Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 535-546

  Chandra Chatterjee, Nikhil ^a   Bose, Goutam Kumar ^a  

^a HALDIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

ARAS F; COPRAS F; Fuzzy set theory; MCDM; Vendor selection; Wind Farm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881193775     PISSN: 19232926     EISSN: 19232934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bakshi, T., & Sarkar, B. (2011). MCA based performance evaluation of project selection, International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 2(2), 14-22.
2. Bayazit, O. (2006). Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(5), 566-579.
3. Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple criteria assessment of elite security personal on the basis of ARAS and expert methods. Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 4, 65-88.
4. Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S.S. (2010). Comparative study on application of utility concept and VIKOR method for vendor selection. AIMS International Conference on Value-based Management August 11-13, 614-622.
5. Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. (2012). Applications of MOORA method in vendor selection under supply chain environment, Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and its Interdisciplinary Areas (ICAMEI-2012).
6. Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. (2012). A MOORA based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for supply chain strategy selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(4), 649-662.
7. Chatterjee, P., Mukherjee, P., & Chakraborty, S., (2011). Supplier selection using Compromise Ranking and Outranking Methods. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 7(14), 61-73.
8. Demirtas, E.A., & Üstün, O. (2008), An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation, Omega, 36, 76-90.
9. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9, 613-626.
10. Haldar, A., Ray, A., Banerjee, D., & Ghosh, S., (2012), A hybrid MCDM model for resilient supplier selection, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 7(4), 284-292.
11. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag
12. Jayaswal, P., Trivedi, M.K., & Kumar, L. (2012), Vendor selection methodology based on multi criteria decision making. International Journal of Interscience Management Review, 2(2), 40-45.
13. Khaled, A.A., Paul, S.K., Chakraborty, R.K., & Ayuby, Md. S. (2011), Selection of suppliers through different multi-criteria decision making techniques, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(4)1, 1-12.
14. Kim, D.Y., & Wagner, S.M. (2012). Supplier selection problem revisited from the perspective of product configuration. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2864-2876.
15. Keufmann, A., & Gupta, M.M. (1991). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Application, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
16. Lee, H.-L. (2012). Applying fuzzy and grey theory to multi-criteria decision-making model for supplier selection: A corporate social responsibility perspective, African Journal of Business Management, 6 (29), 8504-8514.
17. Lin, C.-T., Chen, B.-C., & Ting, Y.-C. (2011). An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1760-1765.
18. Mirahmadi, N., & Teimoury, E. (2012). A fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection and evaluation: Case of EMERSUN company. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(5), 5272-5287.
19. Podvezko, V. (2011). The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134-146.
20. Sadig, A.S., Fallah H., Chaharsooghi, S.K., Eskandari, H.R., & Jolai, F. (2011). An integrated method for supplier selection in a multi-product and quantity discount environment. Journal of American Science, 7(10), 553-560.
21. Shahanaghi, K., & Yazdian, S.A. (2009), Vendor selection using a new fuzzy group TOPSIS approach. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3(3), 221-231.
22. Sharma, H.K. (2012). A fuzzy logic multi-criteria decision approach for vendor selection manufacturing system. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 2(6), 4189-4194.
23. Shyur, H.J., & Shih, H.S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44 (8), 749-761.
24. Singh, A.P. (2012). Supplier selection using MCDM method in TV manufacturing organization. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 12(1), 1-9.
25. Sim, H.K., Omar, Md. K., Chee, W.C., & Gan, N. T. (2010). A survey on supplier selection criteria in the manufacturing industry in Malaysia. The 11th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference, Melaka, 7 - 10 December 2010.
26. Soeini, R.A., Tashakor, L., Bafghi, J.T., Mokhtari, M., & Vakili, A. (2012). Supplier selection based on multiple criteria. International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications, 2(1), 258-273.
27. Tahriri, F., Osman, Md. R., Ali, A., & Yusuff, R. Md., (2008), A Review of Supplier Selection Methods in Manufacturing Industries, Suranaree Journal of Science & Technology, 15(3),201-208.
28. Ting, S.-C. (2004). A multi-objective approach to supplier selection and purchasing decision in the supply chain, MCDM 2004, Whistler, B. C. Canada.
29. Trewatha, R.L., &Newport, M.G. (1982). Management. 3rd ed., Business Publications, 1982
30. Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Nieto Sanchez, S., & Ray, T. (1998). Multi-criteria decision making: An operations research approach. Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 15, 175-186.
31. Tsai, C.-H., Chang, C.-L., & Chen, L. (2003). Applying grey relational analysis to the vendor evaluation model. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, 11(3), 45-53.
32. Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010a). A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: Grey additive ratio assessment (ARAS-G) Method, Informatica, 21(4), 597-610.
33. Turskis, Z. & Zavadskas, E.K. (2010b). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case Study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport, 25(4), 423-432.
34. Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K., & Kutut, V. (2013). A model based on ARAS-G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 12(1), 45-73.
35. Vahdani, B., Alem-Tabriz, A., & Zandieh, M. (2009). Vendor selection: An enhanced hybrid fuzzy MCDM model. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, 231-239.
36. Yang, J.L., Chiu, H.N., Tzeng, G.-H., & Yeh, R.H. (2008). Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships. Information Sciences, 178, 4166-4183.
37. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
38. Zagorskas, J., Burinskiene, M., Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2007). Urbanistic assessment of city compactness on the basis of GIS applying the COPRAS method. Ekologija. 53. 55-63.
39. Zavadskas, E.K. & Turskis, Z. (2008). A new logarithmic normalization method in games theory. Informatica, 19(2), 303-314.
40. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z., (2010), A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2),159-172.
41. Zavadskas, E.K., & Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment, in Langford, D. A., Retik, A. (Eds.), International Symposium for "The Organisation and Management of Construction". Shaping Theory and Practice. 94-104.