FMRI as a molecular imaging procedure for the functional reorganization of motor systems in chronic stroke

Molecular Medicine Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 775-779

  Lazaridou, Asimina ^a   Astrakas, Loukas ^a   Mintzopoulos, Dionyssios ^a   Khanchiceh, Azadeh ^a   Singhal, Aneesh ^b   Moskowitz, Michael ^a   Rosen, Bruce ^a   Tzika, Aria ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Dynamical causal modeling; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; ROBOTICS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA;

BRAIN; CEREBELLUM; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; STROKE;

EID: 84881134220     PISSN: 17912997     EISSN: 17913004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1603     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Hall MJ, Levant S and DeFrances CJ: Hospitalization for stroke in U.S. hospitals, 1989-2009. NCHS Data Brief: 1-8, 2012.
2. Evers SM, Ament AJ and Blaauw G: Economic evaluation in stroke research: a systematic review. Stroke 31: 1046-1053, 2000.
3. Payne KA, Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ, Craig Green TJ and Klittich WS: Long term cost-of-illness in stroke: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics 20: 813-825, 2002.
4. Astrakas LG, Naqvi SH, Kateb B and Tzika AA: Functional MRI using robotic MRI compatible devices for monitoring rehabilitation from chronic stroke in the molecular medicine era (Review). Int J Mol Med 29: 963-973, 2012.
5. Twitchell TE: Variations and abnormalities of motor development. Phys Ther 45: 424-430, 1965.
6. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, et al: Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 63: 236-246, 2008.
7. Wang LE, Tittgemeyer M, Imperati D, et al: Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function after stroke: a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 33: 2941-2956 2011.
8. Mintzopoulos D, Astrakas LG, Khanicheh A, et al: Connectivity alterations assessed by combining fMRI and MR-compatible hand robots in chronic stroke. Neuroimage 47 (Suppl 2): T90-T97, 2009.
9. Murphy TH and Corbett D: Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 861-872, 2009.
10. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ and Frackowiak RS: The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 29: 63-71, 1991.
11. Weiller C: Imaging recovery from stroke. Exp Brain Res 123: 13-17, 1998 (In German).
12. Cramer SC: Stroke recovery. Lessons from functional MR imaging and other methods of human brain mapping. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 10: 875-886, 1999.
13. Cramer SC: Brain repair after stroke. N Engl J Med 362: 1827-1829, 2010.
14. Seitz RJ: Stroke recovery: the pyramid in focus. Neurology 74: 276-277, 2010.
15. Ogawa S and Lee TM: Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: in vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation. Magn Reson Med 16: 9-18, 1990.
16. Amaro E Jr and Barker GJ: Study design in fMRI: basic principles. Brain Cogn 60: 220-232, 2006.
17. Smith SM: The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage 62: 1257-1266, 2012.
18. Brodal A: Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 96: 675-694, 1973.
19. Smith PS, Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Johnson M and Walker-Batson D: Effects of repetitive electrical stimulation to treat sensory loss in persons poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90: 2108-2111, 2009.
20. Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, et al: Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain 134: 1373-1386, 2011.
21. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F and Volpe BT: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 54: 443-446, 1997.
22. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OL, Diels C and Aisen M: A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54: 1938-1944, 2000.
23. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM and Aisen ML: Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology 53: 1874-1876, 1999.
24. Volpe BT, Krebs HI and Hogan N: Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 14: 745-752, 2001.
25. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, et al: Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 5: 465-470, 2005.
26. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI and Hogan N: Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep 4: 270-276, 2002.
27. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N and Volpe BT: Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 61: 1604-1607, 2003.
28. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R and Hogan N: Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 1106-1111, 2004.
29. Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, et al: Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 42: 723-736, 2005.
30. Macclellan LR, Bradham DD, Whitall J, et al: Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev 42: 717-722, 2005.
31. Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, et al: Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev 42: 683-692, 2005.
32. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ and Ijzerman MJ: Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43: 171-184, 2006.
33. Khanicheh A, Mintzopoulos D, Weinberg B, Tzika AA and Mavroidis C: MR-CHIROD v.2: magnetic resonance compatible smart hand rehabilitation device for brain imaging. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16: 91-98, 2008.
34. Tsekos N, Khanicheh A, Christoforou E and Mavroidis C: Magnetic resonance-compatible robotic and mechatronics systems for image-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review study. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9: 351-387, 2007.
35. Siekierka EM, Eng K, Bassetti C, et al: New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener Dis 4: 57-69, 2007.
36. Mintzopoulos D, Khanicheh A, Konstas A, et al: Functional MRI of rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients using novel MR-compatible hand robots. Open Neuroimag J 2: 94-101, 2008.
37. Cramer SC, Weisskoff RM, Schaechter JD, et al: Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum Brain Mapp 16: 197-205, 2002.
38. Yu H, Sternad D, Corcos DM and Vaillancourt DE: Role of hyperactive cerebellum and motor cortex in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 35: 222-233, 2007.
39. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ and Krebs HI: Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22: 111-121, 2008.
40. Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J and Pohl M: Electromechanical-assisted gait training with physiotherapy may improve walking after stroke. Stroke: Apr 3 2008 (Epub ahead of print).
41. Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK: Can physiotherapy after stroke based on the Bobath concept result in improved quality of movement compared to the motor relearning programme. Physiotherapy research international. Physiother Res Int 16: 69-80, 2011.
42. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK and Lindmark B: An evaluation of two different exercise regimes during the first year following stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract 25: 55-68, 2009.
43. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE and Jenkins W: Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 79: 2119-2148, 1998.
44. Aizawa H, Inase M, Mushiake H, Shima K and Tanji J: Reorganization of activity in the supplementary motor area associated with motor learning and functional recovery. Exp Brain Res 84: 668-671, 1991.
45. Jones TA and Schallert T: Overgrowth and pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical damage. Brain Res 581: 156-160, 1992.
46. Boyd LA, Edwards JD, Siengsukon CS, Vidoni ED, Wessel BD and Linsdell MA: Motor sequence chunking is impaired by basal ganglia stroke. Neurobiol Learn Mem 92: 35-44, 2009.
47. Ward NS: Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J 81: 510-514, 2005.
48. Hummel F and Cohen LG: Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19: 14-19, 2005.