Learning with animation and illusions of understanding

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 278-289

  Paik, Eugene S ^a   Schraw, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Expertise reversal effect; Metacognition; Metacomprehension; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881098408     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030281     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Azevedo, R., & Witherspoon, A. M. (2009). Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 319-339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principle of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287-296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Betrancourt, M., & Tversky, B. (2000). Effects of computer animation on users' performance: A review. Le Travail Humain, 63, 311-329.
4. Blanch-Hartigan, D. (2011). Medical students' self-assessment of performance: Results from three meta-analyses. Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 3-9. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.037
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interaction. New York, NY: Irvington.
6. de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113-140. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
7. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
8. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
10. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597-602. doi:10.3758/BF03202442
11. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209-249. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2104_1
12. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
13. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations-Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 209-216. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042
14. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-345. doi:10.1080/0144341970170307
15. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
16. Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 911-930. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005
17. Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations. Computers & Education, 56, 176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.008
18. Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177-189. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00019-1
19. Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147-158). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390
22. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256-265. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256
23. Moreno, R. (2005). Multimedia learning with animated pedagogical agents. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 507-524). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.319
25. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-173.
26. Paik, E. (2009). Learning about dynamic systems with multimedia presentations containing motion animation and highlighting animation. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 684-693). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
27. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
28. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647
29. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2003). External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 117-123. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00015-4
30. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 304-356). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animation in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 47-58. doi:10.1007/BF02504797
32. Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2010). Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text. Memory, 18, 698-711. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.506441
33. Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278-298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Terricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
36. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 107-127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Tversky, B., & Morrison, J. B. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
38. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.