On negative retentions in organic solvent nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 447, Issue , 2013, Pages 57-65

  Postel, Stefanie ^a   Spalding, Gerd ^a   Chirnside, Morfula ^a   Wessling, Matthias ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Negative retention; Organic solvent nanofiltration; Solvent resistant nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

NEGATIVE RETENTION; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; PARTIAL MOLAR VOLUME; SOLUTE MOLECULES; SOLVENT RESISTANT NANOFILTRATION; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION; SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATIONS; TRANSPORT RATE;

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; NANOFILTRATION; PARAFFINS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYSTYRENES; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; SOLVENTS;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

2 PROPANOL; ALKANE; BEHENIC ACID; CARBOXYLIC ACID; DECANE; DODECANE; HEXADECANE; HEXANE; MACROGOL; METHANOL; MYRISTIC ACID; ORGANIC SOLVENT; POLYSTYRENE; STEARIC ACID; TETRADECANE; TOLUENE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; MEMBRANE FILTER; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84881250875     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365.
2. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
3. Zwijnenberg H.J., Dutczak S.M., Boerrigter M.E., Hempenius M.A., Luiten-Olieman M.W.J., Benes N.E., Wessling M., Stamatialis D. Important factors influencing molecular weight cut-off determination of membranes in organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390-391:211-217.
4. See Toh Y.H., Loh X.X., Li K., Bismarck A., Livingston A.G. In search of a standard method for the characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291:120-125.
5. Darvishmanesh S., Degrève J., Van der Bruggen B. Mechanisms of solute rejection in solvent resistant nanofiltration: the effect of solvent on solute rejection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:13333.
6. Geens J., Boussu K., Vandecasteele C., Van der Bruggen B. Modelling of solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:139-148.
7. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Non-aqueous nanofiltration: solute rejection in low-polarity binary systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:123-131.
8. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Ebert K., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Influence of cross-linking and process parameters on the separation performance of poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanofiltration membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:3238-3248.
9. Stafie N., Stamatialis D.F., Wessling M. Insight into the transport of hexane-solute systems through tailor-made composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228:103-116.
10. Peeva L.G., Gibbins E., Luthra S.S., White L.S., Stateva R.P., Livingston A.G. Effect of concentration polarisation and osmotic pressure on flux in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236:121-136.
11. Vankelecom I.F.J., De Smet K., Gevers L.E.M., Livingston A., Nair D., Aerts S., Kuypers S., Jacobs P.A. Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solvents through dense silicone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:99-108.
12. Braeken L., Ramaekers R., Zhang Y., Maes G., Bruggen B.V.d., Vandecasteele C. Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:195-203.
13. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A., Taylor M.L. The influence of polarity on flux and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration-experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:318-327.
14. Gevers L.E.M., Meyen G., De Smet K., Van De Velde P., Du Prez F., Vankelecom I.F.J., Jacobs P.A. Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solutes through dense silicone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 274:173-182.
15. Stamatialis D.F., Stafie N., Buadu K., Hempenius M., Wessling M. Observations on the permeation performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:424-433.
16. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Tagami M. Phenol transport in cellulose acetate membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1967, 11:1807-1820.
17. Matsuura T., Sourirajan S. Reverse osmosis separation of phenols in aqueous solutions using porous cellulose acetate membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1972, 16:2531-2554.
18. Burghoff H.G., Lee K.L., Pusch W. Characterization of transport across cellulose acetate membranes in the presence of strong solute-membrane interactions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1980, 25:323-347.
19. Koops G.H., Yamada S., Nakao S.I. Separation of linear hydrocarbons and carboxylic acids from ethanol and hexane solutions by reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:241-254.
20. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Bhattacharyya D. Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:343-359.
21. Zeidler S., Kätzel U., Kreis P. Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a PDMS membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2012.
22. Tsarkov S., Khotimskiy V., Budd P.M., Volkov V., Kukushkina J., Volkov A. Solvent nanofiltration through high permeability glassy polymers: effect of polymer and solute nature. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423-424:65-72.
23. Hansen C.M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. 2nd ed.
24. Ogieglo W., van der Werf H., Tempelman K., Wormeester H., Wessling M., Nijmeijer A., Benes N.E. n-Hexane induced swelling of thin PDMS films under non-equilibrium nanofiltration permeation conditions, resolved by spectroscopic ellipsometry. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 437:313-323.
25. Smallwood I.M. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties 1996, Arnold.
26. Barton A.F.M. CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters 1983, CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.
27. Miyagi A., Nabetani H., Nakajima M. Analysis of transport mechanism of binary organic solvent system through a PDMS-based dense membrane using a regular solution model combined with a solution-diffusion model. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 88:216-226.
28. Sakellariou P., Rowe R.C., White E.F.T. The solubility parameters of some cellulose derivatives and polyethylene glycols used in tablet film coating. Int. J. Pharm. 1986, 31:175-177.
29. R. Haensel, H. Doehler, P. Schwab, P. Seidensticker, M. Ferenz, G. Baumgarten, M. Lazar, M. Ungerank, Composite Silcone Membranes with High Separating Actions, 2011 EP2010/066604.
30. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
31. Wijmans J. The role of permeant molar volume in the solution-diffusion model transport equations. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 237:39-50.