Production of methane by co-digestion of cassava pulp with various concentrations of pig manure

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1117-1124

  Panichnumsin, Pornpan ^a,b   Nopharatana, Annop ^a   Ahring, Birgitte ^c   Chaiprasert, Pawinee ^a  

^a KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

^b NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY   (Thailand)

^c Media and Information technologies   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; C:N ratio; Cassava pulp; Manihot esculenta Crantz; Methane potential; Pig manure

Indexed keywords

C:N RATIO; CASSAVA PULP; MANIHOT ESCULENTA CRANTZ; METHANE POTENTIAL; PIG MANURE; PIG MANURES;

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; CARBOHYDRATES; FEEDSTOCKS; MANURES; METHANE; STARCH; SUBSTRATES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

AMMONIUM; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; CARBOHYDRATE; CASSAVA; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GROWTH RATE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; MANURE; METHANE; MICROBIAL ECOLOGY; PIG; STARCH; SUBSTRATE;

EID: 77954817272     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Paepatung N., Songkasiri W., Kullavanijaya P., Leethochawalit M., Chaiprasert P., Noppharatana A. Assessment of biogas potential and technology for agricultural residues and energy crops in Thailand. Pilot Plant Development and Training Institute 2008, King Mongut's University of Technology, Thonburi, [in Thai].
2. Sriroth K., Chollakup R., Chotineeranat S., Piyachomkwan K., Oates C.G. Processing of cassava waste for improved biomass utilization. Bioresource Technology 2000, 71(1):63-69.
3. Parawira W., Read J.S., Mattiasson B., Bjornsson L. Energy production from agricultural residues: high methane yields in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008, 32(1):44-50.
4. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99(17):7928-7940.
5. Hartmann H., Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal waste. Biomethanization of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste 2002, 181-200. IWA Publishing, London. J. Mata-Alvarez (Ed.).
6. Callaghan F.J., Wase D.A.J., Thayanithy K., Forster C.F. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002, 22(1):71-77.
7. Murto M., Bjornsson L., Mattiasson B. Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Journal of Environmental Management 2004, 70(2):101-107.
8. Kaparaju P., Rintala J. Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2005, 43(2):175-188.
9. Lehtomaki A., Huttunen S., Rintala J.A. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2007, 51(3):591-609.
10. Paepatung N., Kullavanijaya P., Loapitinan O., Songkasiri W., Noppharatana A., Chaiprasert P. Assessment of biomass potential for biogas production in Thailand. Pilot Plant Development and Training Institute 2006, King Mongut's University of Technology, Thonburi, [in Thai].
11. Mladenovska Z., Dabrowski S., Ahring B.K. Anaerobic digestion of manure and mixture of manure with lipids: biogas reactor performance and microbial community analysis. Water Science and Technology 2003, 48(6):271-278.
12. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water 1995, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 19th ed.
13. AOAC Official method of analysis 1995, Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Virginia. 16th ed.
14. AACC Approved methods of the AACC 1990, American Association of Cereal Chemists, Minnesota. 8th ed.
15. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluite J., Templeton D., et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure 2006, http://devafdc.nrel.gov/pdfs/9572.pdf.
16. Heo N.H., Park S.C., Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 2004, A39(7):1739-1756.
17. Moller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004, 26(5):485-495.
18. Amon T., Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Zollitsch W., Mayer K., Gruber L. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure: influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2007, 118(1-4):173-182.
19. Neves L., Goncalo E., Oliveira R., Alves M.M. Influence of composition on the biomethanation potential of restaurant waste at mesophilic temperatures. Waste Management 2008, 28(6):965-972.
20. Siegert I., Banks C. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochemistry 2005, 40(11):3412-3418.
21. Kayhanian M.H.S. The impact of four design parameters on the performance of a high-solids anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste for fuel gas production. Environmental Technology 1994, 15(6):557-567.
22. Lee M.Y., Hidaka T., Hagiwara W., Tsuno H. Comparative performance and microbial diversity of hyperthermophilic and thermophilic co-digestion of kitchen garbage and excess sludge. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100(2):578-585.
23. Speece R.G. Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters 1996, Archae Press, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee.
24. Alvarez R., Liden G. Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renewable Energy 2008, 33(4):726-734.