Horizontal institutional interlinkages

Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 175-198

  Zelli, Fariborz ^a,b   Gupta, Aarti ^c   Van Asselt, Harro ^d  

^a GERMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b TYNDALL CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881009566     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13-24.
2. Arts, Bas, and Marleen Buizer. 2009. Forests, Discourses, Institutions: A Discursive- Institutional Analysis of Global Forest Governance. Forest Policy and Economics 11 (5-6): 340-347.
3. Bäckstrand, Karin, and Eva L ö vbrand. 2006. Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality, and Civic Environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics 6 (1): 50-75.
4. Bernstein, Steven. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Bernstein, Steven. 2002. Liberal Environmentalism and Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3): 1-16.
6. Bhagwati, Jagdish, and Petros C. Mavroidis. 2007. Is Action against US Exports for Failure to Sign Kyoto Protocol WTO-Legal? World Trade Review 6 (2): 299-310.
7. Biermann, Frank, and Rainer Brohm. 2005. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the United States: The Strategic Role of Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border. Climate Policy 4 (3): 289-302.
8. Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, and Fariborz Zelli. 2009. The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis . Global Environmental Politics 9 (4): 14-40.
9. Biermann, Frank, Fariborz Zelli, Philipp Pattberg, and Harro van Asselt. 2010. The Architecture of Global Climate Governance: Setting the Stage. In Global Climate Governance beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation, ed. Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, and Fariborz Zelli, 15-24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Boyd, Emily, Esteve Corbera, and Manuel Estrada. 2008. UNFCCC Negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): What the Process Says about the Politics of CDM-Sinks. International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics 8 (2): 95-112.
11. Brewer, Thomas L. 2003. The Trade Regime and the Climate Regime: Institutional Evolution and Adaptation. Climate Policy 3 (4): 329-341.
12. Brewer, Thomas L. 2004. The WTO and the Kyoto Protocol: Interaction Issues. Climate Policy 4 (1): 3-12.
13. Cartagena Protocol. 2000. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
14. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2008a. Monitoring and Reporting under the Protocol (Article 33): Analysis of Information Contained in the First National Reports. Note by the Executive Secretary. UNEP/CBD/BS/COPMOP/ 4/13, 4 February
15. CBD. 2008b. Operation and Activities of the Biosafety Clearing-House. Note by the Executive Secretary. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/3, 29 February.
16. CBD. 2008c. Report of the 2007 Survey of Biosafety Clearing-House Users. Note by the Executive Secretary. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/INF/20, 3 March.
17. CBD Secretariat. 2003. Interlinkages between Biological Diversity and Climate Change: Advice on the Integration of Biodiversity Considerations into the Implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Its Kyoto Protocol. Montreal: Secretariat of the CBD.
18. Chambers, W. Bradnee. 2008. Interlinkages and the Effectiveness of Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
19. Chambers, W. Bradnee, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have. 2008. Institutional Interplay and the Governance of Biosafety. In Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade, ed. Oran R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, 3-18. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
20. Charnovitz, Steve. 2003. Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies. In Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change, ed. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 141-170. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
21. Conca, Ken. 2006. Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Cottier, Thomas, Olga Nartova, and Sadeq Z. Bigdeli, eds. 2009. International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2): 24-40.
24. Eckersley, Robyn. 2008. A Critical Constructivist Theory of Regime Interplay: The Kyoto Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association. San Francisco, 26-29 March.
25. Eckersley, Robyn. 2009. Understanding the Interplay between the Climate and Trade Regimes. In Climate and Trade Policies in a post-2012 World, ed. United Nations Environment Programme (Benjamin Simmons) and the ADAM Project (Harro van Asselt and Fariborz Zelli), 11-18. Geneva: UNEP.
26. Falkner, Robert, and Aarti Gupta. 2009. Limits of Regulatory Convergence: Globalization and GMO Politics in the South. International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics 9 (2): 113-133.
27. Frankel, Jeffrey. 2005. Climate and Trade: Links between the Kyoto Protocol and WTO. Environment 47 (7): 8-19.
28. Grainger, Alan, Douglas H. Boucher, Peter C. Frumhoff, William F. Laurance, Thomas Lovejoy, Jeffrey McNeely, Manfred Niekisch, et al. 2009. Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. Current Biology 19 (21): R974-R976.
29. Gupta, Aarti. 2002. Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis to Govern Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 9 (1): 265-281.
30. Gupta, Aarti. 2008. Global Biosafety Governance: Emergence and Evolution. In Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade, ed. Oran R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim and Claudia ten Have, 19-46. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
31. Gupta, Aarti. 2010a. Transparency to What End? Governing by Disclosure through the Biosafety Clearing-House. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (2): 128-144.
32. Gupta, Aarti. 2010b. Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why Does It Matter? Global Environmental Politics 10 (3): 32-52.
33. Harvey, Celia A., Barney Dickson, and Cyril Kormos. 2010. Opportunities for Achieving Biodiversity Conservation through REDD. Conservation Letters 3 (1): 53-61.
34. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Herr, Richard A., and Edmund Chia. 1995. The Concept of Regime Overlap: Toward Identification and Assessment. In Overlapping Maritime Regimes: An Initial Reconnaissance, ed. Bruce Davis, 11-26. Hobart, Australia: Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre and Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies.
36. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2002. Climate Change and Biodiversity. Geneva: IPCC.
37. Isaac, Grant E., and William A. Kerr. 2003. Genetically Modified Organisms at the World Trade Organisation: A Harvest of Trouble. Journal of World Trade 37 (6): 1083-1095.
38. Ismer, Roland, and Karsten Neuhoff. 2007. Border Tax Adjustment: A Feasible Way to Support Stringent Emission Trading. European Journal of Law and Economics 24 (2): 137-164.
39. Jacquemont, Fr é d é ric, and Alejandro Caparr ó s. 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years after Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 11 (2): 139-180.
40. Keohane, Robert O., and David G. Victor. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7-23.
41. Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. Levidow, Les. 2007. The Transatlantic Agbiotech Conflict as a Problem and Opportunity for EU Regulatory Policies. In The International Politics of Genetically Modified Food: Diplomacy, Trade, and Law, ed. Robert Falkner, 118-137. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Lieberman, Sarah, and Tim Grey. 2008. The World Trade Organization' s Report on the EU' s Moratorium on Biotech Products: The Wisdom of the US Challenge to the EU in the WTO. Global Environmental Politics 8 (1): 33-52.
44. Mehri, Cyrus. 1988. Prior Informed Consent: An Emerging Compromise for Hazardous Exports. Cornell International Law Journal 21: 365-389.
45. Meinshausen, Malte, and Bill Hare. 2003. Sinks in the CDM: After the Climate, Biodiversity Goes Down the Drain. An Analysis of the CDM Sinks Agreement at CoP-9. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ Global/international/planet-2/report/2006/3/sinks-in-the-cdm-after-the-cl-2.pdf.
46. Millstone, Eric, and Patrick van Zwanenberg. 2003. Food and Agricultural Biotechnology Policy: How Much Autonomy Can Developing Countries Exercise? Development Policy Review 21 (5): 655-667.
47. Oberth ü r, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006a. Conceptual Foundations and Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 19-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Oberth ü r, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring, eds. 2006b. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006c. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics 6 (2): 1-31.
50. Oberth ü r, Sebastian, and Olav Schram Stokke, eds. 2011. Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two- Level Games. International Organization 42 (3): 427-460.
52. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277-309.
53. Rosendal, G. Kristin. 2001. Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity. Global Governance 7 (1): 95-117.
54. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4): 855-885.
55. Safrin, Sabrina. 2002. Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements. American Journal of International Law 96 (3): 606-628.
56. Sagem ü ller, Imke. 2006. Forest Sinks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol: Opportunity or Risk for Biodiversity? Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 31 (2): 189-242.
57. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2002. Regieren im europ ä ischen Mehrebenensystem. Ans ä tze zu einer Theorie. Leviathan 30 (1): 65-93.
58. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303-326.
59. Schreurs, Miranda A. 2004. The Climate Change Divide: The European Union, the United States, and the Future of the Kyoto Protocol. In Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, ed. Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure, 207-230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Selin, Henrik, and Stacy D. VanDeveer. 2003. Mapping Institutional Linkages in European Air Pollution Politics. Global Environmental Politics 3 (3): 14-46.
61. Sprinz, Detlef F. 2005. Regime Effectiveness. The Next Wave of Research. Paper Prepared for the 2005 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 2-3 December.
62. Stilwell, Matthew T., and Elisabeth Tuerk. 1999. Trade Measures and Multilateral Agreements: Resolving Uncertainty and Removing the WTO Chill Factor. WWF International Discussion Paper, November.
63. Stockwell, Claire, Bill Hare, and Kirsten Macey. 2009. Designing a REDD Mechanism: The TDERM Triptych. In Climate Law and Developing Countries: Legal and Policy Challenges for the World Economy, ed. Benjamin J. Richardson, Yves Le Bouthillier, Heather McLeod-Kilmurray, and Stepan Wood, 151-177. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
64. Stokke, Olav Schram, ed. 2001a. Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2001b. The Interplay of International Regimes. Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. FNI Report No. 14/2001. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
66. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2004. Trade Measures and Climate Compliance: Institutional Interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords. International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics 4 (4): 339-357.
67. Thomas, Urs P. 2004. Trade and the Environment: Stuck in a Political Impasse at the WTO after the Doha and Canc ú n Ministerial Conferences. Global Environmental Politics 4 (3): 9-21.
68. Underdal, Arild. 2006. Determining the Causal Significance of Institutions. Accomplishments and challenges paper prepared for the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Project Synthesis Conference, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, 6-9 December.
69. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006. Decision 16/CMP.1, Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (30 March 2006). UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3.
70. van Asselt, Harro. 2011a. Dealing with the Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance: Legal and Political Approaches in Interplay Management. In Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Olav Schram Stokke, 59-85. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. van Asselt, Harro. 2011b. Integrating Biodiversity in the Climate Regime' s Forest Rules: Options and Tradeoffs in Greening REDD Design. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 11 (2): 139-149.
72. van Asselt, Harro, and Thomas Brewer. 2010. Addressing Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns in Climate Policy: An Analysis of Border Adjustment Measures in the US and the EU. Energy Policy 38 (1): 42-51.
73. van Asselt, Harro, and Joyeeta Gupta. 2009. Stretching Too Far? Developing Countries and the Role of Flexibility Mechanisms beyond Kyoto. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 28 (2): 311-379.
74. van Asselt, Harro, Joyeeta Gupta, and Frank Biermann. 2005. Advancing the Climate Agenda: Exploiting Material and Institutional Linkages to Develop a Menu of Policy Options. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 14 (3): 255-264.
75. van Asselt, Harro, Francesco Sindico, and Michael A. Mehling. 2008. Global Climate Change and the Fragmentation of International Law. Law & Policy 30 (4): 423-449.
76. Wolf, Amanda. 2000. Informed Consent: A Negotiated Formula for Trade in Risky Organisms and Chemicals. International Negotiation 5 (3): 485 - 521.
77. Wolfrum, R ü diger, and Nele Matz. 2003. Conflicts in International Environmental Law. Berlin: Springer.
78. Yamin, Farhana, and Joanna Depledge. 2004. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions, and Procedures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Young, Oran R. 1996. Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 1-24.
80. Young, Oran R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Young, Oran R. 2008. Deriving Insights from the Case of the WTO and the Cartagena Protocol. In Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade, ed. Oran R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, 131-158. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
82. Young, Oran R., Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder. 2008. Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Zelli, Fariborz. 2007. The World Trade Organization: Free Trade and Its Environmental Impacts. In Handbook of Globalization and the Environment, ed. Khi V. Thai, Dianne Rahm, and Jerrell D. Coggburn, 177-216. London: Taylor and Francis.
84. Zelli, Fariborz. 2011a. The Fragmentation of the Global Climate Governance Architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 (2): 255-270.
85. Zelli, Fariborz. 2011b. Regime Conflicts and Their Management in Global Environmental Governance. In Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Olav Schram Stokke, 199-226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Zelli, Fariborz, Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, and Harro van Asselt. 2010. The Consequences of a Fragmented Climate Governance Architecture: A Policy Appraisal. In Global Climate Governance beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation, ed. Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, and Fariborz Zelli, 25-34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87. Zelli, Fariborz, and Harro van Asselt. 2010. The Overlap between the UN Climate Regime and the World Trade Organization: Lessons for post-2012 Climate Governance. In Global Climate Governance beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation, ed. Frank Biermann, Philipp Pattberg, and Fariborz Zelli, 79-96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.