A Feature-Sampling Account of the Time Course of Old-New Recognition Judgments

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 77-102

  Brockdorff, Noellie ^a   Lamberts, Koen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0033629999     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.77     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-612). New York: Academic Press.
3. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243-293). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
4. Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10, 385-395.
5. Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
6. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
7. Dosher, B. A. (1984a). Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 541-574.
8. Dosher, B. A. (1984b). Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 519-555.
9. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1991). Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 125-160.
10. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (1995). Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1075-1095.
12. Freeman, R. P. J., & Lamberts, K. (1999). Feature salience and the time course of perceptual categorization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.
14. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
15. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
16. Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 846-858.
17. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96-101.
18. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
19. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
20. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667-680.
21. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
22. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23. Lamberts, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161-180.
24. Lamberts, K. (1998). The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 695-711.
25. Lamberts, K. (in press). Information accumulation theory of categorization response times. Psychological Review.
26. Lamberts, K., & Brockdorff, N. (1997). Fast categorization of stimuli with multi-valued dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 25, 296-304.
27. Lamberts, K., & Freeman, R. P. J. (1999). Building object representations from parts: Tests of a stochastic sampling model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 904-926.
28. Maddox, W. T., & Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 539-559.
29. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
30. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
31. Meyer, D. E., Irwin, D. E., Osman, A. M., & Kounios, J. (1988). The dynamics of cognition: Mental processes inferred from a speed-accuracy decomposition technique. Psychological Review, 95, 183-237.
32. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
33. Murdock, B. B. (1983). A distributed memory model for serial-order information. Psychological Review, 90, 316-338.
34. Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 79-95.
35. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
36. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988a). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
37. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988b). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54-65.
38. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
39. Olson, G. M. (1969). Learning and retention in a continuous recognition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 381-384.
40. Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
41. Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285-308.
42. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
43. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the processing of false statements about semantic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 8, 16-36.
44. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1989): Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 139-155.
45. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
46. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-374.
47. Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574-576.
48. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 432-453.
49. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
50. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 516-534.