Anticipating adaptation: A mechanistic approach for linking policy and stock status to recreational angler behavior

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1190-1208

  Abbott, Joshua K ^a   Fenichel, Eli P ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANGLING; CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT; DECISION MAKING; FISHERY MODELING; FISHERY POLICY; FISHERY SURVEY; FISHING MORTALITY; SEASONALITY; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84880959650     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2012-0517     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abbott, J.K., and Wilen, J.E. 2009. Rent dissipation and efficient rationalization in for-hire recreational fishing. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 58(3): 300-314. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2009.03.002.
2. Abbott, J., Maharaj, V., and Wilen, J.E. 2009. Designing ITQ programs for commercial recreational fishing. Mar. Pol. 33(5): 766-774. doi:10.1016/j.marpol. 2009.02.010.
3. Arlinghaus, R., Schwab, A., Riepe, C., and Teel, T. 2012. A primer on anti-angling philosophy and its relevance for recreational fisheries in urbanized societies. Fisheries, 37: 153-164. doi:10.1080/03632415.2012.666472.
4. Bence, J.R., and Smith, K.D. 1999. An overview of recreational fisheries of the Great Lakes. In Great Lakes Fisheries Policy and management: a binational perspective. Edited by W.W. Taylor and C.P. Ferreri. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing. pp. 259-306.
5. Benjamin, D.M., and Bence, J.R. 2003. Spatial and temporal changes in the Lake Michigan chinook salmon fishery, 1985-1996. State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
6. Bhat, C.R. 2005. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Trans. Res. Part B Methodol. 39(8): 679-707. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.08.003.
7. Bhat, C.R. 2008. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (Mdcev) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Trans. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(3): 274-303. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007. 06.002.
8. Bunnefeld, N., Hoshino, E., and Milner-Gulland, E.J. 2011. Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26(9): 441-447. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.003. PMID:21680051.
9. Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M., and Wegge, T.C. 2009. A nested logit model of recreational fishing demand in Alaska. Mar. Res. Econ. 24: 101-129.
10. Claramunt, R.M., Kolb, T.L., Clapp, D.F., Hayes, D.B., Dexter, J.L.J., and Warner, D.M. 2009. Effects of increasing chinook salmon bag limits on alewife abundance: implications for Lake Michigan management goals. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 29: 829-842. doi:10.1577/M08-129.1.
11. Clark, C.W. 1985. Bioeconomic modeling and fisheries management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Clark, C.W. 2005. Mathematical bioeconomics: the optimal management of renewable resources. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
13. Coleman, F.C., Figueira, W.F., Ueland, J.S., and Crowder, L.B. 2004. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science, 305(5692): 1958-1960. doi:10.1126/science.1100397. PMID:15331771.
14. Cooke, S.J., and Cowx, I.G. 2004. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. BioScience, 54(9): 857-859. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0857: TRORFI]2.0.CO;2.
15. Costello, C., Gaines, S.D., and Lynham, J. 2008. Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science, 321: 1678-1681. doi:10.1126/science.1159478. PMID: 18801999.
16. Cox, S.P., Walters, C.J., and Post, J.R. 2003. A model-based evaluation of active management of recreational fishing effort. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 23: 1294-1302. doi:10.1577/M01-228AM.
17. Essington, T.E. 2010. Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(2): 754-759. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907252107. PMID:20080747.
18. Essington, T.E., Melnychuk, M.C., Branch, T.A., Heppell, S.S., Jensen, O.P., Link, J.S., Martell, S.J.D., Parma, A.M., Pope, J.G., and Smith, A.D.M. 2012. Catch shares, fisheries, and ecological stewardship: a comparative analysis of resource responses to a rights-based policy instrument. Conserv. Lett. 5(3): 186-195. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00226.x.
19. Fedler, A.J., and Ditton, R.B. 1994. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19(4): 6-13. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1994)019<0006: UAMIFM>2.0.CO;2.
20. Fenichel, E.P., and Abbott, J.K. 2013. Heterogeneity and the fragility of the first best: putting the "micro" in bioeconomic models of recreational resources. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University.
21. Fenichel, E.P., Tsao, J.I., Jones, M.L., and Hickling, G.J. 2008. Real options for precautionary fisheries management. Fish Fish. 9: 121-137. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00270.x.
22. Fenichel, E.P., Horan, R.D., and Bence, J.R. 2010. Indirect management of invasive species through bio-controls: a bioeconomic model of salmon and alewife in Lake Michigan. Resour. Energy Econ. 32: 500-518. doi:10.1016/ j.reseneeco.2010.04.002.
23. Fenichel, E.P., Abbott, J.K., and Huang, B. 2013. Modelling angler behaviour as a part of the management system: synthesizing a multi-disciplinary literature. Fish Fish. 14: 137-157. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00456.x.
24. Fretwell, S.D., and Lucas, H.L., Jr. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36. doi:10.1007/BFO1601953.
25. Grafton, R.Q., Arnason, R., Bjørndal, T., Campbell, D., Campbell, H.F., Clark, C.W., Connor, R., Dupont, D.P., Hannesson, R., Hilborn, R., Kirkley, J.E., Kompas, T., Lane, D.E., Munro, G.R., Pascoe, S., Squires, D., Steinshamn, S.I., Turris, B.R., and Weninger, Q. 2006. Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63(3): 699-710. doi:10.1139/f05-247.
26. Herriges, J.A., Kling, C.L., and Phaneuf, D.J. 2004. What's the use? Welfare estimates from revealed preference models when weak complementarity does not hold. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 47(1): 55-70. doi:10.1016/S0095-0696 (03)00058-5.
27. Hoy, M., Livernois, J., McKenna, C., Rees, R., and Stengos, T. 2001. Mathematics for economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. Hunt, L.M., Kushneriuk, R., and Lester, N. 2007. Linking agent-based and choice models to study outdoor recreation behaviours: a case of the landscape fisheries model in northern Ontario, Canada. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 81: 163-174.
29. Irwin, B.J., Wilberg, M.J., Jones, M.L., and Bence, J.R. 2011. Applying structured decision making to recreational fisheries management. Fisheries, 36: 113-122. doi:10.1080/03632415.2011.10389083.
30. Johnston, F.D., Arlinghaus, R., and Dieckmann, U. 2010. Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67(9): 1507-1531. doi:10.1139/F10-046.
31. Johnston, R.J., Holland, D.S., Maharaj, V., and Campson, T.W. 2007. Fish harvest tags: an alternative management approach for recreational fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Pol. 31(4): 505-516.
32. Jonas, J. 2011. Statistical catch-at-age models used to describe the status of lean lake trout populations in the 1836-treaty ceded waters of lakes Michigan, Huron, and Superior at the inception of the 2000 Consent Decree: status of lake trout in Lake Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Modeling Subcommittee to the Technical Fisheries Committee.
33. Kellner, J.B., Sanchirico, J.N., Hastings, A., and Mumby, P.J. 2011. Optimizing for multiple species and multiple values: tradeoffs inherent in ecosystem-based fisheries management. Conserv. Lett. 4(1): 21-30. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010. 00132.x.
34. Kuriyama, K., Hanemann, W.M., and Hilger, J.R. 2010. A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model: an application to recreation demand. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 60(3): 209-220. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.005.
35. Lucas, R. 1976. Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1(1): 19-46. doi:10.1016/S0167-2231(76) 80003-6.
36. Lupi, F., Hoehn, J.P., and Christie, G.C. 2003. Using an economic model of recreational fishing to evaluate the benefits of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control on the St. Marys River. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 29(Suppl. 1): 742-754. doi:10. 1016/S0380-1330(03)70528-0.
37. Lyke, A.J. 1993. Discrete choice model to value changes in environmental quality: a Great Lakes study. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
38. Mäler, K.-G. 1974. Environmental economics: a theoretical inquiry. Resources for the Future, Baltimore.
39. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., and Green, J.R. 1995. Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
40. McConnell, K.E., and Sutinen, J.G. 1979. Bioeconomic models of marine recreational fishing. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 6: 127-139. doi:10.1016/0095-0696 (79)90025-1.
41. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
42. Mitchell, M. 2009. Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University Press, New York.
43. Nieland, J.L., Hansen, M.J., Seider, M.J., and Deroba, J.J. 2008. Modeling the sustainability of lake trout fisheries in eastern Wisconsin waters of Lake Superior. Fish. Res. 94(3): 304-314. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2008.07.005.
44. Peterman, R.M., and Anderson, J.L. 1999. Decision analysis: a method for taking uncertainties into account in risk-based decision making. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 5: 231-244. doi:10.1080/10807039991289383.
45. Phaneuf, D.J. 1997. Generalized corner solution models in recreation demand. Ph.D. dissertation, Economics, Iowa State University, Ames.
46. Phaneuf, D.J., and Smith, V.K. 2005. Recreation demand models. In Handbook of environmental economics. Edited by K.G. Maler and J.R. Vincent. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 671-761.
47. Phaneuf, D.J., Kling, C.L., and Herriges, J.A. 2000. Estimation and welfare calculations in a generalized corner solution model with an application to recreation demand. Rev. Econ. Stat. 82(1): 83-92. doi:10.1162/003465300558650.
48. Pinjari, A.R., and Bhat, C. 2009. An efficient forecasting procedure for Kuhn-Tucker consumer demand model systems: application to residential energy consumption. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida.
49. Post, J.R., Sullivan, M., Cox, S.P., Lester, N.P., Walters, C.J., Parkinson, E.A., Paul, A., Jackson, L., and Shuter, B.J. 2002. Canada's recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse? Fisheries, 27(1): 6-17. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2002)027 <0006:CRF>2.0.CO;2.
50. Post, J.R., Persson, L., Parkinson, E.A., and van Kooten, T. 2008. Angler numerical response across landscapes and the collapse of freshwater fisheries. Ecol. Appl. 18(4): 1038-1049. doi:10.1890/07-0465.1. PMID:18536261.
51. Provencher, B., Baerenklau, K.A., and Bishop, R.C. 2002. A finite mixture logit model of recreational angling with serially correlated random utility. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84(4): 1066-1075. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00054.
52. Sainsbury, K.J., Punt, A.E., and Smith, A.D.M. 2000. Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57(3): 731-741. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0737.
53. Shonkwiler, J.S., and Englin, J. 2009. Approximating the distribution of recreational visits from on-site survey data. J. Environ. Manage. 90: 1850-1853. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.004. PMID:19128869.
54. Smith, M.D. 2002. Two econometric approaches for predicting the spatial behavior of renewable resource harvesters. Land Econ. 78(4): 522-538. doi:10.2307/ 3146851.
55. Smith, M.D. 2010. Toward an econometric foundation for marine ecosystembased management. Bull. Mar. Sci. 86(2): 461-477.
56. Train, K. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
57. Tsehaye, I., Jones, M.L., Bence, J.R., Brenden, T.O., and Claramunt, R.M. 2012. Changes in the salmonine community of Lake Michigan and their implications for forage sustainability. [In preparation.]
58. Turner, R.K., and Daily, G.C. 2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 39: 25-35. doi:10.1007/ s10640-007-9176-6.
59. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau. 2006. 2006 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Edited by Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, and US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau.
60. van Putten, I.E., Kulmala, S., Thébaud, O., Dowling, N., Hamon, K.G., Hutton, T., and Pascoe, S. 2012. Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models. Fish Fish. 13(2): 216-235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00430.x.
61. Von Haefen, R.H., and Phaneuf, D.J. 2005. Kuhn-Tucker demand system approaches to nonmarket valuation. In Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. Edited by R. Scarpa and A.A. Alberini. Springer.
62. Wilberg, M.J., Thorson, J.T., Linton, B.C., and Berkson, J. 2010. Incorporating time-varying catchability into population dynamics stock assessment models. Rev. Fish. Sci. 18: 7-18. doi:10.1080/10641260903294647.
63. Wilen, J.E., Smith, M.D., Lockwood, D., and Botsford, L. 2002. Avoiding surprises: incorporating fishermen behavior into management models. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70(2): 553-575.