Isolation of Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis and Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans from rumen of Creole goats fed native forage diet

Folia Microbiologica

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 367-373

  Grilli, D J ^a,c   Ceron M E ^d   Paez, S ^b   Egea, V ^b   Schnittger, L ^d   Cravero, S ^d   Escudero, M Sosa ^e   Allegretti, L ^b   Arenas, G N ^c  

^a Universidad Juan Agustin Maza   (Argentina)

^b LABORATORIO DE ENTOMOLOGÍA   (Argentina)

^c FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS MÉDICAS   (Argentina)

^d INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA   (Argentina)

^e Instituto de Histologia y Embriologia   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; ATRIPLEX; ATRIPLEX LAMPA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAPRA HIRCUS; MEDICAGO SATIVA; PROSOPIS; PROSOPIS FLEXUOSA; PSEUDOBUTYRIVIBRIO RUMINIS; PSEUDOBUTYRIVIBRIO XYLANIVORANS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84881024587     PISSN: 00155632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12223-012-0219-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2006) Official methods of analysis. Association Official of Analytical Chemists International, Washington.
2. Bryant MP, Robinson IM (1961) An improved nonselective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of bacteria in the rumen. J Dairy Sci 44: 1446-1456.
3. Caldwell DR, Bryant MP (1966) Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 14: 794-801.
4. Čepeljnik T, Zorec M, Kostanjsek R et al (2003) Is Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans Mz5T suitable as a probiotic? An in vitro study. Folia Microbiol 48(3): 339-345.
5. Čepeljnik T, Krizaj I, Marinšek-Logar R (2004) Isolation and characterization of the Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans Mz5T xylanase XynT- the first family 11 endoxylanase from rumen Butyrivibrio-related bacteria. Enzyme Microb Technol 34: 219-227.
6. T. Folia Microbiol 51: 263-267.
7. Cheng KJ, Mcallistert A, Mathiesens D et al (1993) Seasonal changes in the adherent microflora of the rumen in high-arctic Svalbard reindeer. Can J Microbiol 39: 101-108.
8. Chevenet F, Brun C, Banuls AL et al (2006) TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinforma 7: 439.
9. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A et al (1994) The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44: 812-826.
10. Cotta MA (1988) Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 772-776.
11. Dalrymple BP, McSweeney CS (1998) Manipulation of rumen function by the inoculation of novel microorganisms. Outlook Agr 27: 107-113.
12. Dalrymple B, Swadling Y, Layton I, Gobius K, Xue G (1999) Distribution and evolution of the xylanase genes xynA and xynB and their homologues in strains of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 3660-3667.
13. Dehority BA (1966) Characterization of several bovine rumen bacteria isolated with a xylan medium. J Bacteriol 91: 1724-1729.
14. Dehority BA (1969) Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol 99: 189-196.
15. Dehority BA, Tirabasso PA, Grifo AP (1989) Most probable number procedures for enumerating ruminal bacteria, including the simultaneous estimation of total and cellulolytic numbers in one medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 2789-2792.
16. Dehority BA (2003) Numbers, factors affecting the population and distribution or rumen bacteria. In: Dehority BA (ed) Rumen microbiology, 1st edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 265-294.
17. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG et al. (2011) InfoStat versión 2011. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
18. Draksler D, Gonzáles S, Oliver G (2004) Preliminary assays for the development of a probiotic for goats. Reprod Nutr Dev 44: 397-405.
19. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5): 1792-1797.
20. Edwards JE, McEwan NR, Travis AJ, John Wallace R (2004) 16S rDNA library based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86: 263-281.
21. Elias I, Lagergren J (2007) Fast computation of distance estimators. BMC Bioinforma 8: 89.
22. Federal Animal Science Society (2010) Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Champaign.
23. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package (version 3. 2). Cladistics 5: 164-166.
24. Fonty G, Gouet P, Jouany JP, Senaud J (1983) Ecological factors determining establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and protozoa in the rumens of meroxenic lambs. J Gen Microbiol 129: 213-223.
25. Forster R, Teather R, Gong J, Deng S (1996) 16S rDNA analysis of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens: phylogenetic position and relation to butyrate-producing anaerobic bacteria from the rumen of white-tailed deer. Lett Appl Microbiol 23: 218-222.
26. Frutos P, Hervás G, Giráldez FJ, Mantecón AR (2004) Review: tannins and ruminant nutrition. Span J Agric Res 2(2): 191-202.
27. Grubb JA, Dehority BA (1975) Effects of an abrupt change in ration from all roughage to high concentrate upon rumen microbial numbers in sheep. Appl Microbiol 30(3): 404-412.
28. Grubb JA, Dehority BA (1976) Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 31: 262-267.
29. Hungate RE, Dougherty RW, Bryant MP, Cello RM (1952) Microbiological and physiological changes associated with acute indigestion in sheep. Cornell Vet 42: 423-449.
30. Hungate RE (1966) The rumen and its microbes. Academic, New York.
31. Kern DL, Slyter LL, Leffel EC et al (1974) Ponies vs steers: microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta. J Anim Sci 38: 559-564.
32. Kopečný J, Zorec M, Mrázek J et al (2003) Butyrivibrio hungatei sp. nov. and Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans sp. nov., butyrate producing bacteria from the rumen. Int J Sys Bacteriol 53: 1-9.
33. Leedle J, Bryant MP, Hespell R (1982) Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets. Appl Environ Microbiol 44: 402-412.
34. National Research Council (1985) Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academies Press, Washington.
35. National Research Council (2007) Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academies Press, Washington.
36. Orpin CG, Mathisen SD, Greenwood Y, Blix AS (1985) Seasonal changes in the ruminal micloflora of the high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Appl Environ Microbiol 50: 144-151.
37. Persia ME, Dehority BA, Lilburn MS (2002) The effects of enzyme supplementation of corn- and wheat-based diets on nutrient digestion and cecal microbial populations in turkey. J Appl Poult Res 11: 134-145.
38. Silanikove N, Brosh A (1989) Lignocellulose degradation and subsequent metabolism of lignin fermentation products by the desert black Bedouin goat fed on wheat straw as a single component diet. Brit J Nutr 62: 509-520.
39. Sinha RN, Ranganathan B (1983) Cellulolytic bacteria in buffalo rumen. J Appl Microbiol 54: 1-6.
40. Stewart CS, Bryant MP (1988) The rumen bacteria. In: Hobson PN (ed) The rumen microbial ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 21-75.
41. Tajima K, Aminov R, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y (1999) Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29: 159-169.
42. van Gylswyk NO, Hippe H, Rainey FA (1996) Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a butyrate-producing bacterium from the rumen that closely resembles Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens in phenotype. Int J Sys Bacteriol 46: 559-563.
43. Zorec M, Čepeljnik T, Nekrep F, Marinšek-Logar R (2001) Multiple endoxylanases of Butyrivibrio sp. Folia Microbiol 46(1): 94-96.