Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 861-871

  Wyble, Brad ^a   Folk, Charles ^b   Potter, Mary C ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Conceptual information; Contingent capture; Natural images

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881103578     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030517     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496. doi:10.3758/ BF03205306
2. Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2010). The role of relational information in contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1460-1476. doi: 10.1037/a0020370
3. Bowman, H., & Wyble, B. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological Review, 114, 38-70. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.38
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
5. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M., (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology. 22. 225-271. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90017-X
6. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109
7. Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 1476-1492. doi:10.1037/0096- 1523.31.6.1476
8. Folk, C. L., & Anderson, B. A. (2010). Target uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Singleton detection mode or multiple attentionalcontrol settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 421-426. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.421
9. Folk, C. L., Ester, E., & Troemel, K. (2009). How to keep attention from straying: Get engaged! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 127-132. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.127
10. Folk, C. L., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741-753. doi:10.3758/BF03194741
11. Folk, C. L., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. (2008). Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 16, 616-642. doi:10.1080/13506280601134018
12. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in attentional capture by featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847
13. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional-control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
14. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 682-685. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.682
15. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20 .2.317
16. Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pitchler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61-92. doi:10.1080/ 026999300378996
17. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681-700. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.130.4.681
18. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition, 17, 120-140. doi:10.1080/13506280802349787
19. Hung, C. P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science, 310, 863-866. doi:10.1126/science.1117593
20. Kleiner M., Brainard D., & Pelli D. (2007) What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36 [ECVP Abstract Supplement]. Retrieved from http:// www.perceptionweb.com/abstract.cgi?idv070821
21. Levin, D. T., Takarae, Y., Miner, A., & Keil, F. C. (2001). Efficient visual search by category: Specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 676-697. doi:10.3758/BF03194429
22. Li, F.-F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9596-9601. doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599
23. Most, S. B., Chun, M. M., Widders, D. M., & Zald, D. H. (2005). Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 654- 661. doi:10.3758/BF03196754
24. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2
25. Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2009). Emotional scene content drives the saccade generation system reflexively. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 305-323. doi:10.1037/a0013626
26. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466-478. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
27. Olivers, C. N., & Meeter, M. (2008). A booster/bouncer theory of visual attention. Psychological Review; 115, 836-863. doi:10.1037/a0013395
28. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509- 522. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
29. Potter, M. C., & Fox, L. F. (2009). Detecting and remembering simultaneous pictures in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 28-38. doi:10.1037/a0013624
30. Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Pandav, R., & Olejarczyk, J. (2010). Picture detection in RSVP: Features or identity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1486 -94. doi: 10.1037/a0018730
31. Rinck, M., Becker, E. E., Kellerman, J., & Roth, W. T. (2003). Selective attention in anxiety: Distraction and enhancement in visual search. Depression and Anxiety, 18, 18-28.
32. Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629-630.
33. Schmidt, L., Belopolski, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). The presence of threat affects saccade trajectories. Visual Cognition, 20, 284-299. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.658885
34. Sulman & Sanocki. (2011). Top-down attentional capture by associated scenes in an object search task. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Vision Science Society, Naples, FL.
35. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
36. Thorpe, S., & Imbert, M. (1989). Biological constraints on connectionist models. In R. Pfeifer, Z. Schreter, F. Fogelman-Soulie, & L. Steels (Eds.), Connectionism in perspective (pp. 63-92). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
37. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010- 0285(80)90005-5
38. Vanrullen, R. (2009). Binding hardwired vs. on-demand feature conjunctions. Visual Cognition, 17, 103-119. doi:10.1080/13506280802196451
39. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2011). Unintended allocation of spatial attention to goal-relevant but not to goal-related events. Social Psychology, 42, 48-55. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000042
40. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Moors, A., Van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2010). The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 134, 61-69. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.006
41. Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 324-37. doi:10.1037/a0013903
42. Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Potter, M. (2009). Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35 787- 807. doi:10.1037/ a0013902