Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-189

  Lewalter, D ^a  

^a BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037400250     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00019-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
2. Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Relating instruction to research (pp. 209-239). Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21-51). New York: Plenum Press.
4. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Jäger, A. O., & Althoff, K. (1983). Der Wilde-Intelligenz-Test (WIT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
6. Joseph, J. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1984). The effects of prior knowledge, presentation mode, and visual realism on student achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 52, 110-121.
7. Lewalter, D. (1997). Lernen mit Bildern and Animationen. Münster: Waxmann.
8. Lowe, R. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
9. Lowe, R. (2003). Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
10. Mayer, R. E. (1994). Visual aids to knowledge construction: building mental representations from pictures and words. In W. Schnotz, & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 125-138). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Mayer, R. M. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
12. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
13. Park, O. -C., & Hopkins, R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review. Instructional Science, 21, 427-449.
14. Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 6, 117-160.
15. Reed, S. K. (1985). Effect of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 285-298.
16. Rieber, L. P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431-444.
17. Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, graphics & learning. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
18. Rieber, L. P., & Kini, A. S. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications of computer-generated animated visuals. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 83-88.
19. Weidenmann, B. (1988). When good pictures fail. An information processing approach to the effect of illustrations. In H. Mandl, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 157-171). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.