The importance of still teaching the iGeneration: New technologies and the centrality of pedagogy

Harvard Educational Review

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 300-319

  Philip, Thomas M ^a   Garcia, Antero D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881169342     PISSN: 00178055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17763/haer.83.2.w221368g1554u158     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147-184.
2. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. (Pubitemid 44561602)
3. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The "digital natives" debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
4. Bernard, S. (2008). Zero-thumb game: How to tame texting. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/text-messaging-teaching-tool
5. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18-27.
7. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Cuban, L. (2012, March 10). Answering the big question on new technology in schools: Does it work? (Part 1). Retrieved from http://larrycuban.wordpress. com/2012/03/10/answering-the-big-question-on-new-technology-in-schools-does-it- work-part-1/
10. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
11. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
13. Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.
14. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
15. Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. E. (2011). A typology of young people's Internet use: Implications for education. Computers and Education, 56(3), 585-595.
16. Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the "cyberkid": Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4(4), 451-469.
17. Feenberg, A. (1991) Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
19. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Garcia, A. (2012). Good reception: Utilizing mobile media and games to develop critical inner-city agents of social change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
21. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
22. Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York: Continuum.
23. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-68.
24. Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 25-46). London: Routledge.
25. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602-621.
26. Hartmann, M. (2003). The Web generation? The (de)construction of users, morals and consumption. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/ reports/h2003-emtel.pdf
27. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. (Pubitemid 43841450)
28. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next greatest generation. New York: Vintage Books.
29. Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
30. Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
31. Kolb, L. (2008). Toys to tools: Connecting student cell phones to education. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
32. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
33. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
34. Lankshear, C., & Knoebel, M. (2004, April 14). From flogging to blogging via WiFi: Designing pedagogy for i-Mode and smart mobs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
35. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and mobile phones over the past five years: Pew Internet looks back. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/14-Teens-and-Mobile-Phones- Data-Memo.aspx
36. Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones and texting. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/ Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones/Summary-of-findings.aspx
37. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet. org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx
38. Lippman, L., Burns, S., & McArthur, E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
39. Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L. H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154-169.
40. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the Net: A survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
42. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1998). Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html
43. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.digitaldivide.gov
44. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
46. Postman, N. (1990, October 11). Informing ourselves to death. Paper presented at the German Informatics Society (Gesellschaft fuer Informatik), Stuttgart, Germany. Retrieved from: http://w2.eff.org/Net-culture/Criticisms/ informing-ourselves-to-death.paper
47. Prensky, M. (2006). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8-13. (Pubitemid 43017261)
48. Pugh, K. J. (2011). Transformative experience: An integrative construct in the spirit of Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 107-121.
49. Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50. Rothstein, R. (1993). The myth of public school failure. The American Prospect, 13(Spring), 20-34.
51. Scherer, M. (2012). The teacher-proof myth. Educational Leadership, 69(5), 7.
52. Selwyn, N. (2006). Exploring the "digital disconnect" between Net savvy students and their schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), 5-17. (Pubitemid 43553827)
53. Shor, I. (1987). Critical teaching and everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Skinner, B. F. (1961). Why we need teaching machines. Harvard Educational Review, 31(4), 377-398.
55. Snider, B. (2008). Learn2luvcell: A powerful multipurpose mechanism for learning. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/cell-phones- classroom-education
56. So, H. J., Seow, P., & Looi, C. K. (2009). Location matters: Leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2.0 technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 367-382.
57. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
58. Valencia, R., & Solórzano, D. (1997). Contemporary deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 160-210). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
59. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
60. van den Beemt, A., Akkerman, S., & Simons, P. R. J. (2011). Patterns of interactive media use among contemporary youth. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 103-118.
61. Wade, S. E. (2001). Research on importance and interest: Implications for curriculum development and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 243-261. (Pubitemid 33634683)
62. Watson, D. (2011). What do you mean when you say urban? Rethinking Schools, 26(1), 48-50.
63. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. (Pubitemid 40472875)
65. Young, J. (2012). A tech-happy professor reboots after hearing his teaching advice isn't working. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/A-Tech-Happy-Professor-Reboots/130741/