Dynamics of CO2 adsorption on sodium oxide promoted alumina in a packed-bed reactor

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 66, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 5938-5944

  Li, Mingheng ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breakthrough curve; CO2 adsorption; Dynamics; Modeling; Packed bed; Sodium oxide promoted alumina

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION DYNAMICS; BREAK THROUGH CURVE; COMPREHENSIVE MODEL; COUPLED TRANSPORT; DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETERS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; ORTHOGONAL COLLOCATION ON FINITE ELEMENTS; PACKED BED REACTOR; PILOT SCALE; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; REACTION PROCESS; WORK FOCUS;

ADSORPTION; COUPLED CIRCUITS; FLUE GASES; PACKED BEDS; SODIUM;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 80053268669     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. 2 from flue gas: A review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40:321-348.
2. Agarwal A., Biegler L.T., Zitney S.E. Simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption systems using reduced-order modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:2327-2343.
3. Baker J., Christofides P.D. Finite dimensional approximation and control of nonlinear parabolic PDE systems. Int. J. Control 2000, 73:439-456.
4. Bird R.B., Stewart W.E., Lightfoot E.N. Transport Phenomena 1960, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
5. Carvill B.T., Hufton J.R., Anand M., Sircar S. Sorption-enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 1996, 42:2765-2772.
6. 2 recovery. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2003, 20:617-623.
7. Christofides P.D., Daoutidis P. Finite-dimensional control of parabolic PDE systems using approximate inertial manifolds. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 216:398-420.
8. 2 recovery from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34:591-598.
9. Danckwerts P.V. Continuous flow systems: Distribution of residence times. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1953, 2:1-13.
10. Ding Y., Alpay E. Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55:3929-3940.
11. Duraiswamy K., Chellappa A., Smith G., Liu Y., Li M. Development of a high-efficiency hydrogen generator for fuel cells for distributed power generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:8962-8969.
12. Edwards M.F., Richardson J.F. Gas dispersion in packed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1968, 23:109-123.
13. Gordon, S., McBride, B.J., 1996. Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications, Technical Report NASA RP-1311, NASA Lewis Research Center.
14. 2 capture in natural gas. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:697-706.
15. Kolb G. Fuel Processing: For Fuel Cells 2008, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
16. 2 capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:2833-2841.
17. Lee K.B., Beaver M.G., Caram H.S., Sircar S. Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on sodium oxide promoted alumina. AIChE J. 2007, 53:2824-2831.
18. Lee K.B., Verdooren A., Caram H.S., Sircar S. Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on potassium-carbonate-promoted hydrotalcite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 308:30-39.
19. 2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:10604-10613.
20. Li M. Dynamics of axially dispersed reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:4797-4806.
21. Li M. Equilibrium calculation of gaseous reactive systems with simultaneous species adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:9263-9271.
22. Li M. Thermodynamic analysis of adsorption enhanced reforming of ethanol. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:9362-9372.
23. Li M., Christofides P.D. Optimal control of diffusion-convection-reaction processes using reduced-order models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32:2123-2135.
24. Li, M., Duraiswamy, K., Knobbe, M., Adsorption enhanced steam reforming of methanol for hydrogen generation in conjunction with fuel cell: Process design and reactor dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci., in press. http://doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.07.024.
25. Lindborg H., Jakobsen H.A. Sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process performance and bubbling fluidized bed reactor design analysis by use of a two-fluid model. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:1332-1342.
26. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:4467-4475.
27. 2 sorbent for sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:2522-2530.
28. Sircar S., Hufton J.R. Why does the linear driving force model for adsorption kinetics work? Adsorption 2000, 6:137-147.
29. Stankiewicz A. Reactive separations for process intensification: an industrial perspective. Chem. Eng. Process. 2003, 42:137-144.
30. Stevens, J.F., Krishnamurthy, B., Atanassova, P., Spilker, K., 2007. Development of 50kW Fuel Processor for Stationary Fuel Cell Applications, DOE Technical Report DOE/GO/13102-1, Chevron Technology Ventures, LLC.
31. U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2010. 〈〉 (accessed on April 18, 2011). http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/highlights.pdf.
32. Waxman, H.A., Markey, E.J., 2009. H. R. 2454: The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. Proposal to US House of Representatives (July 6, 2009).
33. Xiong R., Ida J., Lin Y.S. Kinetics of carbon dioxide sorption on potassium-doped lithium zirconate. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:4377-4385.
34. Yang H., Xu Z., Fan M., Gupta R., Slimane R., Bland A.E., Wright I. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20:14-27.
35. 2 at high temperature. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 23:77-80.
36. Yang R.T. Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes 1987, Butterworths, Boston, MA.
37. Yong Z., Mata V.G., Rodrigues A.E. Adsorption of carbon dioxide on chemically modified high surface area carbon-based adsorbents at high temperature. Adsorption 2001, 7:41-50.
38. 2 gas separation membrane processes for post-combustion capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:284-294.