Important factors influencing molecular weight cut-off determination of membranes in organic solvents

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 390-391, Issue , 2012, Pages 211-217

  Zwijnenberg, H J ^a,c   Dutczak, S M ^a   Boerrigter, M E ^a   Hempenius, M A ^a   Luiten Olieman, M W J ^a   Benes, N E ^a   Wessling, M ^a   Stamatialis, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Flow induced polymer deformation; MWCO characterization; Polyisobutylene; Polystyrene; Solvent resistant nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

APPLIED PRESSURE; COMBINED EFFECT; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DENSE MEMBRANE; HIGH FLUX; LOW FLUX; MEMBRANE PROPERTIES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; N-HEXANE; NONLINEAR RELATIONS; POLYISOBUTYLENES; POLYMER DEFORMATION; POROUS MEMBRANES; PROCESS CONDITION; SOLVENT RESISTANT NANOFILTRATION; SUITABILITY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORT MECHANISM;

DEFORMATION; HEXANE; MEMBRANES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; POLYSTYRENES; SHEAR FLOW; SILICONES; SOLVENTS; TOLUENE; ZIRCONIA;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

DIMETICONE; HEXANE; ORGANIC SOLVENT; POLYSTYRENE; TOLUENE; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SOLUTE;

EID: 84855263032     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.039     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. See Toh Y.H., Lim F.W., Livingston A.G. Polymeric membranes for nanofiltration in polar aprotic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 301:3-10.
2. Vanherck K., Vandezande P., Aldea S.O., Vankelecom I.F.J. Cross-linked polyimide membranes for solvent resistant nanofiltration in aprotic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:468-476.
3. White L.S., Wildemuth C.R. Aromatics enrichment in refinery streams using hyperfiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:9136-9143.
4. Sheth J.P., Qin Y., Sirkar K.K., Baltzis B.C. Nanofiltration-based diafiltration process for solvent exchange in pharmaceutical manufacturing. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:251-261.
5. Scarpello J.T., Nair D., Freitas dos Santos L.M., White L.S., Livingston A.G. The separation of homogeneous organometallic catalysts using solvent resistant nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:71-85.
6. Livingston A., Peeva L., Han S., Nair D., Luthra S.S., White L.S., Freitas Dos Santos L.M. Membrane separation in green chemical processing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 984:123-141.
7. Luthra S.S., Yang X., Freitas dos Santos L.M., White L.S., Livingston A.G. Homogeneous phase transfer catalyst recovery and re-use using solvent resistant membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 201:65-75.
8. Kale V., Katikaneni S.P.R., Cheryan M. Deacidifying rice bran oil by solvent extraction and membrane technology. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76:723-727.
9. Zwijnenberg H.J., Krosse A.M., Ebert K., Peinemann K.V., Cuperus F.P. Acetone-stable nanofiltration membranes in deacidifying vegetable oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76:83-87.
10. Lin J.C.T., Livingston A.G. Nanofiltration membrane cascade for continuous solvent exchange. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:2728-2736.
11. Shi D., Kong Y., Yu J., Wang Y., Yang J. Separation performance of polyimide nanofiltration membranes for concentrating spiramycin extract. Desalination 2006, 191:309-317.
12. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
13. Whu J.A., Baltzis B.C., Sirkar K.K. Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:159-172.
14. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Bhattacharyya D. Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:343-359.
15. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., Bhattacharyya D. Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modelling. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:1-21.
16. Stafie N., Stamatialis D.F., Wessling M. Insight into the transport of hexane-solute systems through tailor-made composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228:103-116.
17. Stafie N., Stamatialis D.F., Wessling M. Effect of PDMS cross-linking degree on the permeation performance of PAN/PDMS composite nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 45:220-231.
18. Stamatialis D.F., Stafie N., Buadu K., Hempenius M., Wessling M. Observations on the permeation performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:424-433.
19. Volkov A.V., Stamatialis D.F., Khotimsky V.S., Volkov V.V., Wessling M., Plate N.A. Poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] as a solvent resistance nanofiltration membrane material. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:351-357.
20. Darvishmanesh S., Degrève J., Van Der Bruggen B. Mechanisms of solute rejection in solvent resistant nanofiltration: the effect of solvent on solute rejection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:13333-13342.
21. Voigt P.P.I., Holborn T., Dudziak G., Mutter M., Nickel A. Ceramic nanofiltration membranes for applications in organic solvents. 9th Aachen Membrane Colloquium 2003, pp. OP 20-21-OP 20-11.
22. Zwijnenberg H.J. A standardized characterization method for solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane modules. International Congress on Membranes 2005 2005, Fr12B-3I-481.
23. See Toh Y.H., Loh X.X., Li K., Bismarck A., Livingston A.G. In search of a standard method for the characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291:120-125.
24. Dutczak S.M., Luiten-Olieman M.W.J., Zwijnenberg H.J., Bolhuis-Versteeg L.A.M., Winnubst L., Hempenius M.A., Benes N.E., Wessling M., Stamatialis D. Composite capillary membrane for solvent resistant nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:182-190.
25. Beerlage M.A.M., Heijnen M.L., Mulder M.H.V., Smolders C.A., Strathmann H. Non-aqueous retention measurements: ultrafiltration behaviour of polystyrene solutions and colloidal silver particles. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 113:259-273.
26. N. Stafie, Poly(dimethyl siloxane)-based composite nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous applications, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2004.
27. Sokolov A.P., Novikov V.N., Ding Y. Why many polymers are so fragile. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2007, 19. 205116/1-205116/8.
28. De Jong J., Benes N.E., Koops G.H., Wessling M. Towards single step production of multi-layer inorganic hollow fibers. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239:265-269.
29. Elias H.-G. An Introduction to Plastics 2003, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
30. Mark J.E. Polymer Data Handbook 1999, Oxford University Press, Inc., Oxford.
31. Abe F., Einaga Y., Yamakawa H. Intrinsic viscosity of oligo- and polyisobutylenes: treatments of negative intrinsic viscosities. Macromolecules 1991, 24:4423-4428.
32. Yamada M., Osa M., Yoshizaki T., Yamakawa H. Excluded-volume effects on the mean-square radius of gyration of oligo- and polyisobutylenes in dilute solution. Macromolecules 1997, 30:7166-7170.
33. Abe F., Einaga Y., Yoshizaki T., Yamakawa H. Excluded-volume effects on the mean-square radius of gyration of oligo- and polystyrenes in dilute solutions. Macromolecules 1993, 26:1884-1890.
34. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Ebert K., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Influence of cross-linking and process parameters on the separation performance of poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanofiltration membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:3238-3248.
35. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Non-aqueous nanofiltration: solute rejection in low-polarity binary systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:123-131.
36. Baker R. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2nd ed.
37. Teraoka I. Polymer solutions in confining geometries. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1996, 21:89-149.