Nuclear power before and after Fukushima: The relations between acceptance, ambivalence and knowledge

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 77-86

  Visschers, Vivianne H M ^a   Wallquist, Lasse ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Risk Dialogue Foundation   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Fukushima; Knowledge; Longitudinal survey; Nuclear power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881243051     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Biel A., Dahlstrand U. Risk perception and the location of a repository for spent nuclear fuel. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1995, 36:25-36.
2. Bolsen T., Cook F.L. Public opinion on energy policy: 1974-2006. Public Opinion Quarterly 2008, 72:364-388.
3. Conner M., Sparks P. Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology 2002, 12:37-70.
4. Costa-Font J., Rudisill C., Mossialos E. Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": The case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1273-1287.
5. Cousin M.-E., Siegrist M. The public's knowledge of mobile communication and its influence on base station sitting preferences. Health, Risk & Society 2010, 12:231-250.
6. Cousin M.-E., Siegrist M. Cell phones and health concerns: Impact of knowledge and voluntary precautionary recommendations. Risk Analysis 2011, 31:301-311.
7. Davidson R.J., Freudenburg W.R. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior 1996, 28:302-339.
8. Dickson-Spillmann M., Siegrist M., Keller C. Development and validation of a short, consumer-oriented nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Appetite 2011, 56:617-620.
9. Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M., Sjöberg L. Adolescents' attitudes to nuclear power and radioactive wastes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1991, 21:2007-2036.
10. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes 1993, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
11. Eiser J.R., Spears R., Webley P. Nuclear attitudes before and after Chernobyl: Change and judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1989, 19:689-700.
12. Energy technologies: Knowledge, perception, measures 2007, European Commission, Special Eurobarometer 262/Wave 65.3), TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels.
13. Europeans and nuclear safety 2007, European Commission, (Special Eurobarometer 271/Wave 66.2), TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels.
14. Attitudes towards radioactive waste 2008, European Commission, (Special Eurobarometer 297/Wave 69.1), TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels.
15. Europeans and nuclear safety 2010, European Commission, (Special Eurobarometer 324/Wave 72.2), TNS Opinion & Social, Brussels.
16. Evans G., Durant J. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 1995, 4:57-74.
17. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
18. Hanze M. Ambivalence, conflict, and decision making: Attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO's military intervention in the Kosovo war. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 31:693-706.
19. Nuclear update December 2011: Update on GB attitudes to nuclear energy 2012, Ipsos MORI, Retrieved May 15, 2012, from:. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/2903/Nuclear-Energy-Update-Poll.aspx.
20. Johnson B.B. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk perception. Risk 1993, 4:189-212.
21. Katsuya T. Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident. Risk Analysis 2001, 21:1039-1046.
22. Keller C., Visschers V., Siegrist M. Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants. Risk Analysis 2012, 32:464-477.
23. Kruger J., Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1121-1134.
24. Kuklinski J.H., Metlay D.S., Kay W.D. Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy. American Journal of Political Science 1982, 26:615-642.
25. Lindell M.K., Perry R.W. Effects of the Chernobyl accident on public perceptions of nuclear plant accident risks. Risk Analysis 1990, 10:393-399.
26. Maharik M., Fischhoff B. Risk knowledge and risk attitudes regarding nuclear energy sources in space. Risk Analysis 1993, 13:345-353.
27. Midden C.J.H., Verplanken B. The stability of nuclear attitudes after Chernobyl. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1990, 10:111-119.
28. Public attitude to nuclear power 2010 2010, OECD, Retrieved May 6, 2012, from:. http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6859-public-attitudes.pdf.
29. Pidgeon N.F., Lorenzoni I., Poortinga W. Climate change or nuclear power No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18:69-85.
30. van der Pligt J., de Vries N.K., Manstead A.S.R., van Harreveld F. The importance of being selective: Weighing the role of attribute importance in attitudinal judgment. Advances in experimental social psychology 2000, Vol. 32:135-200. Academic Press.
31. Rosa E.A., Dunlap R.E. Nuclear power: Three decades of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 1994, 58:295-324.
32. Siegrist M., Visschers V.H.M. Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect. Energy Policy 2013, 59:112-119.
33. Sjöberg L., Drottz-Sjöberg B.-M. Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Analysis 1991, 11:607-618.
34. Solomon L.S., Tomaskovic-Devey D., Risman B.J. The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment. Sex Roles 1989, 21:401-414.
35. Bevölkerungsstand und -struktur 2009, Swiss Statistics, Retrieved May 31, 2011, from:. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/01/02/blank/data/01.html.
36. Bildungsstand der Wohnbevölkerung nach Alter und Geschlecht 2010, Swiss Statistics, Retrieved May 31, 2011, from:. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/15/02/key/ind5.indicator.51131.511.html?open=9#9.
37. Thompson M.M., Zanna M.P., Griffin D.W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences 1995, 361-386. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.E. Petty, J.A. Krosnick (Eds.).
38. Verplanken B. Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions toward nuclear energy before and after Chernobyl in a longitudinal within-subjects design. Environment and Behavior 1989, 21:371-392.
39. Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M. How an accident in a nuclear power plant influences acceptance: Results of a longitudinal study before and after Fukushima. Risk Analysis 2013, 33:333-347.
40. Visschers V.H.M., Keller C., Siegrist M. Climate change benefits andenergy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear powerstations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3621-3629.
41. Wallquist L., Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M. Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44:6557-6562.
42. Impact of Japan earthquake on views about nuclear energy: Findings from a global snap poll in 47 countries (March 21-April 10, 2011) 2011, WIN-Gallup International, Retrieved June 30, 2011, from:. http://www.gallup.com.pk/JapanSurvey2011/Volume%25203%2520_Japan%2520Survey_.pdf.
43. Wynne B. Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors?. Public Understanding of Science 1992, 1:37-43.
44. Zingg A., Siegrist M. Measuring people's knowledge about vaccination: Developing a one-dimensional scale. Vaccine 2012, 30:3771-3777.