Effect of asymmetric stomatal response on gas-exchange dynamics

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-82

  Ooba, Makoto ^a   Takahashi, Hidenori ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Asymmetric response; Leaf model; Light; Stomatal conductance; Water use

Indexed keywords

GAS EXCHANGE; PLANT COMMUNITY; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER USE;

EID: 0038221195     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00012-7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen, M.T., Pearcy, R.W., 2000. Stomatal behavior and photosynthetic performance under dynamic light regimes in a seasonally dry tropical rain forest. Oecologia 122, 470-478.
2. Asner, G.P., Wessman, C.A., 1997. Scaling PAR absorption from the leaf to the landscape level in spatially heterogeneous ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 103, 81-97.
3. 2 assimilation to changes in irradiance: laboratory and field data and a model for beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Exp. Bot. 47, 639-645.
4. Cescatti, A., 1997. Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. I. Model structure and algorithms. Ecol. Model. 101, 263-274.
5. Chazdon, R.L., 1988. Sunflecks and their importance to forest understorey plants. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18, 1-63.
6. Claus, S., Wernecke, P., Pigla, U., Dubsky, G., 1995. A dynamic model describing leaf temperature and transpiration of wheat plants. Ecol. Model. 81, 31-40.
7. Davies, W.J., Kozlowski, T.T., 1974. Stomatal responses of five woodyangiosperms to light intensity and humidity. Can. J. Bot. 52, 1525-1534.
8. Fay, P.A., Knapp, A.K., 1995. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to shade in sorghum, soybean, and eastern gamagrass. Physiol. Plant 94, 613-620.
9. Génard, M., Baret, F., Simon, D., 2000. A 3D peach canopy model used to evaluate the effect of tree architecture and density on photosynthesis at a range of scales. Ecol. Model. 128, 197-209.
10. Grantz, D.A., Zeiger, E., 1986. Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean. Plant Physiol. 81, 865-868.
11. Gross, L.J., 1982. Photosynthetic dynamics in varying light environments: a model and its application to whole leaf carbon gain. Ecology 63, 84-93.
12. 3-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and Rubisco activation. Plant Cell Environ. 14, 881-893.
13. Horie, T., 1978. Studies on photosynthesis and primary production of rice plants in relation to meteorological environments. I. Gaseous diffusive resistances, photosynthesis and transpiration in the leaves as influenced by radiation intensity and wind speed. J. Agric. Meteorol. 34, 125-136.
14. Jones, H.G., 1992. Plant and Microclimate, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 428 pp.
15. Jones, H.G., 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 387-398.
16. Karlsson, P.E., Assmann, S.M., 1990. Rapid and specifc modulation of stomatal conductance by blue light in ivy (Hedera helix): an approach to assess the stomatal limitation of carbon assimilation. Plant Physiol. 94, 440-470.
17. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Gross, L.J., Pearcy, R.W., 1988. Observed and modelled stomatal responses to dynamic light environments in the shade plant Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 111-121
18. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Kuppers, M., Schneider, H., Giersch, C., Noe, S., 1998. Modelling photosynthesis in fluctuating light with inclusion of stomatal conductance, biochemical activation and pools of key photosynthetic intermediates. Planta 204, 16-26.
19. 4 grasses: consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74, 113-123.
20. Knapp, A.K., Smith, W.K., 1988. Effect of water stress on stomatal and photosynthetic responses in subalpine plants to cloud patterns. Am. J. Bot. 75, 851-858.
21. Knapp, A.K., Smith, W.K., 1990. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight. Physiol. Plant 78, 160-165.
22. Krall, J.P., Sheveleva, E.V., Pearcy, R.W., 1995. Regulation of photosynthetic induction state in high- and low-light-grown soybean and Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don. Plant Physiol. 109, 307-317.
23. Liu, D.L., 1996. Incorporating diurnal light variation and canopy light attenuation into analytical equations for calculating daily gross photosynthesis. Ecol. Model. 93, 175-189.
24. Mansfield, T.A., Heath, O.V.S., 1963. Studies in stomatal behaviour: IX. Photoperiodic effects on rhythmic phenomena in Xanthium pennsylvanicum. J. Exp. Bot. 14, 334-352.
25. Martens, S.N., Breshears, D.D., Meyer, C.W., 2000. Spatial distributions of understory light along the grassland/forest continuum: effects of cover, height, and spatial pattern of tree canopies. Ecol. Model 126, 79-93.
26. Nishimura, S., Koizumi, H., Tang, Y., 1998. Spatial and temporal variation in photon flux density on rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf surface. Plant Prod. Sci. 1, 30-36.
27. Ogata, K., 1998. System Dynamics, 3rd ed. Prantice-Hall, New Jersey, 758 pp.
28. Papoulis, A., 1984. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 576 pp.
29. 4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58, 19-25.
30. Pearcy, R.W., 1990. Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 421-453.
31. Pearcy, R.W., Roden, J.S., Gamon, J.A., 1990. Sunfleck dynamics in relation to canopy structure in a soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) canopy. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 52, 359-372.
32. Pearcy, R.W., Chazdon, R.L., Gross, L.J., Mott, K.A., 1994. Photosynthetic utilization of sunflecks: a temporally patchy resource on a time scale of seconds to minutes. In: Caldwell, M.M., Pearcy, R.W. (Eds.), Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 175-208.
33. Pearcy, R.W., Gross, L.J., He, D., 1997. An improved dynamic model of photosynthesis for estimation of carbon gain in sunfleck light regimes. Plant Cell Environ. 20, 411-424.
34. Pepin, S., Livingston, N.J., 1997. Rates of stomatal opening in conifer seedlings in relation to air temperature and daily carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ. 20, 1462-1472.
35. Pfitsch, W.A., Pearcy, R.W., 1989. Daily carbon gain by Adenocaulon bicolor (Asteraceae), a redwood forest understory herb, in relation to its light environment. Oecologia 80, 465-470.
36. Pollard, D.F.W., 1970. The effect of rapidly changing light on the rate of photosynthesis in largetooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Can. J. Bot. 48, 823-829.
37. Pons, T.L., Pearcy, R.W., Seemann, J.R., 1992. Photosynthesis in flashing light in soybean leaves grown in different conditions: I. Photosynthetic induction state and regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 569-576.
38. Ross, J., Mõttus, M., 2000. Stastistical treatment of sunfleck length inside willow coppice. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 104, 215-231.
39. Sims, D.A., Pearcy, R.W., 1993. Sunfleck frequency and duration affects growth rate of the understorey plant Alocasia macrorrhiza. Funct. Ecol. 7, 683-689.
40. Stenberg, P., 1995. Penumbra in within-shoot and between-shoot shading in conifers and its significance for photosynthesis. Ecol. Model. 77, 215-231.
41. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C., Pearcy, R.W., 1992. Dynamic stomatal behaviour and its role in carbon gain during lightflecks of a gap phase and an understory Piper species acclimated to high and low light. Oecologia 92, 222-228.
42. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C., Pearcy, R.W., 1993. Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species: I. VPD effects on the transient stomatal response to lightflecks. Oecologia 94, 388-394.
43. Tang, Y., 1997. Light. In: Prasad, M.N.V. (Ed.), Plant Ecophysiology. Wiley, New York, pp. 3-40.
44. Tang, Y., Washitani, I., 1995. Characteristics of small-scale heterogeneity in light availability within a Miscanthus sinensis canopy. Ecol. Res. 10, 189-197.
45. Tang, Y., Washitani, I., Iwaki, H., 1992. Seasonal variations of microsite light availability within a Miscanthus sinensis canopy. Ecol. Res. 7, 97-106.
46. Tappeiner, U., Cernusca, A., 1998. Model simulation of spatial distribution of photosynthesis in structurally differing plant communities in the Central Caucasus. Ecol. Model. 113, 201-223.
47. Upadhyaya, S.K., Rand, R.H., Cooke, J.R., 1988. Role of stomataloscillations on transpiration, assimilation and water-use efficiency of plants. Ecol. Model. 41, 27-40.
48. Ustin, S.L., Woodward, R.A., Barbour, M.G., Hatfield, J.A., 1984. Relationship between sunfleck dynamics and red fir seedlingdistribution. Ecology 65, 1420-1428.
49. Valladares, F., Allen, M.T., Pearcy, R.W., 1997. Photosynthetic-responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical-rainforest shrubs occuring along a light gradient. Oecologia 111, 505-514.
50. Vierling, L.A., Wessman, C.A., 2000. Photosynthetically activeradiation heterogeneity within a monodominant Congolese rain forestcanopy. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 103, 265-278.
51. Whitehead, D., Teskey, R.O., 1995. Dynamic response of stomata tochanging irradiance in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol. 15, 245-251.
52. Woods, D.B., Turner, N.C., 1971. Stomatal response to changing lightby four tree species of varying shade tolerance. New Phytol. 70, 77-84.
53. Young, D.R., Smith, W.K., 1979. Influence of sunflecks on thetemperature and water relations of two subalpine understory congeners. Oecologia 43, 195-205.