'A one-to-one thing is better than a thousand books': Views and understanding of older people with diabetes

Quality in Primary Care

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 157-163

  Woodcock, Hannah ^a   Gillam, Steve ^b  

^a ST CATHARINE S COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; General practice; Older people; Primary care; Quality; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS;

AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84881292178     PISSN: 14791072     EISSN: 14791064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Craig R and Mindell J. Health Survey for England 2006. Vol 1: cardiovascular disease and risk factor in adults. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care: Leeds, 2008.
2. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standard 3. Empowering people with diabetes. Department of Health: London, 2001.
3. DESMOND Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Diagnosed, www.desmond-project.org.uk (accessed 03/10/12).
4. Diabetes UK. 15 Healthcare Essentials, www.diabetes.org.uk/15-essentials (accessed 03/10/12).
5. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People: Standard 2. Person-centred care. Department of Health: London, 2001.
6. Worrall G and Knight J. Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes: retrospective cohort study of mortality and hospitalization. Canadian Family Physician 20ll; 57: e 16-20.
7. Dreiher J, Comaneshter DS, Rosenbluth Y, Battat E, Bitterman H and Cohen AD. The association between continuity of care in the community and health outcomes: a population-based study. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 2012;1:21.
8. Knight JC, Dowden JJ, Worrall GJ, Gadag VG and Murphy MM. Does higher continuity of family physician care reduce hospitalizations in elderly people with diabetes? Population Health Management 2009;12(2):1-6.
9. Prentice JC, Graeme Fincke B, Miller DR and Pizer SD. Primary care and health outcomes among older patients with diabetes. Health Services Research 2012;2012:46-67.
10. Jansen Y J F M, Foets M M E and de Bont AA. The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: a review. European Journal of Public Health 2010;20:220-6.
11. Ritholz M, Beverly E and Weinger K. Digging deeper: the role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Current Diabetes Reports 2011;11:494-502.
12. Tambo-Lizalde E, Carrasco-Gimeno JM, Mayoral-Blasco S, Rabanaque-Hemández MJ and Abad-Díez JM. Patient and health professional perceptions on the quality of care provided to diabetic patients. Revista de Calidad Asistencial 2012 doi:/10.1016/j.cali.2012.07.006 (accessed 03/11/12).
13. Smith SM, O'Leary M, Bury G et al. A qualitative investigation of the views and health beliefs of patients with type 2 diabetes following the introduction of a diabetes shared care service. Diabetes Medicine 2003;20:853-7.
14. Casey D, De Civita M and Dasgupta K. Understanding physical activity facilitators and barriers during and following a supervised exercise programme in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabetes Medicine 2010;27:79-84.
15. Wilson V. Evaluation of the care received by older people with diabetes. Nursing Older People 2012;2012:33-7.
16. Pope C, Ziebland S and Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320(7227):114-16.
17. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 2001;1:385-405.
18. Begum S and Por J. The impact of the NSF for Diabetes on patient empowerment. British Journal of Nursing 2010;2010:887-90.
19. Department of Health. Six Years On: delivering the Diabetes National Service Framework Department of Health: London, 2010. www.dh.gov. uk/publications (accessed 15/10/12).
20. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S and Sharpe N. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expectations 2007;2007:248-58.
21. Arora NK and McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Medical Care 2000;2000:335-41.
22. Yeung SE, Fischer AL and Dixon RA. Exploring effects of type 2 diabetes on cognitive functioning in older adults. Neuropsychology 2009;2009:1-9.
23. Ryan CM and Geckle M. Why is learning and memory dysfunction in type 2 diabetes limited to older adults? Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 2000;16:308-15.
24. Davies M J, Heller S, Skinner TC et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336(7642):491-5.
25. Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T et al. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e2333.
26. Department of Health, Diabetes UK. Structured Patient Education in Diabetes: Report from the Patient Education Working Group. Chapter 4.2: Ongoing Support. Department of Health: London, 2005.
27. Hannon K, Lester H and Campbell H. Patients' views of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice 2012;42; 244-5.
28. Carey N and Courtenay M. A review of the activity and effects of nurse-led care in diabetes. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16:296-304.
29. Harris D and Cracknell P. Improving diabetes care in general practice using a nurse-led, GP supported clinic: a cohort study. Practical Diabetes International 2005;22:295-301.