Legal and political approaches in interplay management: Dealing with the fragmentation of global climate governance

Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 59-85

  van Asselt, Harro ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881018102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Assunção, Lucas, and Zhong Xiang Zhang. 2002. Domestic Climate Policies and the WTO. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Discussion Paper No. 164. Geneva: UNCTAD.
2. Biermann, Frank. 2005. The Rationale for a World Environment Organization. In A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance?, ed. Frank Biermann and Steffen Bauer, 117-144. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
3. Biermann, Frank, and Steffen Bauer, eds. 2005. A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance? Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
4. Borgen, Christopher J. 2005. Resolving Treaty Conflicts. George Washington International Law Review 37 (3): 573-648.
5. Brown Weiss, Edith. 1993. International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New Order. Georgetown Law Journal 81: 675-710.
6. Brunnée, Jutta. 2002. COPing with Consent: Law Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (1): 1-52.
7. CBD. 2000. Decision V/4, Progress Report on the Implementation of the Programme of Work for Forest Biological Diversity. Convention on Biological Diversity. UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23 of 22 June 2000.
8. CBD. 2004. Decision VII/15, Biodiversity and Climate Change. Convention on Biological Diversity. UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/7/21 of 13 April 2004.
9. CBD. 2008. Decision IX/16, Biodiversity and Climate Change. Convention on Biological Diversity. UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/9/29 of 30 May 2008.
10. Chambers, W. Bradnee, ed. 2001. Inter-linkages: The Kyoto Protocol and the International Trade and Investment Regimes. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
11. Chambers, W. Bradnee. 2008. Interlinkages and the Effectiveness of Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
12. Charnovitz, Steve. 2003. Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies. In Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change, ed. Elliott Diringer, 141-170. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center for Global Climate Change.
13. Charnovitz, Steve. 2005. Toward a World Environment Organization: Reflections upon a Vital Debate. In A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance? ed. Frank Biermann and Steffen Bauer, 87-116. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
14. Doelle, Meinhard. 2004. Linking the Kyoto Protocol and Other Multilateral Environmental Agreements: From Fragmentation to Integration? Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 14: 75-104.
15. French, Duncan. 2006. Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2): 281-314.
16. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberthür. 2006. Comparative Empirical Analysis and Ideal Types of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 307-371. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. Hicks, Bethany Lukitsch. 1999. Treaty Congestion in International Environmental Law: The Need for Greater International Coordination, Comment. University of Richmond Law Review 32 (4): 1643-1674.
18. ILC. 2006. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. ILC Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 of 13 April 2006. Geneva: International Law Commission.
19. IPCC. 2002. Climate Change and Biodiversity. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
20. Jacquemont, Frédéric, and Alejandro Caparr ó s. 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years after Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 11 (2): 139-180.
21. Jenks, Wilfred. 1953. The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties. British Yearbook of International Law 30: 401-453.
22. Kornicker Uhlmann, Eva M. 1998. State Community Interests, Jus Cogens and Protection of the Global Environment: Developing Criteria for Peremptory Norms. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 11 (1): 101-135.
23. Linnér, Björn-Ola. 2006. Authority through Synergism: The Roles of Climate Change Linkages. European Environment 16 (5): 278-289.
24. McCabe, Daniel G. 2007. Resolving Conflicts between Multilateral Environmental Agreements: The Case of the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols. Fordham Environmental Law Review 18: 433-466.
25. McLachlan, Campbell. 2005. The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54: 279-319.
26. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2001. Linkages between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols: Enhancing Synergies between Protecting the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1 (3): 357-377.
27. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2002. Clustering of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Potential and Limitations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2 (4): 317-340.
28. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2003. Institutional Interaction to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Transport: ICAO, IMO and the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy 3 (3): 191-205.
29. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2006. The Climate Change Regime: Interactions with ICAO, IMO, and the EU Burden-Sharing Agreement. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring, 53-77. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30. Oberthür, Sebastian. 2009. Interplay Management: Enhancing Environmental Policy Integration among International Institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9 (4): 371-391.
31. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2004. Reforming International Environmental Governance: An Institutionalist Critique of the Proposal for a World Environment Organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4 (4): 349-381.
32. Paulus, Andreas L. 2005. Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation. Nordic Journal of International Law 74 (3-4): 297-334.
33. Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Pontecorvo, Concetta Maria. 1999. Interdependence between Global Environmental Regimes: The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and Forest Protection. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 59 (3): 709-749.
35. Ramsar. 2002. Resolution VIII.3, Climate Change and Wetlands: Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation. Eighth Conference of the Parties, 18-26 November 2002. http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/res/key_res_viii_03_e.pdf (accessed 13 April 2010).
36. SCBD. 2003. Interlinkages Between Biological Diversity and Climate Change: Advice on the Integration of Biodiversity Considerations into the Implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Its Kyoto Protocol. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
37. Scott, Karen N. 2005. The Day after Tomorrow: Ocean CO 2 Sequestration and the Future of Climate Change. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 18 (1): 57-108.
38. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2001. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. FNI Report No. 14. Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
39. Stokke, Olav Schram. 2004. Trade Measures and Climate Compliance: Institutional Interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4 (4): 339-357.
40. UNCCD. 1999. Review of Activities for the Promotion and Strengthening of Relationships with Other Relevant Conventions and Relevant International Organizations, Institutions and Agencies: Collaboration and Synergies among Rio Conventions for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. Note by the Secretariat. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. UN Doc. ICCD/COP(3)/9 of 28 September 1999.
41. UNCCD. 2005. Review of Activities for the Promotion and Strengthening of Relationships with Other Relevant Conventions and Relevant International Organizations, Institutions and Agencies, in Accordance with Article 8 and Article 22, Paragraph 2 (i) of the Convention. Note by the Secretariat. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. UN Doc. ICCD/COP(7)/5 of 5 August 2005.
42. UNEP/WTO. 2009. Trade and Climate Change: A Report by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization.
43. UNFCCC. 1999. Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on Its Tenth Session Bonn, 31 May-11 June 1999. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/1999/6 of 23 August 1999.
44. UNFCCC. 2001. Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on Its Fourteenth Session, Bonn, 24-27 July 2001. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/2001/2 of 18 September 2001.
45. UNFCCC. 2003a. Decision 13/CP.8, Cooperation with Other Conventions. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN Doc. FCCC/ CP/2002/7/Add.1 of 28 March 2003.
46. UNFCCC. 2003b. Cooperation with Relevant International Organizations: World Trade Organization. Note by the Secretariat. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/2003/INF.7 of 14 May 2003.
47. UNFCCC. 2004. Options for Enhanced Cooperation among the Three Rio Conventions. Note by the Secretariat. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/2004/INF.19 of 2 November 2004 Annex.
48. van Asselt, Harro, and Frank Biermann. 2007. European Emissions Trading and the International Competitiveness of Energy-Intensive Industries: A Legal and Political Evaluation of Possible Supporting Measures. Energy Policy 35 (1): 497-506.
49. van Asselt, Harro, Joyeeta Gupta, and Frank Biermann. 2005. Advancing the Climate Agenda: Exploiting Material and Institutional Linkages to Develop a Menu of Policy Options. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 14 (3): 255-264.
50. Velasquez, Jerry, and Uli Piest. 2003. Case Studies on Inter-linkages and Environmental Governance in 14 Asia and Pacific Countries. Global Environmental Change 13 (1): 61-68.
51. Vierdag, E. W. 1988. The Time of the "Conclusion" of a Multilateral Treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Related Provisions. British Yearbook of International Law 59: 75-111.
52. Voigt, Christina. 2009. Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts between Climate Measures and WTO Law. Leiden: Brill.
53. von Moltke, Konrad. 2005. Clustering International Environmental Agreements as an Alternative to a World Environment Organization. In A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance?, ed. Frank Biermann and Steffen Bauer, 175-204. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
54. Vranes, Erich. 2006. The Definition of "Norm Conflict" in International Law and Legal Theory. European Journal of International Law 17 (2): 395-418.
55. Werksman, Jacob. 1999. Formal Linkages and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. http://www.geic.or.jp/interlinkages/docs/jake.PDF (accessed 13 April 2010).
56. Werksman, Jacob, Kevin A. Baumert, and Navroz K. Dubash. 2003. Will International Investment Rules Obstruct Climate Protection Policies? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3 (1): 59-86.
57. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, and Nele Matz. 2003. Conflicts in International Environmental Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
58. Yamin, Farhana, and Joanna Depledge. 2004. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Young, Oran R. 1996. Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 1-24.