Modeling, simulation, and optimization of postcombustion CO2 capture for variable feed concentration and flow rate. 2. Pressure swing adsorption and vacuum swing adsorption processes

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 51, Issue 48, 2012, Pages 15665-15682

  Hasan, M M Faruque ^a   Baliban, Richard C ^a   Elia, Josephine A ^a   Floudas, Christodoulos A ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

13X ZEOLITE; ADSORPTION MODEL; CHEMICAL ABSORPTION; EMISSION SCENARIO; FEED CONCENTRATION; FEED FLOW RATE; GAS COMPOSITIONS; KRIGING MODEL; LEAST COST; LOW VACUUM; NONISOTHERMAL; POST-COMBUSTION; PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION; PRODUCT RECOVERY; VACUUM SWING ADSORPTIONS;

ADSORPTION; COSTS; DEHYDRATION; FLOW RATE; FLUE GASES; OPTIMIZATION; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84870774150     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie301572n     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. IEA. Prospect of Limiting the Global Increase in Temperature to 2°C Is Getting Bleaker; 2011. http://www.iea.org/index-info.asp?id=1959.
2. Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; De Coninck, H. C.; Loos, M.; Meyer, L. A. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2005.
3. 2-laden streams and implications for capture technologies. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies; Elsvier: Vancouver, Canada, 2004; Vol. 1: Peer-Reviewed Papers and Plenary Presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme.
4. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4467-4475
5. 2 capture from flue gases using membrane technology Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1562-1568
6. 2 capture from flue gases using pressure swing adsorption Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 4883-4890
7. 2 Separation from Flue Gas, Pipeline Transportation, and Sequestration in Coal; 2007. http://www.inl.gov/ technicalpublications/Documents/4010767.pdf.
8. 2 Concentration and Feed Flow. 1. Chemical Absorption and Membrane Processes Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 10.1021/ie301571d
9. 2 recovery from flue gas at high temperature using a hydrotalcite-like adsorbent Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4278-4294
10. 2 recovery from flue gas: Part I. Performance evaluation Adsorption 2008, 14, 399-413
11. Radosz, M.; Hu, X.; Krutkramelis, K.; Shen, Y. Flue-gas carbon capture on carbonaceous sorbents: toward a low-cost multifunctional carbon filter for green energy producers Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 3783-3794
12. 2 sequestration Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 339-348
13. 2 capture AIChE J. 2010, 56, 1813-1828
14. 2 Capture. Proceedings of the 21th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE21); Elsevier: Porto Carras, Chalkidiki, Greece, 2011; pp 402-406.
15. 2 capture from flue gas Energy Convers. Manage. 2008, 49, 346-356
16. 2 capture from power plant flue gas. Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2011.
17. Ruthven, D. M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1984.
18. Ruthven, D. M.; Farooq, S.; Knaebel, K. S. Pressure Swing Adsorption; VCH Publishers: New York, 1994.
19. Yang, R. T. Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes; Butterworths: Boston, MA, 1987.
20. 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 1438-1463
21. D'Alessandro, D.; Smit, B.; Long, J. Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058-6082
22. Smith, O. J., IV; Westerberg, A. W. The optimal design of pressure swing adsorption systems Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46, 2967-2976
23. Nilchan, S.; Pantelides, C. C. On the optimization of periodic adsorption processes Adsorption 1998, 4, 113-147
24. 2 capture Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8084-8094
25. Ding, Y.; T Croft, D.; LeVan, M. Periodic states of adsorption cycles IV. Direct optimization Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 4521-4531
26. Jiang, L.; Biegler, L.; Fox, V. Simulation and optimization of pressure-swing adsorption systems for air separation AIChE J. 2003, 49, 1140-1157
27. Cruz, P.; Santos, J.; Magalhaes, F.; Mendes, A. Cyclic adsorption separation processes: analysis strategy and optimization procedure Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 3143-3158
28. Cruz, P.; Magalhaes, F.; Mendes, A. On the optimization of cyclic adsorption separation processes AIChE J. 2005, 51, 1377-1395
29. Nikolíc, D.; Kikkinides, E. S.; Georgiadis, M. C. Optimization of multibed pressure swing adsorption processes Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 5388-5398
30. Agarwal, A.; Biegler, L. T.; Zitney, S. E. Simulation and optimization of pressure swing adsorption systems using reduced-order modeling Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 2327-2343
31. 2 capture Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 49, 5066-5079
32. Khajuria, H.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. Optimization and control of pressure swing adsorption processes under uncertainty AIChE J. 2012, 10.1002/aic.13783
33. 2 gas mixtures and their application in compression processes Energy Procedia 2011, 3778-3785
34. Fisher, K. S.; Searcy, K.; Rochelle, G. T.; Ziaii, S.; Schubert, C. Advanced Amine Solvent Formulations and Process Integration for Near-Term CO2. Capture Success; Report submitted to U.S. Department of Energy; 2007. Available at http://www.trimeric.com/DOE-KPIP-SBIR-Final-021908.pdf.
35. Uppaluri, R. V. S.; Linke, P.; Kokossis, A. C. Synthesis and optimization of gas permeation membrane networks Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 4305-4322
36. 2 from high humidity flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption with zeolite 13X Adsorption 2008, 14, 415-422
37. Rama Rao, V.; Farooq, S.; Krantz, W. B. Design of a two-step pulsed pressure-swing adsorption-based oxygen concentrator AIChE J. 2010, 56, 354-3370
38. 2 on solid sorbents. Proceedings of the First Conference on Carbon Sequestration; NETL: Pittsburgh, 2001.
39. Seider, W. D.; Seader, J. D.; Lewin, D. R.; Widagdo, S. Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation; Wiley: New York, 2004.
40. Jones, D. R.; Schonlau, M.; Welch, W. J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions J. Global Optim. 1998, 13, 455-492
41. Caballero, J. A.; Grossmann, I. E. An algorithm for the use of surrogate models in modular flowsheet optimization AIChE J. 2008, 54, 2633-2650
42. Davis, E.; Ierapetritou, M. A kriging method for the solution of nonlinear programs with black-box functions AIChE J. 2007, 53, 2001-2012
43. Simpson, T. W.; Mauery, T. M.; Korte, J. J.; Mistree, F. Comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. In Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, AIAA: St. Louis, MO, 1998; Vol. 1, pp. 381-391.
44. Webley, P. A.; He, J. Fast solution-adaptive finite volume method for PSA/VSA cycle simulation; 1 single step simulation Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 23, 1701-1712