Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 146, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-108

  Dechrugsa, Sumeth ^a,b   Kantachote, Duangporn ^c   Chaiprapat, Sumate ^c  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b CENTER OF EXCELLENCE ON HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE MANAGEMENT HSM   (Thailand)

^c PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Biochemical methane potential (BMP); Co digestion; Grass; Inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR); Pig manure

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; METHANE;

BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; CODIGESTION; GRASS; INOCULUM TO SUBSTRATE RATIOS; PIG MANURES;

SUBSTRATES;

LATEX; METHANE; RUBBER;

BIOASSAY; BIODEGRADATION; DIGESTIBILITY; DOMINANCE; GRASS; INOCULATION; MANURE; METHANE; PIG; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; GRASS; INOCULATION; INOCULUM TO SUBSTRATE RATIO; MANURE; MEMBRANE REACTOR; METHANOGEN; MOISTURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

SUIDAE; UROCHLOA MUTICA;

BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL (BMP); CO-DIGESTION; GRASS; INOCULUM TO SUBSTRATE RATIO (ISR); PIG MANURE;

ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; FATTY ACIDS; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LATEX; LIGNIN; MANURE; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; METHANE; POACEAE; RUBBER; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84881295531     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.051     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alzate M.E., Munoz R., Rogalla F., Fdz-Polanco F., Prez-Elvira S.I. Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 123:488-494.
2. Angelidaki I., Alves M., Bolzonella D., Borzacconi L., Campos J.L., Guwy A.J., Kalyuzhnyi S., Jenicek P., Lier J.B. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:927-934.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-Water 1999, American Public Health Association, Washington.
4. Charnnok B., Suksaroj T., Boonswang P., Chaiprapat S. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in biogas using dissolved oxygen in the extreme acidic biofiltration operation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131:492-499.
5. Department of Livestock Development, 2012. Annual statistics summary of swine and raisers. <. http://www.dld.go.th/ict/th/images/stories/stat_web/yearly/2554/pig54/report_pig_54.pdf.
6. Hansen T.L., Schmidt J.E., Angelidaki I., Marca E., Jansen J.C., Mosbk H., Christensen T.H. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. (Oxford) 2004, 24:393-400.
7. Hniman A., Prasertsan P., O-Tong S. Community analysis of thermophilic hydrogen-producing consortia enriched from Thailand hot spring with mixed xylose and glucose. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:14217-14226.
8. Ho J., Sung S. Methanogenic activities in anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) treating synthetic municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2191-2196.
9. Ince O., Ince B.K., Yenigun O. Determination of potential methane production capacity of a granular sludge from a pilot-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor using a specific methanogenic activity test. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76:573-578.
10. Insam H., Franke-Whittle I., Goberna M. Microbes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Waste Treatment. Microbes at Work 2010, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 4-13.
11. Labatut R.A., Angenent L.A., Scott N.R. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:2255-2264.
12. Lopes W.S., Leite V.D., Prasad S. Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 94:261-266.
13. Lozano C.J., Mendoza M.V., Arango M.C., Monroy E.F. Microbiological characterization and specific methanogenic activity of anaerobe sludges used in urban solid waste treatment. Waste Manage. (Oxford) 2009, 29:704-711.
14. Maya-Altamira L., Baun A., Angelidaki I., Schmidt J.E. Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters. Water Res. 2008, 42:2195-2203.
15. Moller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:485-495.
16. Neves L., Oliveira R., Alves M.M. Influence of inoculums activity on the bio-methjanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculums ratios. Process Biochem. 2004, 39:2019-2024.
17. Panichnumsin, P., Nopharatana, A., Ahring, B., Chaiprasert, P., 2006. The 2nd Joint International Conference on "Sustainable Energy and Environment, Bangkok, Thailand.
18. Panichnumsin P., Nopharatana A., Ahring B., Chaiprasert P. Production of methane by co-digestion of cassava pulp with various concentrations of pig manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1117-1124.
19. Pattanapongchai A., Limmeechokchai B. Least cost energy planning in Thailand: A case of biogas upgradinging in palm oil industry. Songklajnakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 33(6):705-715.
20. Raposo F., Banks C.J., Siegert I., Heaven S., Borja R. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1444-1450.
21. Raposo F., Borja R., Rinncon B., Jimenez A.M. Assessment of process control parameters in the biochemical methane potential of sunflower oil cake. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:1235-1244.
22. Raposo F., Borjaa R., Martin M.A., Martin A., Rubia M.A., Rincon B. Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149:70-77.
23. Rincon B., Banks C.J., Heaven S. Biochemical methane potential of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): influence of growth stage and storage practice. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8179-8184.
24. Rittmann B.E., McCarty P.L. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications 2001, McGraw-Hill, Singapore. international ed.
25. Saritpongteeraka K., Chaiprapat S. Effects of pH adjustment by parawood ash and effluent recycle ratio on the performance of anaerobic baffled reactors treating high sulfate waste water. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:8987-8994.
26. Wang Q., Kuninobu M., Ogawa H.I., Kato Y. Degradation of volatile fatty acids in highly efficient anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 1999, 16:407-416.
27. Xie S., Lawlor P.G., Frost J.P., Hu Z., Zhan X. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:5728-5733.