Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 2255-2264

  Labatut, Rodrigo A ^a   Angenent, Largus T ^a   Scott, Norman R ^a  

^a Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biodegradability; Biomethane; BMP; Dairy manure

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; BIOMETHANE; BMP; CODIGESTION; DAIRY MANURE; DAIRY MANURES; HETEROGENEOUS CHARACTERISTIC; METHANE POTENTIAL; METHANE YIELD; ORGANIC SUBSTRATE; SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITY;

ASSAYS; BIODEGRADATION; CARBOHYDRATES; MANURES; METHANE; SUBSTRATES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

CARBOHYDRATE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; LIPID; METHANE; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOASSAY; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIODEGRADATION; CARBOHYDRATE; LIPID; MANURE; METHANE; SUBSTRATE;

AIR QUALITY CONTROL; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; BIODEGRADABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ENERGY YIELD; MANURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE DIGESTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAIRYING; MANURE; METHANE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGANIC CHEMICALS;

EID: 78650802094     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agler M.T., Garcia M.L., Lee E.L., Schlicher M., Angenent L.T. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion to increase the net energy balance of corn grain ethanol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:6723-6729.
2. American Public Health Association (APHA), 1995. Standard Methods for the Determination of Water and Waste Water, 19th ed., APHA, Washington, DC.
3. Amon B., Amon T., Boxberger J., Alt C. Emissions of NH3, N2O and CH4 from dairy cows housed in a farmyard manure tying stall (housing, manure storage, manure spreading). Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2001, 60:103-113.
4. Angelidaki I., Ahring B. Codigestion of olive oil mill wastewaters with manure, household waste or sewage sludge. Biodegradation 1997, 8:221-226.
5. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B.K. A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 63:363-372.
6. Appels L., Baeyens J., Degreve J., Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog. Energy Combust. 2008, 34:755-781.
7. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Newell R.B., Newland M. Modelling anaerobic degradation of complex wastewater. I: model development. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 75:67-74.
8. Chynoweth D.P., Turick C.E., Owens J.M., Jerger D.E., Peck M.W. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 5:95-111.
9. El-Mashad H.M., Zhang R. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4021-4028.
10. Fernández B., Porrier P., Chamy R. Effect of inoculum-substrate ratio on the start-up of solid waste anaerobic digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44:103-108.
11. Gooch, C.A., Pronto, J.L., 2009. Capitalizing on Energy Opportunities on New York dairy Farms. Participant Briefing Paper: Opportunity Analysis, Dairy Power New York Summit, Innovation Center for US Dairy.
12. Gunaseelan V. Regression models of ultimate methane yields of fruits and vegetable solid wastes, sorghum and napiergrass on chemical composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:1270-1277.
13. Gustafson G.M. Partitioning of nutrient and trace elements in feed among milk, faeces and urine by lactating dairy cows. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A - Anim. Sci. 2000, 50:111-120.
14. Hansen T.L., Schmidt J.E., Angelidaki I., Marca E., Jansen J.L., Mosbaek H., et al. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2004, 24:393-400.
15. Hashimoto A.G. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate from straw. Biol. Waste. 1989, 28:247-255.
16. Hoffmann R.A., Garcia M.L., Veskivar M., Karim K., Al-Dahhan M.H., Angenent L.T. Effect of shear on performance and microbial ecology of continuously stirred anaerobic digesters treating animal manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100:38-48.
17. IPCC, 1997. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual. IPCC Guidelines, 1997.
18. Kellogg, R.L., Lander, C.H., Moffitt, D.C., Gollehon, N. 2000. Manure Nutrients Relative to the Capacity of Cropland and Pastureland to Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the United States. (accessed 22.08.10). http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/pubs/manntr.html.
19. Kübler H., Hoppenheidt K., Hirsch P., Kottmair A., Nimmrichter R., Nordsieck H., et al. Full scale co-digestion of organic waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:195-202.
20. Lemus R., Brummer E., Moore K., Molstad N., Burras C., Barker M. Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23:433-442.
21. Loehr, R.C., Rohlich, G.A., 1962. A wet method for grease analysis. In: Proc. 17th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, pp. 215-232.
22. McCarty P.L. Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals, part I: chemistry and microbiology. Public Works 1964, 95:107-112.
23. McCarty P.L. Energetics of organic matter degradation. Water Pollution Microbiology 1972, 91-118. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. R. Mitchell (Ed.).
24. Mertens D.R. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85:1217-1240.
25. Mladenovska Z., Hartmann H., Kvist T., Sales-Cruz M., Gani R., Ahring B.K. Thermal pretreatment of the solid fraction of manure: impact on the biogas reactor performance and microbial community. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:59-67.
26. Moller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:485-495.
27. Möller J. Gravimetric determination of acid detergent fiber and lignin in feed: interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 2009, 92:74-90.
28. Nielsen H.B., Mladenovska Z., Westermann P., Ahring B.K. Comparison of two-stage thermophilic (68°C/55°C) anaerobic digestion with one-stage thermophilic (55°C) digestion of cattle manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 86:291-300.
29. Owen W.F., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B., Young L.Y., McCarty P.L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979, 13:485-492.
30. Rosch C., Skarka J., Stelzer V., Raab K. Energy production from grassland - assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33:689-700.
31. Symons G.E., Buswell A.M. The methane fermentation of carbohydrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1933, 55:2028-2036.
32. US Department of Agriculture, 2009. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 22. Nutrient Data Laboratory. (accessed 02.08.10). http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata.
33. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Draft Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008. (accessed 15.12.09). http://www.epa.gov.
34. Vedrenne F., Beline F., Dabert P., Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:146-155.