
55. Li S., Assmann S.M. & Albert R. (2006) Predicting essential components of signal transduction networks: a dynamic model of guard cell abscisic acid signaling. PLoS Biology 4, 1732-1748.
56. Lloyd J. (1991) Modeling stomatal responses to environment in macadamia-integrifolia. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 649-660.
57. Mäkelä A., Givnish T.J., Berninger F., Buckley T.N., Farquhar G.D. & Hari P. (2002) Challenges and opportunities of the optimality approach in plant ecology. Silva Fennica 36, 605-614.
58. Manzoni S., Vico G., Katul G., Fay P.A., Polley W., Palmroth S. & Porporato A. (2011) Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates. Functional Ecology 25, 456-467.
59. 2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant, Cell & Environment 22, 1475-1495.
60. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytologist 149, 247-264.
61. Medlyn B.E., Duursma R.A., Eamus D., Ellsworth D.S., Prentice I.C., Barton C.V.M., Crous K.Y., de Angelis P., Freeman M. & Wingate L. (2011) Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology 17, 2134-2144.
62. 2. Plant Physiology 140, 771-778.
63. Mott K.A. (2007) Leaf hydraulic conductivity and stomatal responses to humidity in amphistomatous leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 30, 1444-1449.
64. Mott K.A. (2009) Opinion: stomatal responses to light and CO2 depend on the mesophyll. Plant, Cell & Environment 32, 1479-1486.
65. Mott K.A. & Peak D. (2010) Stomatal responses to humidity and temperature in darkness. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 1084-1090.
66. Mott K.A. & Peak D. (2013) Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 36, 936-944.
67. 2. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 1299-1306.
68. Nagele T., Henkel S., Hormiller I., Sauter T., Sawodny O., Ederer M. & Heyer A.G. (2010) Mathematical modeling of the central carbohydrate metabolism in arabidopsis reveals a substantial regulatory influence of vacuolar invertase on whole plant carbon metabolism. Plant Physiology 153, 260-272.
69. 2 pool. Functional Plant Biology 31, 1195-1204.
70. Ooba M. & Takahashi H. (2003) Effect of asymmetric stomatal response on gas-exchange dynamics. Ecological Modelling 164, 65-82.
71. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Katul G.G., Pataki D.E., Ewers B.E., Phillips N. & Schafer K.V.R. (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22, 1515-1526.
72. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Ewers B.E., Pataki D.E., Phillips N. & Megonigal J.P. (2001) Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxodium distichum L. forest: hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects. Oecologia 126, 21-29.
73. Peak D. & Mott K.A. (2011) A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment 34, 162-178.
74. Rand R.H., Upadhyaya S.K., Cooke J.R. & Storti D.W. (1981) Hopf bifurcation in a stomatal oscillator. Journal of Mathematical Biology 12, 1-11.
75. Ruffel S., Krouk G. & Coruzzi G.M. (2010) A systems view of responses to nutritional cues in arabidopsis: toward a paradigm shift for predictive network modeling. Plant Physiology 152, 445-452.
76. Schurr U., Gollan T. & Schulze E.D. (1992) Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. 2. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic-acid imported from the xylem sap. Plant, Cell & Environment 15, 561-567.
77. Schymanski S.J., Roderick M.L., Sivapalan M., Hutley L.B. & Beringer J. (2008) A canopy-scale test of the optimal water-use hypothesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 97-111.
78. Scoffoni C., Pou A., Aasamaa K. & Sack L. (2008) The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: new evidence from two experimental methods. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 1803-1812.
79. Scoffoni C., Rawls M., McKown A., Cochard H. & Sack L. (2011) Decline of leaf hydraulic conductance with dehydration: relationship to leaf size and venation architecture. Plant Physiology 156, 832-843.
80. Scoffoni C., McKown A.D., Rawls M. & Sack L. (2012) Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status: quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 643-658.
81. Sharp R.G. & Davies W.J. (2009) Variability among species in the apoplastic pH signalling response to drying soils. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 4361-4370.
82. Shimazaki K., Doi M., Assmann S.M. & Kinoshita T. (2007) Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58, 219-247.
83. Sinclair T.R., Zwieniecki M.A. & Holbrook N.M. (2008) Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 132, 446-451.
84. Sperry J., Adler F.R., Campbell G.S. & Comstock J.P. (1998) Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant, Cell & Environment 21, 347-359.
85. Tardieu F. & Davies W.J. (1993) Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 16, 341-349.
86. Tardieu F. & Simonneau T. (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 419-432.
87. Terashima I. (1992) Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31, 195-212.
88. Vialet-Chabrand S., Dreyer E. & Brendel O. (2013) Performance of a new dynamic model for predicting diurnal time courses of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell & Environment. doi: 10.1111/pce.12086.
89. Wang Y.Z., Papanatsiou M., Eisenach C., Karnik R., Williams M., Hills A., Lew V.L. & Blatt M.R. (2012) Systems dynamic modeling of a guard cell Cl-channel mutant uncovers an emergent homeostatic network regulating stomatal transpiration. Plant Physiology 160, 1956-1967.
90. Whitehead D., Barbour M.M., Griffin K.L., Turnbull M.H. & Tissue D.T. (2011) Effects of leaf age and tree size on stomatal and mesophyll limitations to photosynthesis in mountain beech (Nothofagus solandrii var. cliffortiodes). Tree Physiology 31, 985-996.
91. Wilkinson S. (1999) PH as a stress signal. Plant Growth Regulation 29, 87-99.
92. Wilkinson S. & Davies W.J. (1997) Xylem sap pH increase: a drought signal received at the apoplastic face of the guard cell that involves the suppression of saturable abscisic acid uptake by the epidermal symplast. Plant Physiology 113, 559-573.
93. Zwieniecki M.A., Brodribb T.J. & Holbrook N.M. (2007) Hydraulic design of leaves: insights from rehydration kinetics. Plant, Cell & Environment 30, 910-921.