The institutional complex of trade and environment: Toward an interlocking governance structure and a division of labor

Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 227-254

  Gehring, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880996274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Abbott, Kenneth, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54: 421 - 456
2. Benedick, Richard E. 1995. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
3. Brack, Duncan. 2002. Environmental Treaties and Trade: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System. In Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, 2nd ed., ed. Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers, 321 - 352. Tokyo: United Nations University Press
4. Charnovitz, Steve. 1998. The World Trade Organization and the Environment. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 8: 98 - 116
5. Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality. Yale Journal of International Law 27 (1): 59 - 110
6. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2): 24 - 50
7. Eggers, Barbara, and Ruth Mackenzie. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Journal of International Economic Law 3 (3): 525 - 543
8. Esty, Daniel C. 1994. Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment and the Future. Harlow: Longman
9. Esty, Daniel C., and Damien Geradin. 1998. Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness. Journal of World Trade 32 (3): 5 - 46
10. Falkner, Robert. 2000. Regulating Biotech Trade: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. International Affairs 76 (2): 299 - 313
11. Falkner, Robert. 2002. Negotiating the Biosafety Protocol. The International Process. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, ed. Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner, and Helen Marquard, 3 - 22. London: RIIA/Earthscan
12. Farber, Daniel A., and Robert E. Hudec. 1996. GATT Legal Restraints on Domestic Environmental Regulations. In Fair Trade and Harmonization. Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 2, Legal Analysis, ed. Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec, 59 - 94. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
13. GATT. 1995. Report of the Chairman of the Group on Environmental Measures and International Trade presented to the Contracting Parties at Their Forty-ninth Session, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Vol. 40. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1992. " Trade and Environment. " Basic Instruments and Selected Documents. Geneva: GATT
14. GATT. 1994. Dispute Settlement Panel Report on United States Restrictions on Imports of Tuna. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. International Legal Materials 33: 839 - 899
15. Gehring, Thomas. 1994. Dynamic International Regimes: Institutions for International Environmental Governance. Frankfurt: Peter Lang
16. Gehring, Thomas. 2002. Die Europ ä ische Union als komplexe internationale Organisation: Wie durch Kommunikation und Entscheidung soziale Ordnung entsteht. Baden-Baden: Nomos
17. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberth ü r. 2006. Comparative Empirical Analysis and Ideal Types of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Confl ict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 307 - 371. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
18. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberth ü r. 2009. The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations 15: 125 - 156
19. George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
20. Hansen, Patricia I. 1999. Transparency, Standards of Review, and the Use of Trade Measures to Protect the Global Environment. Virginia Journal of International Law 39: 1017 - 1068
21. Hedstr ö m, Peter, and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, ed. Peter Hedstr ö m and Richard Swedberg, 1 - 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Hoekman, Bernard M., and Michael M. Kostecki. 1995. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Howse, Robert, and Joshua Meltzer. 2002. The Signifi cance of the Protocol for WTO Dispute Settlement. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, ed. Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner, and Helen Marquard, 482 - 496. London: RIIA/ Earthscan
24. Howse, Robert, and Donald Regan. 2000. The Product/Process Distinction: An Illusionary Basis for Disciplining " Unilateralism " in Trade Policy. European Journal of International Law 11 (2): 249 - 289
25. Howse, Robert, and Michael J. Trebilcock. 1997. The Free Trade - Fair Trade Debate. Trade, Labour and the Environment. In Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives, ed. Jagdeep Bhandari and Alan O. Sykes, 186 - 234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
26. Hudec, Robert E. 1996. GATT Legal Restraints on the Use of Trade Measures against Foreign Environmental Practices. In Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 2, Legal Analysis, ed. Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec, 95 - 174. Cambridge, Mass .: MIT Press
27. Jackson, John H. 1999. The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
28. Kingsbury, Benedict. 1995. The Tuna - Dolphin Controversy, the World Trade Organization and the Liberal Project to Reconceptualize International Law. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 5: 1 - 40
29. Kummer, Katharina. 1995. International Management of Hazardous Wastes: The Basel Convention and Related Legal Rules. Oxford: Clarendon
30. Mattli, Walter. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power. World Politics 56 (1): 1 - 42
31. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring, eds. 2006a. Institutional Interaction in International and EU Environmental Governance: Synergy and Confl ict between Sectoral Legal Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
32. Oberthür, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006b. Conceptual Foundations of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in International and EU Environmental Governance: Synergy and Confl ict between Sectoral Legal Systems, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 19 - 51. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
33. Oberth ü r, Sebastian, and Thomas Gehring. 2006c. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance. The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics 6 (2): 1 - 31
34. Palmer, Alice, Beatrice Chaytor, and Jacob Werksman. 2006. Interaction between the World Trade Organization and International Environmental Regimes. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Confl ict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 181 - 204. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
35. Qureshi, Asif H. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the WTO: Co-existence or Incoherence? International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (4): 835 - 855
36. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277 - 309
37. Safrin, Sabrina. 2002a. The Relationship with Other Agreements: Much Ado about a Savings Clause. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development?, ed. Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner, and Helen Marquard, 438 - 454. London: RIIA/ Earthscan
38. Safrin, Sabrina. 2002b. Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements. American Journal of International Law 96 (3): 606 - 628
39. Sand, Peter H. 1997. Whither CITES? The Evolution of a Treaty Regime in the Borderland of Trade and Environment. European Journal of International Law 8 (1): 29 - 58
40. Sandler, Todd. 1997. Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
41. Sands, Philippe. 2003. Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
42. Sawyer, R. Keith. 2001. Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Social Theory. American Journal of Sociology 107 (3): 551 - 585
43. Schoenbaum, Thomas J. 1997. International Trade and Protection of the Environment: The Continuing Search for Reconciliation. American Journal of International Law 91 (1): 268 - 313
44. Schoenbaum, Thomas. 2002. International Trade and Environmental Protection. In International Law and the Environment, 2nd ed., ed. Patricia Birnie and Alan Boyle, 697 - 750. Oxford: Oxford University Press
45. Sebenius, James K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetics: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37 (2): 281 - 316
46. Shaw, Sabina, and Risa Schwartz. 2002. Trade and Environment in the WTO: State of Play. Journal of World Trade 36 (1): 129 - 154
47. Stein, Arthur. 1982. Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World. International Organization 36 (2): 299 - 324
48. Underdal, Arild. 2002. One Question, Two Answers. In Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Confronting Theory with Evidence, ed. Edward L. Miles, Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, J ø rgen Wettestad, Jon Birger Skj æ rseth, and Elaine M. Carlin, 3 - 45. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
49. Underdal, Arild, and Oran R. Young. 2004. Research Strategies for the Future. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, ed. Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young, 361 - 380. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
50. Victor, David G. 2000. The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment after Five Years. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics. 32: 865 - 937
51. von Moltke, Konrad. 1997. Institutional Interactions: The Structure of Regimes for Trade and the Environment. In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, ed. Oran R. Young, 247 - 272. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
52. Werksman, Jacob. 1996. Compliance and Transition: Russia ' s Non-Compliance Tests the Ozone Regime. Zeitschrift f ü r ausl ä ndisches ö ffentliches Recht und V ö lkerrecht 96 (2): 750 - 773
53. Whalley, John, and Ben Zissimos. 2002. Making Environmental Deals: The Economic Case for a World Environment Organization. In Global Environmental Governance: Options and Opportunities, ed. Daniel C. Esty and Maria Ivanova, 163 - 180. New Haven, Conn.: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
54. Wolfrum, R ü diger, and Nele Matz. 2003. Confl icts in International Environmental Law. Berlin: Springer
55. WTO. 1998a. United States Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. Report of the Panel. Geneva: World Trade Organization. http://www.wto.org
56. WTO. 1998b. United States Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. Report of the Appellate Body. Geneva: World Trade Organization. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/58abr.pdf (accessed 18 May 2010)
57. WTO. 2006. European Communities - Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products. Report of the Panel. Geneva: World Trade Organization. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news06_e/291r_e.htm (accessed 18 May 2010)
58. WTO. 2007. Matrix on Trade Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements. WTO Committee on Trade and Environment. Doc. WT/ CTE/W/160/Rev.4 of 14 March 2007. Geneva: World Trade Organization