125 GeV Higgs boson and the type-II seesaw model

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Dev, P S Bhupal ^a   Ghosh, Dilip Kumar ^b   Okada, Nobuchika ^c   Saha, Ipsita ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876231686     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)150     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. -1 of data, arXiv:1207.0449 [ INSPIRE ].
4. ATLAS collaboration
5. CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045 (1494149).
6. ATLAS collaboration, Observation and study of the Higgs boson candidate in the two photon decay channel with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-168 (2012).
7. CMS collaboration, Evidence for a new state decaying into two photons in the search for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-015 (1460419).
8. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: the Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503172 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503173 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [ arXiv:1205.6497 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. J. Ellis, J. Espinosa, G. Giudice, A. Hoecker and A. Riotto, The probable fate of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 369 [ arXiv:0906.0954 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. M. Holthausen, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Planck scale boundary conditions and the Higgs mass, JHEP 02 (2012) 037 [ arXiv:1112.2415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [ arXiv:1112.3022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. F. Bezrukov, M.Y. Kalmykov, B.A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs boson mass and new physics, JHEP 10 (2012) 140 [ arXiv:1205.2893 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 214 [ arXiv:1207.0980 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. I. Masina, The Higgs boson and top quark masses as tests of electroweak vacuum stability, arXiv:1209.0393 [ INSPIRE ].
17. M. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Phenomenology with massive neutrinos, Phys. Rept. 460 (2008) 1 [ arXiv:0704.1800 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. R. Mohapatra and A. Smirnov, Neutrino mass and new physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56 (2006) 569 [ hep-ph/0603118 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [ INSPIRE ].
20. E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1171 [ hep-ph/9805219 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a rate of one out of 1 billion muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [ INSPIRE ].
22. T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, in the proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theories, KEK Report 79-18 (1979) 95.
23. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, in Supergravity, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D.Z. Freedman eds., North Holland, Amsterdam The Netherlands (1979) 315.
24. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [ INSPIRE ].
25. J. Schechter and J. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)× U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [ INSPIRE ].
26. J. Casas, V. Di Clemente, A. Ibarra and M. Quirós, Massive neutrinos and the Higgs mass window, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 053005 [ hep-ph/9904295 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. I. Gogoladze, N. Okada and Q. Shafi, Higgs boson mass bounds in the standard model with type III and type I seesaw, Phys. Lett. B 668 (2008) 121 [ arXiv:0805.2129 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. C.-S. Chen and Y. Tang, Vacuum stability, neutrinos and dark matter, JHEP 04 (2012) 019 [ arXiv:1202.5717 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang, Impact of massive neutrinos on the Higgs self-coupling and electroweak vacuum stability, JHEP 06 (2012) 022 [ arXiv:1203.3825 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. J. Chakrabortty, M. Das and S. Mohanty, Constraints on TeV scale Majorana neutrino phenomenology from the vacuum stability of the Higgs, arXiv:1207.2027 [ INSPIRE ].
31. ATLAS collaboration, Search for Majorana neutrino production in pp collisions at S=7 TeV indimuonfinalstateswiththeATLASdetector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-139 (2012).
32. -] events in pp collisions at S=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 109 [ arXiv:1207.6079 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 61 [ INSPIRE ].
34. T. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings and oscillations in SU(2)× U(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860 [ INSPIRE ].
35. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Proton lifetime and fermion masses in an SO(10) model, Nucl. Phys. B 181 (1981) 287 [ INSPIRE ].
36. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165 [ INSPIRE ].
37. I. Gogoladze, N. Okada and Q. Shafi, Higgs boson mass bounds in a type-II seesaw model with triplet scalars, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085005 [ arXiv:0802.3257 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab, G. Moultaka, M. Peyranere et al., The Higgs potential in the type II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095005 [ arXiv:1105.1925 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. C. Arina, J.-O. Gong and N. Sahu, Unifying darko-lepto-genesis with scalar triplet inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 865 (2012) 430 [ arXiv:1206.0009 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. E.J. Chun, H.M. Lee and P. Sharma, Vacuum stability, perturbativity, EWPD and Higgs-to-diphoton rate in type II seesaw models, JHEP 11 (2012) 106 [ arXiv:1209.1303 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. W. Chao, M. Gonderinger and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Higgs vacuum stability, neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113017 [ arXiv:1210.0491 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu, Radiative corrections to the Higgs boson couplings in the triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015012 [ arXiv:1211.6029 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. F. Arbabifar, S. Bahrami and M. Frank, Neutral Higgs bosons in the Higgs triplet model with nontrivial mixing, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015020 [ arXiv:1211.6797 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang, T. Li and K. Wang, Neutrino masses and the CERN LHC: testing type II seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 015018 [ arXiv:0805.3536 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. A. Melfo, M. Nemevšek, F. Nesti, G. Senjanović and Y. Zhang, Type II seesaw at LHC: the roadmap, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055018 [ arXiv:1108.4416 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. ATLAS collaboration, Search for doubly-charged Higgs bosons in like-sign dilepton final states at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2244 [ arXiv:1210.5070 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. CMS collaboration, Inclusive search for doubly charged Higgs in leptonic final states with the 2011 data at 7 TeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-005 (2012).
48. R. Foot, H. Lew, X. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [ INSPIRE ].
49. B. He, N. Okada and Q. Shafi, 125 GeV Higgs, type III seesaw and gauge-Higgs unification, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 197 [ arXiv:1205.4038 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. S. Khan, S. Goswami and S. Roy, Vacuum stability constraints on the minimal singlet TeV seesaw model, arXiv:1212.3694 [ INSPIRE ].
51. P. Nath, B.D. Nelson, H. Davoudiasl, B. Dutta, D. Feldman et al., The hunt for new physics at the large hadron collider, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 200-202 (2010) 185 [ arXiv:1001.2693 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. P. Dey, A. Kundu and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Some consequences of a Higgs triplet, J. Phys. G 36 (2009) 025002 [ arXiv:0802.2510 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. A. Akeroyd and C.-W. Chiang, Phenomenology of large mixing for the CP-even neutral scalars of the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 115007 [ arXiv:1003.3724 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. S. Kanemura and K. Yagyu, Radiative corrections to electroweak parameters in the Higgs triplet model and implication with the recent Higgs boson searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115009 [ arXiv:1201.6287 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu, Renormalization of the Higgs sector in the triplet model, Phys. Lett. B 714 (2012) 279 [ arXiv:1204.1951 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab, G. Moultaka and L. Rahili, Higgs boson decay into 2 photons in the type II seesaw model, JHEP 04 (2012) 136 [ arXiv:1112.5453 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. M. Carena, I. Low and C.E. Wagner, Implications of a modified Higgs to diphoton decay width, JHEP 08 (2012) 060 [ arXiv:1206.1082 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. A. Djouadi, V. Driesen, W. Hollik and A. Kraft, The Higgs photon - Z boson coupling revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 163 [ hep-ph/9701342 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. A. Akeroyd and S. Moretti, Enhancement of H to γγ from doubly charged scalars in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035015 [ arXiv:1206.0535 ] [ INSPIRE ].
60. W.-F. Chang, J.N. Ng and J.M. Wu, Constraints on new scalars from the LHC 125 GeV Higgs signal, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033003 [ arXiv:1206.5047 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. C.-W. Chiang and K. Yagyu, Testing the custodial symmetry in the Higgs sector of the Georgi-Machacek model, JHEP 01 (2013) 026 [ arXiv:1211.2658 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. E. Accomando, A. Akeroyd, E. Akhmetzyanova, J. Albert, A. Alves et al., Workshop on CP studies and non-standard Higgs physics, hep-ph/0608079 [ INSPIRE ].
63. A.G. Akeroyd, M. Aoki and H. Sugiyama, Phenomenology of the Higgs triplet model, in The Large Hadron Collider and Higgs boson research, C.J. Hong ed., Nova Publishers, New York U.S.A. (2012) 169.
64. M.A. Schmidt, Renormalization group evolution in the type-I+ II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073010 [Erratum ibid. D 85 (2012) 099903] [ arXiv:0705.3841 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
66. D. Forero, M. Tortola and J. Valle, Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 073012 [ arXiv:1205.4018 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 1. Wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 83 [ INSPIRE ].
68. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 2. Yukawa couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 221 [ INSPIRE ].
69. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 3. Scalar quartic couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [ INSPIRE ].
70. C. Ford, I. Jack and D. Jones, The standard model effective potential at two loops, Nucl. Phys. B 387 (1992) 373 [Erratum ibid. B 504 (1997) 551-552] [ hep-ph/0111190 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. H. Arason, D. Castano, B. Keszthelyi, S. Mikaelian, E. Piard et al., Renormalization group study of the standard model and its extensions. 1. The standard model, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3945 [ INSPIRE ].
72. M.-x. Luo and Y. Xiao, Two loop renormalization group equations in the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 011601 [ hep-ph/0207271 ] [ INSPIRE ].
73. H and the possible onset of new physics in the Higgs sector of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 389 [ INSPIRE ].
74. N. Gray, D.J. Broadhurst, W. Grafe and K. Schilcher, Three loop relation of quark (modified) MS and pole masses, Z. Phys. C 48 (1990) 673 [ INSPIRE ].
75. J. Fleischer, F. Jegerlehner, O. Tarasov and O. Veretin, Two loop QCD corrections of the massive fermion propagator, Nucl. Phys. B 539 (1999) 671 [Erratum ibid. B 571 (2000) 511-512] [ hep-ph/9803493 ] [ INSPIRE ].
76. K. Chetyrkin and M. Steinhauser, The relation between the MS-bar and the on-shell quark mass at order 3, Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 617 [ hep-ph/9911434 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. K. Melnikov and T.v. Ritbergen, The three loop relation between the MS-bar and the pole quark masses, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 99 [ hep-ph/9912391 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. R. Hempfling and B.A. Kniehl, On the relation between the fermion pole mass and MS Yukawa coupling in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1386 [ hep-ph/9408313 ] [ INSPIRE ].
79. s) correction to the pole mass of the t quark within the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 676 (2004) 365 [ hep-ph/0308216 ] [ INSPIRE ].
80. W. Chao and H. Zhang, One-loop renormalization group equations of the neutrino mass matrix in the triplet seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 033003 [ hep-ph/0611323 ] [ INSPIRE ].
81. A. Akeroyd, M. Aoki and H. Sugiyama, Lepton flavour violating decays to ll and μ → eγ in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 113010 [ arXiv:0904.3640 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. T. Fukuyama, H. Sugiyama and K. Tsumura, Constraints from muon g - 2 and LFV processes in the Higgs triplet model, JHEP 03 (2010) 044 [ arXiv:0909.4943 ] [ INSPIRE ].
83. + → τ ν in top quark pair events using pp collision data at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2012) 039 [ arXiv:1204.2760 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. ATLAS collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons through the violation of lepton universality in tt events using pp collision data at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, arXiv:1212.3572 [ INSPIRE ].
85. CMS collaboration, Search for a light charged Higgs boson in top quark decays in pp collisions at S=7 TeV, JHEP 07 (2012) 143 [ arXiv:1205.5736 ] [ INSPIRE ].
86. ATLAS collaboration, Combined search for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at S=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 032003 [ arXiv:1207.0319 ] [ INSPIRE ].
87. CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at S=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [ arXiv:1202.1488 ] [ INSPIRE ].
88. LEP Higgs Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons: preliminary combined results using LEP data collected at energies up to 209 GeV, hep-ex/0107031 [ INSPIRE ].
89. L. Lavoura and L.-F. Li, Making the small oblique parameters large, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1409 [ hep-ph/9309262 ] [ INSPIRE ].
90. E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Neutrino masses and leptogenesis with heavy Higgs triplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5716 [ hep-ph/9802445 ] [ INSPIRE ].
91. T. Hambye, Leptogenesis: beyond the minimal type-I seesaw scenario, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 125014 [ arXiv:1212.2888 ] [ INSPIRE ].
92. C.-S. Chen and C.-M. Lin, Type II seesaw Higgs triplet as the inflaton for chaotic inflation and leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 9 [ arXiv:1009.5727 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. S. Kanemura and H. Sugiyama, Dark matter and a suppression mechanism for neutrino masses in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 073006 [ arXiv:1202.5231 ] [ INSPIRE ].
94. L. Wang and X.-F. Han, 130 GeV gamma-ray line and enhancement of H → γγ in the Higgs triplet model plus a scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015015 [ arXiv:1209.0376 ] [ INSPIRE ].
95. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A phenomenological profile of the Higgs boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [ INSPIRE ].
96. M.A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, M. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-energy theorems for Higgs boson couplings to photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711 [ INSPIRE ].
97. J. Baglio, A. Djouadi and R. Godbole, The apparent excess in the Higgs to di-photon rate at the LHC: new physics or QCD uncertainties?, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 203 [ arXiv:1207.1451 ] [ INSPIRE ].
98. M. Spira, QCD effects in Higgs physics, Fortsch. Phys. 46 (1998) 203 [ hep-ph/9705337 ] [ INSPIRE ].
99. J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane and S. Dawson, The Higgs hunter's guide, Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1.
100. R. Cahn, M.S. Chanowitz and N. Fleishon, Higgs particle production by Z → Hγ, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 113 [ INSPIRE ].
101. - collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 137 [Erratum ibid. B 276 (1986) 744] [ INSPIRE ].
102. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables, arXiv:1101.0593 [ INSPIRE ].
103. CMS collaboration, Search for a light Higgs boson in the Z boson plus a photon decay channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-049 (2012).
104. B. Schrempp and M. Wimmer, Top quark and Higgs boson masses: interplay between infrared and ultraviolet physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 1 [ hep-ph/9606386 ] [ INSPIRE ].
105. CDF Collaboration, D0 collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Combination of the top-quark mass measurements from the Tevatron collider, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 092003 [ arXiv:1207.1069 ] [ INSPIRE ].
106. -1 of data, ATLAS-CONF-2012-095 (2012).